TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
TG 958: German Government Foils "Coup," Launches Mass Arrests
Only for Subscribers
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
post image
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
December 01, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Alban Berg's “Lyric Suite”

This week’s selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Alban Berg's “Lyric Suite.” Composed during 1925–26, the work is a twelve-tone string quartet that secretly encodes a forbidden love affair.

Berg wrote the suite during the time he was emotionally involved with Hanna Fuchs-Robettin, the wife of a Prague businessman and sister of writer Franz Werfel. Berg was married to Helene Nahowski, a noble and socially prominent Viennese woman. The romance therefore had to be kept clandestine.

The work was for many years interpreted as a purely abstract serial composition. However, in 1976, musicologist George Perle discovered a marked-up score of the suite in Hanna’s library. The score contained personal markings in Berg’s hand, secret dedications, references to private meetings and quotations from operas with erotic or tragic meaning.

Berg’s “Lyric Suite” is thus a rigorously constructed twelve-tone composition and a coded love confession—Berg’s most intimate emotional ...

00:33:36
TG 2023: The Witkoff-Kushner Mission To Moscow: Is The End Any Closer?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the Witkoff-Kushner mission to Moscow, and wonder whether President Trump's emissaries' 5-hour meeting with President Putin has brought the war any closer to a conclusion.

00:50:21
November 30, 2025
TG 2024: Distinguished Historian Doesn't Distinguish Himself

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss an interview given to the "Telegraph" by Antony Beevor, in which the eminent military historian shows himself to be unable to rise above trite cliches when it comes to describing the war in Ukraine.

00:42:22

"WE Refused Diplomacy" - Col. Daniel Davis vs. Gen. Ben Hodges On Russia/Ukraine War...

Mario Nawfal

150K subscribers

802 views Premiered 76 minutes ago

Join this channel to get access to perks:    / @marionawfal   Is Russia winning this war or is Putin bleeding out behind the propaganda? U.S. General Ben Hodges and Colonel Daniel Davis go head-to-head on the battlefield, the politics, and the future of the entire region. Nothing was off limits. They clashed on:

Whether Russia’s goal is territory or the total destruction of Ukraine’s military

Why Pokrovsk is close to falling and what that really means for the front

If Russia has air supremacy, the manpower advantage, and the industrial base to grind Ukraine down

Why Ukrainian brigades are collapsing from manpower shortages while Russia stockpiles weapons for a much bigger fight

Whether NATO is already in a “low-level war” with Moscow

How sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil are hitting Russia’s ...

People will insist that Putin's 'approach' is working in Ukraine. But, it will hardly be said to be working if we end up in a nuclear war. Yes, it will be directly the fault of the Europeans, but if your body has become gently floating radioactive ash, you will not be in a position to smugly point fingers.

Dr. Gilbert Doctorow : Are US/Russian Negotiations a Waste of Time?

10 hours ago

Yaaaaaay, AI judges
ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸
@BarronTNews_
Cont de comentarii
🚨JUST IN: Elon Musk is basically trying to flip the whole court system upside down. He’s talking about an AI judge that can look at a case and spit out a decision in seconds. No lawyers dragging things out for months. No endless filings. None of the nonsense that turns simple disputes into life-ruining bills.

And honestly, you can already see why the people who profit from the current mess are freaking out. A fast, clean system with no games? That scares the hell out of them. They’ve built careers on delays and confusion.

Musk is basically saying: “Why does justice take years when the facts are right there?”
And he’s not wrong. The only people who hate this idea are the ones who know their power depends on keeping everything slow and impossible.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals