TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Cato Claptrap At Its Finest

Cato, as we have pointed out many times, is controlled opposition. Cato offers the toothless, pointless, incoherent "critique" of U.S. foreign policy that the political-media-military-industrial complex is eager to accept and to tout as evidence of its willingness to "debate" the issues.

Cato of course accepts all of the assumptions underlying U.S. foreign policy: The United States is a force for good, the world is full of bad guys who need to be stopped and U.S. military alliances are all defensive in nature. Cato's only point of departure is on the issue of who is going to pay for it. The U.S. political establishment, as we know, is only too happy to foot the bill. There is no military budget that's too excessive. Along comes little Cato, yapping away that U.S. "allies" need to be doing more and coughing up more for their "defense."

Cato's line of argument is part-and-parcel of the familiar libertarian critique of welfare. The U.S., in other words, is a benevolent hegemon, and the beneficiaries of its largess have become, to use the libertarian parlance, "hooked on welfare." NATO is great; it's just that the U.S. is doing too much.

Cato's voluminous output on Ukraine is completely incoherent. But on one thing it's certain: Russia's attack was supposedly unprovoked and unjustified. It's a great shame that so many people have been taken in by Cato's fraudulent "antiwar" posturing. I guess it's good for raising money from the unsuspecting rubes who think Cato is some kind of a Ron Paul-style outfit.

It would be great if people stopped bankrolling the Cato fraud and began funding much worthier organizations. Here's something intellectually worthless from Cato (yes, I know, that's a redundancy) I just came across:

"Cato and its scholars have condemned, in the strongest possible terms, Russia’s aggression in Ukraine as well as President Putin’s two decades war against freedom and liberalism in Russia. But it’s simply wrong to conflate an argument that the policy of NATO enlargement impacted Putin’s security calculus with the idea that doing so excuses his war in Ukraine. And while Ukraine has a clear interest in deeper U.S. and NATO engagement in its defense, advocating for a sensible U.S. foreign policy that limits risk to American safety and security doesn’t place one on the side of Russia in the conflict."

https://www.cato.org/blog/ukraines-disinformation-board-terrible-idea-terrible-results

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2197: Europe Explodes In Violence

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the sudden explosion of riots and violence in a number of European countries, and explain the disappearance of the political center in much of the continent.

01:09:04
October 16, 2026
TG 2196: Scott Ritter: Trump, Zelensky And A Reorganized World

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle sat down for a conversation with Scott Ritter about President Trump, Ukraine, Russia, Iran and the contours of an emerging new global arrangement.

01:05:51
October 14, 2026
TG 2195: Serbia's Election: National Independence Is On The Ballot

George Szamuely and Serbian political analyst, Vladimir Kršljanin, discuss the Oct. 25 parliamentary election in Serbia, and wonder whether any real political change will follow in Belgrade.

01:07:51
October 14, 2026
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Oct. 19.

In light of recent events at Cornell University, the poll is films that address the theme of wrongful sexual accusations and allegations.

Please continue to vote in this poll after Oct. 19, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Oct. 26.

Trump gives a very detailed account of staring at a fellow senator’s ass

“He came up and he was talking very nicely, and I stood right over here, and I examined his ass. I never did that before. No, I never did that with a man before. I examined his ass, and then I looked at his shoulders, I looked at his feet, I looked at his hand, I looked at his jawline,” the US president said at a Republican campaign rally in Highland Heights, Kentucky.

The event was part of the campaign ahead of the US midterm elections. Ohio Senator Jon Husted is running for reelection.

And of course, Trump has nothing more important to talk about right now. No other problems to deal with.

21 hours ago

Berlin’s Left Party, Greens and SPD have agreed to pursue a Bundesrat initiative seeking to ban the far-right AfD as part of their proposed coalition agreement in Berlin.

The AfD is currently the largest party in recent German federal polls.

The three parties completed exploratory talks on Saturday and plan to begin formal coalition negotiations in early November if their party bodies approve.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals