TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Taking the Knee Before Football Matches

It is now sadly clear that the practice of taking the knee before a football match in the U.K., just like face masks, will be here forever. I had hoped that it would end at the end of last season. But that was of course ridiculously naive of me. Just as I was ridiculously naive to believe that lockdowns would end after two weeks. Or that mass vaccination would end the Covid hysteria. No, face masks and social distancing are here to stay. And who knows? Lockdowns may be here to stay as well.

In much the same way, the practice of taking the knee before the start of every match, adopted in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd, is now here to stay. Football fans, who at first expressed their displeasure at this ritual, have now grown to accept it, much as a resentful public has grown to accept the permanence of massive incursions on personal freedom, all in the name of combating a disease from which 99.5 percent of those who succumb to it survive.

Initially, the practice of taking the knee was an homage to Black Lives Matter movement. However, when confronted by the dubious politics of the BLM organization, the football authorities (which of course all eagerly support this ritual) and the football players insist that all they are doing is protesting racism in football. Apparently, this is the only form of political protest allowed in sport. If a player were to protest Boris Johnson's policy on Brexit and Northern Ireland, say, or the treatment of Julian Assange, or the sanctions policy against Syria, or growing poverty and inequality, or the privatization of the National Health Service, he would very swiftly be marched off the field, hit with a hefty fine and warned that he will be banned from the Premier League forever if he keeps this up.

Protesting racism however is sanctioned, indeed mandated, by the football authorities. Every single player takes part in this ritual of taking the knee. Since it is impossible to believe that there isn't one player in the country who doesn't want to take the knee, that there isn't one player who doesn't believe that this is a meaningless, empty ritual that serves no purpose other than to make people feel good about themselves, one has to accept that an enormous amount of coercion is involved to get everyone in unison to drop to one knee.

This is coercion exercised by the football authorities to protest racism. Fine. Racism is reprehensible. But who are the racists? Who is practicing racism? The Football Association? UEFA? FIFA? The club owners? The club managers? The club coaches? The players? The club ancillary staff? Hard to believe it. If ever there were an activity in which there is a high level of participation from people of color, then it is professional sport, and particularly football. If ever there were an activity in which members of minorities make huge amounts of money, then it is professional sport, and particularly football. If players of color were earning less than their white counterparts, we would have heard about it long ago.

So, clearly, the "racist" sobriquet applies to someone other than the people who administer, and make giant dollops of money off, football. So to whom does it apply? Why, to the fans of course. To the dirty, stupid, ignorant, uneducated masses who show up week after week to pay inordinate sums of money that they don't have to watch their beloved teams play. They are the racists. The very people who ensure that overrated players are grotesquely overpaid, the very people who impoverish themselves in order to be able to follow their teams, they are the racists.

So the players, the managers, the owners all protest against the people who keep them in clover. In this, this overpaid, overprivileged bunch of people are very much like all elites throughout the West. They define themselves by whom they feel superior to, by whom they get to despise daily. And every day--because there is some kind of a football match every day--they seize the opportunity to make their feelings of contempt known.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1905: U.S. Readies To Attack Iran; Question Remains: Why?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the apparent preparations the United States is making to launch attacks on Iran, and try to answer the baffling question: Why?

01:53:50
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Tout Va Bien" (1972)

Join Gagglers for the screening of the runner-up in The Gaggle's "France and the spirit of 1968" poll: Jean-Luc Godard's "Tout Va Bien"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

01:35:39
The Gaggle Music Club: Darius Milhaud's "La Création Du Monde"

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Darius Milhaud’s "La création du monde." Composed in 1923, the ballet in one act, is based on African creation myths, and is a pivotal work of early 20th-century music. It synthesizes African myth, jazz idioms and classical form.

Darius Milhaud (1892–1974) was born in Aix-en-Provence, France, into a Provençal Jewish family. He studied at the Paris Conservatoire, where he came under the influence of Charles-Marie Widor, Vincent d’Indy and Paul Dukas, but soon forged his own style, emphasizing polytonality (simultaneous use of multiple keys) and rhythmic energy.

Milhaud was a central figure in the composer collective Les Six, along with Francis Poulenc, Arthur Honegger, Georges Auric, Louis Durey, and Germaine Tailleferre. Les Six were not bound by a formal manifesto. They did not compose in the same style or even collaborate extensively. They objected to what they deemed to be Wagner’s heaviness and Debussy and Ravel’s dreamy impressionism....

00:17:03
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, June 23.

The theme is "Peacetime Army Life."

Please continue to vote after June 9, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on June 30.

Boris Ivanov
·
Following
Studied History & Literature at Russian State University for the HumanitiesJun 8
How accurate is the claim that Vladimir Putin offered to negotiate a peace deal between President Trump and Elon Musk?

That’s not true. Former president Medvedev offered to do that, in exchange for shares of Starlink. That was, of course, trolling. These days, Medvedev is primarily known as an online troll, although he is also Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia. We don’t take most of his musings seriously.

World War Now:
🇺🇸 US President Donald Trump could fire Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard over a ( allegedly ) false report on Iran's nuclear program.

According to CBS, CIA Director John Ratcliffe met with Trump at the White House and presented him with evidence that Iran is supposedly weeks away from having a nuclear bomb.

@CIG_telegram

🇺🇸🇮🇷Today, reports began circulating on social media claiming that the United States is considering the use of tactical nuclear weapons against heavily fortified Iranian targets. These claims were allegedly attributed to coverage by Fox News.

However, Fox has clarified that the nuclear speculation did not originate with them but instead stemmed primarily from the British press.

These reports come amid growing concerns that U.S. conventional bunker-buster bombs may be insufficient to destroy Iran’s heavily protected Fordow nuclear facility—adding to the gravity of the situation.

⚡️🇮🇱🇮🇷 Iranian air defenses ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals