TheGaggle
News • Politics • Culture
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Taking the Knee Before Football Matches

It is now sadly clear that the practice of taking the knee before a football match in the U.K., just like face masks, will be here forever. I had hoped that it would end at the end of last season. But that was of course ridiculously naive of me. Just as I was ridiculously naive to believe that lockdowns would end after two weeks. Or that mass vaccination would end the Covid hysteria. No, face masks and social distancing are here to stay. And who knows? Lockdowns may be here to stay as well.

In much the same way, the practice of taking the knee before the start of every match, adopted in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd, is now here to stay. Football fans, who at first expressed their displeasure at this ritual, have now grown to accept it, much as a resentful public has grown to accept the permanence of massive incursions on personal freedom, all in the name of combating a disease from which 99.5 percent of those who succumb to it survive.

Initially, the practice of taking the knee was an homage to Black Lives Matter movement. However, when confronted by the dubious politics of the BLM organization, the football authorities (which of course all eagerly support this ritual) and the football players insist that all they are doing is protesting racism in football. Apparently, this is the only form of political protest allowed in sport. If a player were to protest Boris Johnson's policy on Brexit and Northern Ireland, say, or the treatment of Julian Assange, or the sanctions policy against Syria, or growing poverty and inequality, or the privatization of the National Health Service, he would very swiftly be marched off the field, hit with a hefty fine and warned that he will be banned from the Premier League forever if he keeps this up.

Protesting racism however is sanctioned, indeed mandated, by the football authorities. Every single player takes part in this ritual of taking the knee. Since it is impossible to believe that there isn't one player in the country who doesn't want to take the knee, that there isn't one player who doesn't believe that this is a meaningless, empty ritual that serves no purpose other than to make people feel good about themselves, one has to accept that an enormous amount of coercion is involved to get everyone in unison to drop to one knee.

This is coercion exercised by the football authorities to protest racism. Fine. Racism is reprehensible. But who are the racists? Who is practicing racism? The Football Association? UEFA? FIFA? The club owners? The club managers? The club coaches? The players? The club ancillary staff? Hard to believe it. If ever there were an activity in which there is a high level of participation from people of color, then it is professional sport, and particularly football. If ever there were an activity in which members of minorities make huge amounts of money, then it is professional sport, and particularly football. If players of color were earning less than their white counterparts, we would have heard about it long ago.

So, clearly, the "racist" sobriquet applies to someone other than the people who administer, and make giant dollops of money off, football. So to whom does it apply? Why, to the fans of course. To the dirty, stupid, ignorant, uneducated masses who show up week after week to pay inordinate sums of money that they don't have to watch their beloved teams play. They are the racists. The very people who ensure that overrated players are grotesquely overpaid, the very people who impoverish themselves in order to be able to follow their teams, they are the racists.

So the players, the managers, the owners all protest against the people who keep them in clover. In this, this overpaid, overprivileged bunch of people are very much like all elites throughout the West. They define themselves by whom they feel superior to, by whom they get to despise daily. And every day--because there is some kind of a football match every day--they seize the opportunity to make their feelings of contempt known.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1817: Team Trump And Zelensky--Is There A Way Back From The Rift?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the growing rift between President Trump and his team and Ukraine President Zelensky, and speculate as to whether the split is irreversible.

01:35:50
February 19, 2025
TG 1816: Trump Excoriates Zelensky, Talks Nice About Russia

George Szamuely discusses the latest diplomatic developments involving the United States, Russia and Ukraine, and tris to make sense of Trump's fury at President Zelensky.

00:49:05
February 19, 2025
TG 1815: Trump & Nixon: The Gaggle Talks To Geoff Shepard

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle talked to former Nixon aide Geoff Shepard and compared the Nixon and Trump presidencies, wondering what either man would think of the other.

00:55:11
The Gaggle Book Club

Each week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

In the spirit of symbiosis, and in light of this week's conversation with former Nixon aide Geoff Shepard, today's book club selection is Jeffrey E. Garten's "Three Days at Camp David: How a Secret Meeting in 1971 Transformed the Global Economy." Published in 2021, Garten's book delves into the pivotal moment when President Richard Nixon decided to sever the U.S. dollar's tie to gold, thereby ending the Bretton Woods system set up in 1944.

In the aftermath of World War II, the Bretton Woods Agreement established a global monetary system: currencies were pegged to the U.S. dollar, and the U.S. dollar was ...

Jeffrey_E._Garten_-_Three_Days_at_Camp_David__How_a_Secret_Meeting_in_1971_Transformed_the_Global_Economy_(2021,_Harper)_-_libgen.li.pdf
February 20, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Feb. 24. The theme is "cinema and business."

Please continue to vote after Feb. 24, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on March 3.

14 hours ago

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/21/federal-judge-ruling-blocks-trump-administration-dei-funding-00205585

Talk about total b*l sht. Insane that a judge appointed by Biden can block Trumps EOs.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals