TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Russia Continues To Make Nice To No Purpose

Vassily Nebenzia, Russia's permanent representative to the U.N., disclosed yesterday that Russia had agreed to extend the Black Sea grain agreement for another two months even though the Western powers had refused to implement the agreement.

While Russia has cooperated with Ukraine and Turkey to get Ukraine's grain out through the Black Sea and the Straits, the Western powers have done nothing to implement the second part of the agreement, namely, the bit about lifting sanctions in order to allow Russia to ship out its grain and fertilizers. Remember the hysteria of a few months back? We were told that the world was on the brink of widespread famine unless the ports of Ukraine--the supposed "bread-basket of the world"--were immediately unblocked and the "20 million tons" of grain warehoused there were shipped out to feed the world's hungry.

Well, Russia, Ukraine and Turkey, under U.N. auspices, worked out an agreement whereby Ukraine got its grain out. But, apparently, the world just wasn't hungry enough to entice the Western powers to lift their sanctions and allow Russia--the true "bread-basket of the world"--to ship its grain out. Though that was a key part of the agreement negotiated by U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, the Western countries cheerfully forgot about it.

The Western media blare that the E.U. and the U.S. did not impose sanctions on food and that therefore Russia is lying when it complains about sanctions. That isn't true. There are sanctions on shipping and insurance. With those sanctions in place, Russia is unable to export its grain. As for the grain from Ukraine, it did not go to feed the world's hungry, but went instead to Europe's farmers in order to feed their animals so as to make those very tasty (and expensive) hams. Not that Europe's farmers were happy about the sudden dumping of Ukrainian grain in European markets. The E.U. is already waging war on Europe's farmers who are supposedly guilty of contributing to global warming.

Anyway, Russia now feels betrayed and is threatening not to renew the agreement in two months' time. This is really getting very tedious: Why would Russia have ever thought that the Western powers were sincere about implementing the Black Sea grain agreement? Because they were so punctilious about implementing Minsk? Of course, they were insincere about sending the grain to Africa. And of course they were insincere about lifting sanctions on Russia. Of course it was a scam. How many more times are Russians going to be taken in by Western perfidy?

Does Russia really think anything will change in two months' time? It seems as if, despite all the talk of Russia's making a final break with the West, nothing much has changed. Russia still treats the Western powers as "partners" or "colleagues." Any bets that, come May, Russia will, after much grumbling and complaining, renew the agreement for another two months? And, needless to say, we will hear warnings: "This is positively the last time we will renew!"

Why would the West take those threats any more seriously than any other of Russia's threats and supposed "red lines"?

https://russiaun.ru/en/news/170323_n

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1905: U.S. Readies To Attack Iran; Question Remains: Why?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the apparent preparations the United States is making to launch attacks on Iran, and try to answer the baffling question: Why?

01:53:50
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Tout Va Bien" (1972)

Join Gagglers for the screening of the runner-up in The Gaggle's "France and the spirit of 1968" poll: Jean-Luc Godard's "Tout Va Bien"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

01:35:39
The Gaggle Music Club: Darius Milhaud's "La Création Du Monde"

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Darius Milhaud’s "La création du monde." Composed in 1923, the ballet in one act, is based on African creation myths, and is a pivotal work of early 20th-century music. It synthesizes African myth, jazz idioms and classical form.

Darius Milhaud (1892–1974) was born in Aix-en-Provence, France, into a Provençal Jewish family. He studied at the Paris Conservatoire, where he came under the influence of Charles-Marie Widor, Vincent d’Indy and Paul Dukas, but soon forged his own style, emphasizing polytonality (simultaneous use of multiple keys) and rhythmic energy.

Milhaud was a central figure in the composer collective Les Six, along with Francis Poulenc, Arthur Honegger, Georges Auric, Louis Durey, and Germaine Tailleferre. Les Six were not bound by a formal manifesto. They did not compose in the same style or even collaborate extensively. They objected to what they deemed to be Wagner’s heaviness and Debussy and Ravel’s dreamy impressionism....

00:17:03
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, June 23.

The theme is "Peacetime Army Life."

Please continue to vote after June 9, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on June 30.

Boris Ivanov
·
Following
Studied History & Literature at Russian State University for the HumanitiesJun 8
How accurate is the claim that Vladimir Putin offered to negotiate a peace deal between President Trump and Elon Musk?

That’s not true. Former president Medvedev offered to do that, in exchange for shares of Starlink. That was, of course, trolling. These days, Medvedev is primarily known as an online troll, although he is also Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia. We don’t take most of his musings seriously.

World War Now:
🇺🇸 US President Donald Trump could fire Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard over a ( allegedly ) false report on Iran's nuclear program.

According to CBS, CIA Director John Ratcliffe met with Trump at the White House and presented him with evidence that Iran is supposedly weeks away from having a nuclear bomb.

@CIG_telegram

🇺🇸🇮🇷Today, reports began circulating on social media claiming that the United States is considering the use of tactical nuclear weapons against heavily fortified Iranian targets. These claims were allegedly attributed to coverage by Fox News.

However, Fox has clarified that the nuclear speculation did not originate with them but instead stemmed primarily from the British press.

These reports come amid growing concerns that U.S. conventional bunker-buster bombs may be insufficient to destroy Iran’s heavily protected Fordow nuclear facility—adding to the gravity of the situation.

⚡️🇮🇱🇮🇷 Iranian air defenses ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals