TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Russia Continues To Make Nice To No Purpose

Vassily Nebenzia, Russia's permanent representative to the U.N., disclosed yesterday that Russia had agreed to extend the Black Sea grain agreement for another two months even though the Western powers had refused to implement the agreement.

While Russia has cooperated with Ukraine and Turkey to get Ukraine's grain out through the Black Sea and the Straits, the Western powers have done nothing to implement the second part of the agreement, namely, the bit about lifting sanctions in order to allow Russia to ship out its grain and fertilizers. Remember the hysteria of a few months back? We were told that the world was on the brink of widespread famine unless the ports of Ukraine--the supposed "bread-basket of the world"--were immediately unblocked and the "20 million tons" of grain warehoused there were shipped out to feed the world's hungry.

Well, Russia, Ukraine and Turkey, under U.N. auspices, worked out an agreement whereby Ukraine got its grain out. But, apparently, the world just wasn't hungry enough to entice the Western powers to lift their sanctions and allow Russia--the true "bread-basket of the world"--to ship its grain out. Though that was a key part of the agreement negotiated by U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, the Western countries cheerfully forgot about it.

The Western media blare that the E.U. and the U.S. did not impose sanctions on food and that therefore Russia is lying when it complains about sanctions. That isn't true. There are sanctions on shipping and insurance. With those sanctions in place, Russia is unable to export its grain. As for the grain from Ukraine, it did not go to feed the world's hungry, but went instead to Europe's farmers in order to feed their animals so as to make those very tasty (and expensive) hams. Not that Europe's farmers were happy about the sudden dumping of Ukrainian grain in European markets. The E.U. is already waging war on Europe's farmers who are supposedly guilty of contributing to global warming.

Anyway, Russia now feels betrayed and is threatening not to renew the agreement in two months' time. This is really getting very tedious: Why would Russia have ever thought that the Western powers were sincere about implementing the Black Sea grain agreement? Because they were so punctilious about implementing Minsk? Of course, they were insincere about sending the grain to Africa. And of course they were insincere about lifting sanctions on Russia. Of course it was a scam. How many more times are Russians going to be taken in by Western perfidy?

Does Russia really think anything will change in two months' time? It seems as if, despite all the talk of Russia's making a final break with the West, nothing much has changed. Russia still treats the Western powers as "partners" or "colleagues." Any bets that, come May, Russia will, after much grumbling and complaining, renew the agreement for another two months? And, needless to say, we will hear warnings: "This is positively the last time we will renew!"

Why would the West take those threats any more seriously than any other of Russia's threats and supposed "red lines"?

https://russiaun.ru/en/news/170323_n

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Salvador" (1986)

Join Gagglers for "Salvador"!
The screening starts at 4 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 4 p.m. ET

02:02:35
TG 2088: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 16: Asymmetric War Gets Evermore Asymmetric

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Day 16 of the U.S.-Israel War On Iran, and conclude that, while the United States has gone through plans A, B and C, Iran has so far stuck to its strategy of inflicting as much pain as possible on its adversaries.

01:20:22
TG 2087: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 14: Is There Any Way To Get Out Of This Mess?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle examine how the war that the United States and Israel launched against Iran 13 days ago is going, and wonder whether there is any way it can end without escalating into a world war.

01:31:47
The Putin-Clinton Conversations

Vladimir Putin and Bill Clinton discussed removing Slobodan Milošević from power 20 years ago. This is a sad read. Putin did as little to help Milošević (the man who withstood 11 weeks of NATO bombing) as he did 14 years later Viktor Yanukovych.

https://amp.meduza.io/en/feature/2020/10/08/the-regime-changers

10 hours ago
post photo preview
18 hours ago

Joe Kent still has integrity
Joe Kent
@joekent16jan19
After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today.

I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.

It has been an honor serving under @POTUS
and @DNIGabbard
and leading the professionals at NCTC.

May God bless America.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals