TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Taking the Knee Before Football Matches

It is now sadly clear that the practice of taking the knee before a football match in the U.K., just like face masks, will be here forever. I had hoped that it would end at the end of last season. But that was of course ridiculously naive of me. Just as I was ridiculously naive to believe that lockdowns would end after two weeks. Or that mass vaccination would end the Covid hysteria. No, face masks and social distancing are here to stay. And who knows? Lockdowns may be here to stay as well.

In much the same way, the practice of taking the knee before the start of every match, adopted in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd, is now here to stay. Football fans, who at first expressed their displeasure at this ritual, have now grown to accept it, much as a resentful public has grown to accept the permanence of massive incursions on personal freedom, all in the name of combating a disease from which 99.5 percent of those who succumb to it survive.

Initially, the practice of taking the knee was an homage to Black Lives Matter movement. However, when confronted by the dubious politics of the BLM organization, the football authorities (which of course all eagerly support this ritual) and the football players insist that all they are doing is protesting racism in football. Apparently, this is the only form of political protest allowed in sport. If a player were to protest Boris Johnson's policy on Brexit and Northern Ireland, say, or the treatment of Julian Assange, or the sanctions policy against Syria, or growing poverty and inequality, or the privatization of the National Health Service, he would very swiftly be marched off the field, hit with a hefty fine and warned that he will be banned from the Premier League forever if he keeps this up.

Protesting racism however is sanctioned, indeed mandated, by the football authorities. Every single player takes part in this ritual of taking the knee. Since it is impossible to believe that there isn't one player in the country who doesn't want to take the knee, that there isn't one player who doesn't believe that this is a meaningless, empty ritual that serves no purpose other than to make people feel good about themselves, one has to accept that an enormous amount of coercion is involved to get everyone in unison to drop to one knee.

This is coercion exercised by the football authorities to protest racism. Fine. Racism is reprehensible. But who are the racists? Who is practicing racism? The Football Association? UEFA? FIFA? The club owners? The club managers? The club coaches? The players? The club ancillary staff? Hard to believe it. If ever there were an activity in which there is a high level of participation from people of color, then it is professional sport, and particularly football. If ever there were an activity in which members of minorities make huge amounts of money, then it is professional sport, and particularly football. If players of color were earning less than their white counterparts, we would have heard about it long ago.

So, clearly, the "racist" sobriquet applies to someone other than the people who administer, and make giant dollops of money off, football. So to whom does it apply? Why, to the fans of course. To the dirty, stupid, ignorant, uneducated masses who show up week after week to pay inordinate sums of money that they don't have to watch their beloved teams play. They are the racists. The very people who ensure that overrated players are grotesquely overpaid, the very people who impoverish themselves in order to be able to follow their teams, they are the racists.

So the players, the managers, the owners all protest against the people who keep them in clover. In this, this overpaid, overprivileged bunch of people are very much like all elites throughout the West. They define themselves by whom they feel superior to, by whom they get to despise daily. And every day--because there is some kind of a football match every day--they seize the opportunity to make their feelings of contempt known.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2016: Trump's 28-Point Plan: The Beginning Of The End?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the 28-point peace plan, ascribed to President Trump, to settle the war in Ukraine and to bring the Russia-NATO standoff to an end, and wonder how seriously we should take it.

01:35:08
November 19, 2025
TG 2015: Gilbert Doctorow: War & Peace & Trump

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle sat down with political analyst and Russia scholar Gilbert Doctorow to discuss the state of the war in Ukraine and the rumors that President Trump has put forward a 28-point peace plan to end the conflict.

00:52:47
November 17, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Tchaikovsky’s Symphony No. 5 In E Minor

This week’s selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Tchaikovsky’s Symphony No. 5 in E minor, Op. 64.

Tchaikovsky began working on the Fifth Symphony in 1888, at the height of his fame as a composer. His ballets (Swan Lake, The Sleeping Beauty), operas (Eugene Onegin) and symphonies had already established his reputation in Russia and abroad.

Traveling extensively, Tchaikovsky studied European orchestral styles and techniques. This is evident in the Fifth Symphony, with its Brahmsian symphonic architecture and cyclical recurrence of themes. The symphony's lush harmonic language and emotional expressivity also show traces of Wagnerian chromaticism and Russian lyricism.

With expressive woodwinds, lyrical string passages and dramatic brass climaxes, Tchaikovsky's orchestration in the Fifth was far richer than it had been in his earlier symphonies.

The symphony is built around one short fate motif that changes character across the movements. Tchaikovsky introduces the fate motif in the first movement. It ...

00:52:53
16 hours ago

Jacob King
@JacobKinge
·
17 h
People don’t realize how much chaos is coming for Bitcoin in the next few months.

Bitcoin mining has entered its most unprofitable stretch in a decade. It currently costs a whopping $112K to mine a single Bitcoin, that’s now only worth $86K and falling fast.

It’s only a matter of time before miners shut down, the network shrinks, and a cascading crash follows.

David Icke
@davidicke
·
5 h
Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about.
Citat
Middle East Observer
@ME_Observer_
·
20 nov.
⚡️ 🚨 A massive explosion hit a crude oil and chemical processing plant in Anzoátegui, Venezuela, one of the country’s key energy hubs

19 hours ago
20 hours ago
January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals