TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Cato Claptrap At Its Finest

Cato, as we have pointed out many times, is controlled opposition. Cato offers the toothless, pointless, incoherent "critique" of U.S. foreign policy that the political-media-military-industrial complex is eager to accept and to tout as evidence of its willingness to "debate" the issues.

Cato of course accepts all of the assumptions underlying U.S. foreign policy: The United States is a force for good, the world is full of bad guys who need to be stopped and U.S. military alliances are all defensive in nature. Cato's only point of departure is on the issue of who is going to pay for it. The U.S. political establishment, as we know, is only too happy to foot the bill. There is no military budget that's too excessive. Along comes little Cato, yapping away that U.S. "allies" need to be doing more and coughing up more for their "defense."

Cato's line of argument is part-and-parcel of the familiar libertarian critique of welfare. The U.S., in other words, is a benevolent hegemon, and the beneficiaries of its largess have become, to use the libertarian parlance, "hooked on welfare." NATO is great; it's just that the U.S. is doing too much.

Cato's voluminous output on Ukraine is completely incoherent. But on one thing it's certain: Russia's attack was supposedly unprovoked and unjustified. It's a great shame that so many people have been taken in by Cato's fraudulent "antiwar" posturing. I guess it's good for raising money from the unsuspecting rubes who think Cato is some kind of a Ron Paul-style outfit.

It would be great if people stopped bankrolling the Cato fraud and began funding much worthier organizations. Here's something intellectually worthless from Cato (yes, I know, that's a redundancy) I just came across:

"Cato and its scholars have condemned, in the strongest possible terms, Russia’s aggression in Ukraine as well as President Putin’s two decades war against freedom and liberalism in Russia. But it’s simply wrong to conflate an argument that the policy of NATO enlargement impacted Putin’s security calculus with the idea that doing so excuses his war in Ukraine. And while Ukraine has a clear interest in deeper U.S. and NATO engagement in its defense, advocating for a sensible U.S. foreign policy that limits risk to American safety and security doesn’t place one on the side of Russia in the conflict."

https://www.cato.org/blog/ukraines-disinformation-board-terrible-idea-terrible-results

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2177: German Establishment Melts Down As AfD Prepares For Big Breakthrough

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the AfD's major political breakthrough in today's Saxony-Anhalt election.

00:43:42
TG 2176: Mission Pointless: Witkoff, Kushner Fly In To Moscow & Kiev

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the mission to Moscow and Kiev of President Trump's emissaries, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, and wonder whether anything useful could come out of their visits.

01:03:28
September 05, 2026
TG 2175: Will Iran Sink JD Vance's Presidential Ambitions?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss JD Vance's sudden emergence as the Trump administration's public face, and wonder whether the jig is already up for him as far as the 2028 presidential race is concerned.

00:43:31
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Aug. 31.

The theme of this poll is films featuring economic warfare and economic strangulation.

Please continue to vote in this poll after Aug. 31, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Sept. 7.

Why would the Ukros agree to withdraw when the other pieces of shit are incapable of taking it?

Ivan Katchanovski
@I_Katchanovski
·
1 h
Ukrainian media report new Trump peace plan brought by Kushner & Witkoff:
• complete ceasefire
•withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Donbas & part of Zaporizhzhia Oblast with possible deployment of UN contingent there
•Ukraine's non-aligned status and renouncing NATO accession
•referendum and elections
•constitutional amendments
•Kyiv renouncing the forcible return of territories that would come under Russian control
•:imitations on the size of the Ukrainian Armed Forces
•agreements on language issues
•and the signing of a full-fledged peace treaty by the new Ukrainian government, followed by ratification through a special procedure at the UN.

Zelenskyy says war is likely to drag on into winter after US talks
➡️ https://l.euronews.com/MjMd
euronews
@euronews
·
2 h
If the AfD manages to form a government, it would be the first ...

The Iran Watcher
@TheIranWatcher
🚨 The Islamic Republic is running short of gasoline and is now doubling prices for drivers who exceed their quotas.

Starting at midnight on September 7, the over-quota gasoline price will jump 100% from 5,000 to 10,000 tomans per liter.

▪️ First 60 liters: 1,500 tomans/L
▪️ Next 50 liters: 3,000 tomans/L
▪️ Everything above 110 liters: 10,000 tomans/L

The fundamental problem is supply. Iran is consuming roughly 130–135+ million liters of gasoline every day while producing only around 110–121 million, leaving a deficit that must be covered through imports, reserves or shortages.

Sanctions, U.S. naval pressure, war-related damage and years of inadequate refining capacity are making that increasingly difficult. Long queues and tighter quotas have already become part of the pressure.

The Islamic Republic is keeping the first 110 subsidized liters unchanged to limit public anger, while shifting the burden onto those who consume more, ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals