TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Russia Continues To Make Nice To No Purpose

Vassily Nebenzia, Russia's permanent representative to the U.N., disclosed yesterday that Russia had agreed to extend the Black Sea grain agreement for another two months even though the Western powers had refused to implement the agreement.

While Russia has cooperated with Ukraine and Turkey to get Ukraine's grain out through the Black Sea and the Straits, the Western powers have done nothing to implement the second part of the agreement, namely, the bit about lifting sanctions in order to allow Russia to ship out its grain and fertilizers. Remember the hysteria of a few months back? We were told that the world was on the brink of widespread famine unless the ports of Ukraine--the supposed "bread-basket of the world"--were immediately unblocked and the "20 million tons" of grain warehoused there were shipped out to feed the world's hungry.

Well, Russia, Ukraine and Turkey, under U.N. auspices, worked out an agreement whereby Ukraine got its grain out. But, apparently, the world just wasn't hungry enough to entice the Western powers to lift their sanctions and allow Russia--the true "bread-basket of the world"--to ship its grain out. Though that was a key part of the agreement negotiated by U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, the Western countries cheerfully forgot about it.

The Western media blare that the E.U. and the U.S. did not impose sanctions on food and that therefore Russia is lying when it complains about sanctions. That isn't true. There are sanctions on shipping and insurance. With those sanctions in place, Russia is unable to export its grain. As for the grain from Ukraine, it did not go to feed the world's hungry, but went instead to Europe's farmers in order to feed their animals so as to make those very tasty (and expensive) hams. Not that Europe's farmers were happy about the sudden dumping of Ukrainian grain in European markets. The E.U. is already waging war on Europe's farmers who are supposedly guilty of contributing to global warming.

Anyway, Russia now feels betrayed and is threatening not to renew the agreement in two months' time. This is really getting very tedious: Why would Russia have ever thought that the Western powers were sincere about implementing the Black Sea grain agreement? Because they were so punctilious about implementing Minsk? Of course, they were insincere about sending the grain to Africa. And of course they were insincere about lifting sanctions on Russia. Of course it was a scam. How many more times are Russians going to be taken in by Western perfidy?

Does Russia really think anything will change in two months' time? It seems as if, despite all the talk of Russia's making a final break with the West, nothing much has changed. Russia still treats the Western powers as "partners" or "colleagues." Any bets that, come May, Russia will, after much grumbling and complaining, renew the agreement for another two months? And, needless to say, we will hear warnings: "This is positively the last time we will renew!"

Why would the West take those threats any more seriously than any other of Russia's threats and supposed "red lines"?

https://russiaun.ru/en/news/170323_n

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Monday Night At The Movies: "Ivan The Terrible, Part II: The Boyars' Plot" (1946)

Join Gagglers for "Ivan the Terrible, Part II: The Boyars' Plot"!

The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.

Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

01:21:51
January 18, 2026
TG 2054: Europeans Defying Trump Over Greenland Are Slapped With Tariffs

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's imposition of tariffs on European states that are openly defying his wish to acquire the territory of Greenland for the United States.

00:56:30
January 18, 2026
TG 2053: Zakharova Challenges Yad Vashem About Genocide In The USSR

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Russia's inauguration of a Day of Remembrance for the Victims of the Genocide of the Soviet People, perpetrated by the Nazis, and the furious response this has drawn from Israel's Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center.

01:02:45
23 hours ago

This looks like clown-world :)))) this is beyond infantile

CONFIRMED: Norway’s Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre has acknowledged Trump’s letter is real.

The letter reportedly ties Norway’s Nobel Peace Prize decision to Greenland, questions Denmark’s “right of ownership,” and declares the world isn’t secure unless the U.S. has “Complete and Total Control of Greenland.”

PBS’s Nick Schifrin reported the text was obtained from multiple officials and circulated by NSC staff to European ambassadors.

It reads like a meme.

It’s not. https://x.com/allenanalysis/status/2013236630350389710?s=20

23 hours ago

BREAKING: We just reviewed Trump’s recent National Security Strategy and Greenland isn’t even mentioned once. Remember this when Trump officials talk about how conquering Greenland is a top national security priority. They are lying to you. https://x.com/MAGALieTracker/status/2012945930333343927?s=20
But
Look at Project 2025 https://x.com/Butterbeanqween/status/2012964867171402207?s=20

23 hours ago
January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals