TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Taking the Knee Before Football Matches

It is now sadly clear that the practice of taking the knee before a football match in the U.K., just like face masks, will be here forever. I had hoped that it would end at the end of last season. But that was of course ridiculously naive of me. Just as I was ridiculously naive to believe that lockdowns would end after two weeks. Or that mass vaccination would end the Covid hysteria. No, face masks and social distancing are here to stay. And who knows? Lockdowns may be here to stay as well.

In much the same way, the practice of taking the knee before the start of every match, adopted in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd, is now here to stay. Football fans, who at first expressed their displeasure at this ritual, have now grown to accept it, much as a resentful public has grown to accept the permanence of massive incursions on personal freedom, all in the name of combating a disease from which 99.5 percent of those who succumb to it survive.

Initially, the practice of taking the knee was an homage to Black Lives Matter movement. However, when confronted by the dubious politics of the BLM organization, the football authorities (which of course all eagerly support this ritual) and the football players insist that all they are doing is protesting racism in football. Apparently, this is the only form of political protest allowed in sport. If a player were to protest Boris Johnson's policy on Brexit and Northern Ireland, say, or the treatment of Julian Assange, or the sanctions policy against Syria, or growing poverty and inequality, or the privatization of the National Health Service, he would very swiftly be marched off the field, hit with a hefty fine and warned that he will be banned from the Premier League forever if he keeps this up.

Protesting racism however is sanctioned, indeed mandated, by the football authorities. Every single player takes part in this ritual of taking the knee. Since it is impossible to believe that there isn't one player in the country who doesn't want to take the knee, that there isn't one player who doesn't believe that this is a meaningless, empty ritual that serves no purpose other than to make people feel good about themselves, one has to accept that an enormous amount of coercion is involved to get everyone in unison to drop to one knee.

This is coercion exercised by the football authorities to protest racism. Fine. Racism is reprehensible. But who are the racists? Who is practicing racism? The Football Association? UEFA? FIFA? The club owners? The club managers? The club coaches? The players? The club ancillary staff? Hard to believe it. If ever there were an activity in which there is a high level of participation from people of color, then it is professional sport, and particularly football. If ever there were an activity in which members of minorities make huge amounts of money, then it is professional sport, and particularly football. If players of color were earning less than their white counterparts, we would have heard about it long ago.

So, clearly, the "racist" sobriquet applies to someone other than the people who administer, and make giant dollops of money off, football. So to whom does it apply? Why, to the fans of course. To the dirty, stupid, ignorant, uneducated masses who show up week after week to pay inordinate sums of money that they don't have to watch their beloved teams play. They are the racists. The very people who ensure that overrated players are grotesquely overpaid, the very people who impoverish themselves in order to be able to follow their teams, they are the racists.

So the players, the managers, the owners all protest against the people who keep them in clover. In this, this overpaid, overprivileged bunch of people are very much like all elites throughout the West. They define themselves by whom they feel superior to, by whom they get to despise daily. And every day--because there is some kind of a football match every day--they seize the opportunity to make their feelings of contempt known.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2156: Scott Ritter: Zelensky's Epic Fail With Trump

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle sat down for a conversation with Scott Ritter. Among the topics covered was President Zelensky's attempt to join in the war on Iran and Trump's blunt rejection of the idea, as well as Gilbert Doctorow's recent claims that Russia is losing the war in Ukraine.

00:49:20
Monday Night At The Movies: "Advise & Consent" (1962)

Join Gagglers for "Advise & Consent"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

02:09:24
TG 2155: Ukraine Escalates, Attacks Iran

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Ukraine's escalation and entry into the war against Iran.

00:34:30

Finland to cut off part of Russia's foreign internet traffic

Finland will stop maintaining power line poles used by telecom operators starting in 2027, Kommersant reports. After electricity exports from Russia ended in 2022, maintaining the infrastructure solely for telecom companies became economically unviable.

Up to 30% of Russia's communication links with Finland run along these power lines, while Finland currently carries an estimated 60–70% of Russia's international internet traffic.
https://x.com/nexta_tv/status/2082430242711322669?s=20

29 minutes ago

Sweden is creating a new civilian foreign intelligence agency, UND, modeled on Britain's MI6 after its military intelligence misjudged Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The new agency will focus on political and strategic intelligence, reflecting a broader European push to strengthen independent intelligence capabilities amid growing security threats and uncertainty over U.S. support.

Source: The Economist

Thanks, Putin

56 minutes ago

Capitals Uncovered on a British government installed, not elected, with FInian Cunningham, ep 143

Martin Sieff and Pelle Taylor geopolitics podcast

1.22K subscribers

Jul 29, 2026

A change of tenant at Downing Street, and the question of whether personnel changes ever amount to policy changes. Andy Burnham arrives with capped bus fares, TikTok fluency and a studied silence on Ukraine — and Finian Cunningham argues that the silence is the point. On his reading, Starmer was not removed for failing; he was removed for hesitating, caught between the establishment's demand for tens of billions in new military spending and the public services that money would have to come out of. Burnham, by his own account not squeamish about that trade, was installed to make it. The conversation turns on where power actually sits in the new cabinet. Cunningham's case is that it sits with John Healey at the Exchequer, not with Ed Miliband at the Foreign Office or Wes ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals