TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Cato Claptrap At Its Finest

Cato, as we have pointed out many times, is controlled opposition. Cato offers the toothless, pointless, incoherent "critique" of U.S. foreign policy that the political-media-military-industrial complex is eager to accept and to tout as evidence of its willingness to "debate" the issues.

Cato of course accepts all of the assumptions underlying U.S. foreign policy: The United States is a force for good, the world is full of bad guys who need to be stopped and U.S. military alliances are all defensive in nature. Cato's only point of departure is on the issue of who is going to pay for it. The U.S. political establishment, as we know, is only too happy to foot the bill. There is no military budget that's too excessive. Along comes little Cato, yapping away that U.S. "allies" need to be doing more and coughing up more for their "defense."

Cato's line of argument is part-and-parcel of the familiar libertarian critique of welfare. The U.S., in other words, is a benevolent hegemon, and the beneficiaries of its largess have become, to use the libertarian parlance, "hooked on welfare." NATO is great; it's just that the U.S. is doing too much.

Cato's voluminous output on Ukraine is completely incoherent. But on one thing it's certain: Russia's attack was supposedly unprovoked and unjustified. It's a great shame that so many people have been taken in by Cato's fraudulent "antiwar" posturing. I guess it's good for raising money from the unsuspecting rubes who think Cato is some kind of a Ron Paul-style outfit.

It would be great if people stopped bankrolling the Cato fraud and began funding much worthier organizations. Here's something intellectually worthless from Cato (yes, I know, that's a redundancy) I just came across:

"Cato and its scholars have condemned, in the strongest possible terms, Russia’s aggression in Ukraine as well as President Putin’s two decades war against freedom and liberalism in Russia. But it’s simply wrong to conflate an argument that the policy of NATO enlargement impacted Putin’s security calculus with the idea that doing so excuses his war in Ukraine. And while Ukraine has a clear interest in deeper U.S. and NATO engagement in its defense, advocating for a sensible U.S. foreign policy that limits risk to American safety and security doesn’t place one on the side of Russia in the conflict."

https://www.cato.org/blog/ukraines-disinformation-board-terrible-idea-terrible-results

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2187: German FM Wadephul Meets Russian FM Lavrov: What's Behind It

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the unexpected meeting in New York City between the Russian and German foreign ministers and wonder what was behind it, and what the likely consequences might be.

00:51:51
TG 2186: New Round Of "Russian Attack Is Imminent" Hysteria Could Trigger Pre-emptive Strike

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the latest seemingly insane media claims that Russia is about to attack Europe's Mediterranean beaches, and wonder whether the NATO Deep State has now firmly decided on provoking a war between NATO and Russia.

00:49:19
September 25, 2026
TG 2185: Are The Latest U.S.-Iran Peace Talks At UN HQ For Real?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the latest diplomatic maneuverings between the Trump administration and Iran at UN headquarters in New York, and wonder whether anything positive could come out of them.

00:59:00
September 09, 2026
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Sept. 14.

To mark the death of a great leader, Ratko Mladić, the theme of the poll is films that feature the lives and deaths of notable (though not necessarily good) political leaders.

Please continue to vote in this poll after Sept. 14, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Sept. 21.

59 minutes ago

BREAKING: The UK is now preparing to ration diesel and petrol and could impose a nationwide 50mph speed limit, with government contingency plans now on the table as pump prices hit a record, per the Express.

It comes as UK diesel broke its 2022 record yesterday at 199.11p a litre (£1.99).

The plans include a maximum purchase scheme limiting how much fuel drivers can buy per visit and restricting selling hours, priority filling stations for emergency services, directed bulk deliveries to utilities and public transport, prioritised diesel for food and health supply chains, and government allocation of crude and imported products.

The UK had 42 days of diesel left as of July, the lowest of any developed nation apart from Australia.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals