TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Cato Claptrap At Its Finest

Cato, as we have pointed out many times, is controlled opposition. Cato offers the toothless, pointless, incoherent "critique" of U.S. foreign policy that the political-media-military-industrial complex is eager to accept and to tout as evidence of its willingness to "debate" the issues.

Cato of course accepts all of the assumptions underlying U.S. foreign policy: The United States is a force for good, the world is full of bad guys who need to be stopped and U.S. military alliances are all defensive in nature. Cato's only point of departure is on the issue of who is going to pay for it. The U.S. political establishment, as we know, is only too happy to foot the bill. There is no military budget that's too excessive. Along comes little Cato, yapping away that U.S. "allies" need to be doing more and coughing up more for their "defense."

Cato's line of argument is part-and-parcel of the familiar libertarian critique of welfare. The U.S., in other words, is a benevolent hegemon, and the beneficiaries of its largess have become, to use the libertarian parlance, "hooked on welfare." NATO is great; it's just that the U.S. is doing too much.

Cato's voluminous output on Ukraine is completely incoherent. But on one thing it's certain: Russia's attack was supposedly unprovoked and unjustified. It's a great shame that so many people have been taken in by Cato's fraudulent "antiwar" posturing. I guess it's good for raising money from the unsuspecting rubes who think Cato is some kind of a Ron Paul-style outfit.

It would be great if people stopped bankrolling the Cato fraud and began funding much worthier organizations. Here's something intellectually worthless from Cato (yes, I know, that's a redundancy) I just came across:

"Cato and its scholars have condemned, in the strongest possible terms, Russia’s aggression in Ukraine as well as President Putin’s two decades war against freedom and liberalism in Russia. But it’s simply wrong to conflate an argument that the policy of NATO enlargement impacted Putin’s security calculus with the idea that doing so excuses his war in Ukraine. And while Ukraine has a clear interest in deeper U.S. and NATO engagement in its defense, advocating for a sensible U.S. foreign policy that limits risk to American safety and security doesn’t place one on the side of Russia in the conflict."

https://www.cato.org/blog/ukraines-disinformation-board-terrible-idea-terrible-results

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Salvador" (1986)

Join Gagglers for "Salvador"!
The screening starts at 4 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 4 p.m. ET

02:02:35
TG 2088: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 16: Asymmetric War Gets Evermore Asymmetric

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Day 16 of the U.S.-Israel War On Iran, and conclude that, while the United States has gone through plans A, B and C, Iran has so far stuck to its strategy of inflicting as much pain as possible on its adversaries.

01:20:22
TG 2087: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 14: Is There Any Way To Get Out Of This Mess?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle examine how the war that the United States and Israel launched against Iran 13 days ago is going, and wonder whether there is any way it can end without escalating into a world war.

01:31:47
The Putin-Clinton Conversations

Vladimir Putin and Bill Clinton discussed removing Slobodan Milošević from power 20 years ago. This is a sad read. Putin did as little to help Milošević (the man who withstood 11 weeks of NATO bombing) as he did 14 years later Viktor Yanukovych.

https://amp.meduza.io/en/feature/2020/10/08/the-regime-changers

9 hours ago
post photo preview
17 hours ago

Joe Kent still has integrity
Joe Kent
@joekent16jan19
After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today.

I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.

It has been an honor serving under @POTUS
and @DNIGabbard
and leading the professionals at NCTC.

May God bless America.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals