TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Russia Continues To Baffle

Tass is running two articles today, based on excerpts of an interview Putin gave to Rossiya-24 TV channel. The interview isn't posted on the Kremlin Web site, and perhaps never will be.

In one article, Putin points out that NATO is building a global military condominium that resembles what the Axis powers sought to do in the 1930s and 40s:

"What is the United States doing? They are creating more and more alliances. And this gives grounds for Western analysts, Western political analysts to say just that the West is building new ‘axes’. <...> It is Western analysts, not us, who say that the West begins to build a new axis similar to the one that was created in the 1930s by fascist regimes in Germany, Italy and militaristic Japan."

That sounds quite alarming. If true, Russia needs to get its act together and prepare. NATO and its global proxies are extremely wealthy, highly industrialized states. If they do decide on war, they will have far greater resources at their disposal than Japan, Germany and their various largely useless allies had at that time.

So, is Russia getting ready? Is China? It doesn't sound like it, to be honest. In the second excerpt, Putin assures his interviewer that the Russia-China alliance poses no threat to anyone. Hell, it's not even a "military alliance." Note that NATO is a military alliance. Note that the partnerships NATO is setting up around the world are nothing if not military.

Russia and China however are just doing their own thing. Here is Putin:

"We are not creating any military alliance with China. Yes, we also cooperate on the track of military-technical cooperation, we do not hide it, but it is transparent, there is nothing secret there....By the way, not only with China, but with other countries as well. We even continue it now, despite the developments in Donbass, Zaporozhye and Kherson. We still continue; it's all transparent, but it's not a military alliance."

So, Russia, Putin will have us believe is involved in an existential struggle, a fight for its very survival as a state. It is up against an alliance far more formidable than the one it barely survived in the 1940s, and it's going into this fight with no allies. (Let's not forget, in World War II, the USSR had two formidable allies in its corner. Let's also not forget that Japan betrayed its Axis ally, Nazi Germany, and refused to wage war against the USSR.) How on earth does Russia plan to prevail against a formidable, menacing global force, with no help coming from others save for some soothing banalities emanating from Beijing?

The anodyne reference to "developments in Donbass, Zaporozhye and Kherson" doesn't suggest that Russia sees itself as engaged in an existential struggle. Isn't the argument that Russia isn't fighting Ukraine but NATO? Isn't Russia supposed to be seeking the removal of the Nazis from Kiev? Isn't Russia supposed to be seeking a Ukraine that will not be a permanent, hostile forward-base for NATO? If that's not what Russia is seeking, then why launch the Special Military Operation to begin with?

What these two Tass pieces demonstrate that, even after the passage of more than a year, Russia has still to figure out what its military and political and objectives are.

https://tass.com/politics/1594537

https://tass.com/politics/1594529

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
December 08, 2025
TG 2025: Does Trump's National Security Strategy Signal A Revolution In U.S. Foreign Policy

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle continue discussing the Trump administration's new National Security Strategy, and wonder whether the very radical-sounding document portends a revolution in U.S. foreign policy.

01:47:52
December 08, 2025
TG 2025: Does Trump's National Security Strategy Signal A Revolution In U.S. Foreign Policy

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle continue discussing the Trump administration's new National Security Strategy, and wonder whether the very radical-sounding document portends a revolution in U.S. foreign policy.

01:47:52
December 05, 2025
TG 2024: Trump's New National Security Strategy Scorns Europe

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's newly-released National Security Strategy 2025, and agree that its most startling and unprecedented aspect is its scornful dismissal of Europe as a serious geopolitical player.

01:33:21
The Gaggle Book Club: “Show Trials: Stalinist Purges in Eastern Europe, 1948–1954” by George H. Hodos

Each week, The Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is "Show Trials: Stalinist Purges in Eastern Europe, 1948–1954" by George H. Hodos. Published in 1987, the book offers a comparative political history of the Stalinist purges in seven Eastern European “people’s democracies” from 1948, the year of the Stalin-Tito split, to 1954, the year after Stalin’s death.

Hodos's overall thesis is that the show trials were instruments of political discipline imposed by Moscow on its newly created satellite-states, designed to eliminate local autonomy, destroy potentially independent elites and enforce ideological conformity through terror.

Hodos was...

Show_Trials___Stalinist_Purges_in_Eastern_Europe,_1948-1954_--_George_H_Hodos;_Joseph_Stalin_--_Bloomsbury_USA,_New_York,_1987_--_Praeger_Publishers_--_9780275927837_--_219d61266ab448d9341f1ca05084d3ac_--_Anna’s_Archive.pdf
Live Chat
December 08, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies: "Mephisto" (1981)

Join Gagglers for "Mephisto"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

There are still issues with Locals. So, I uploaded the film on Rumble. So, you can click on the link, and watch the movie. The chat works same as before. See you at 3 p.m. ET

placeholder
December 07, 2025
TG 2025: Does Trump's National Security Strategy Signal A Revolution In U.S. Foreign Policy

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle continue discussing the Trump administration's new National Security Strategy, and wonder whether the very radical-sounding document portends a revolution in U.S. foreign policy.

Locals is acting up again. So we are re-posting from YouTube. Sincere apologies.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals