TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Russia Continues To Baffle

Tass is running two articles today, based on excerpts of an interview Putin gave to Rossiya-24 TV channel. The interview isn't posted on the Kremlin Web site, and perhaps never will be.

In one article, Putin points out that NATO is building a global military condominium that resembles what the Axis powers sought to do in the 1930s and 40s:

"What is the United States doing? They are creating more and more alliances. And this gives grounds for Western analysts, Western political analysts to say just that the West is building new ‘axes’. <...> It is Western analysts, not us, who say that the West begins to build a new axis similar to the one that was created in the 1930s by fascist regimes in Germany, Italy and militaristic Japan."

That sounds quite alarming. If true, Russia needs to get its act together and prepare. NATO and its global proxies are extremely wealthy, highly industrialized states. If they do decide on war, they will have far greater resources at their disposal than Japan, Germany and their various largely useless allies had at that time.

So, is Russia getting ready? Is China? It doesn't sound like it, to be honest. In the second excerpt, Putin assures his interviewer that the Russia-China alliance poses no threat to anyone. Hell, it's not even a "military alliance." Note that NATO is a military alliance. Note that the partnerships NATO is setting up around the world are nothing if not military.

Russia and China however are just doing their own thing. Here is Putin:

"We are not creating any military alliance with China. Yes, we also cooperate on the track of military-technical cooperation, we do not hide it, but it is transparent, there is nothing secret there....By the way, not only with China, but with other countries as well. We even continue it now, despite the developments in Donbass, Zaporozhye and Kherson. We still continue; it's all transparent, but it's not a military alliance."

So, Russia, Putin will have us believe is involved in an existential struggle, a fight for its very survival as a state. It is up against an alliance far more formidable than the one it barely survived in the 1940s, and it's going into this fight with no allies. (Let's not forget, in World War II, the USSR had two formidable allies in its corner. Let's also not forget that Japan betrayed its Axis ally, Nazi Germany, and refused to wage war against the USSR.) How on earth does Russia plan to prevail against a formidable, menacing global force, with no help coming from others save for some soothing banalities emanating from Beijing?

The anodyne reference to "developments in Donbass, Zaporozhye and Kherson" doesn't suggest that Russia sees itself as engaged in an existential struggle. Isn't the argument that Russia isn't fighting Ukraine but NATO? Isn't Russia supposed to be seeking the removal of the Nazis from Kiev? Isn't Russia supposed to be seeking a Ukraine that will not be a permanent, hostile forward-base for NATO? If that's not what Russia is seeking, then why launch the Special Military Operation to begin with?

What these two Tass pieces demonstrate that, even after the passage of more than a year, Russia has still to figure out what its military and political and objectives are.

https://tass.com/politics/1594537

https://tass.com/politics/1594529

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2124: Was Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Supposed To Be Iran's Delcy Rodriguez?

George Szamuely discusses the latest claims that Iran's former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was supposedly designated to be Iran's Delcy Rodriguez.

00:17:33
TG 2123: Thomas Massie Defeated--Israel Lobby Gets Another Scalp

George Szamuely discusses the successful targeting of Congressman Thomas Massie.

00:20:05
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "White Mischief" (1987)

Join Gagglers for "White Mischief"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

01:46:46

Reported in Russian media: China Asks Russia to Reduce Gas Price by 5 Times to Approve the "Power of Siberia – 2" Project

Vladimir Putin embarked on his 25th visit to China to once again persuade Xi Jinping to agree to the construction of the "Power of Siberia – 2" gas pipeline . Since the main stumbling block remains the issue of supply costs, "Gazprom" made a very advantageous offer on the gas price, a source close to the monopoly told Bloomberg. However, the Chinese side did not demonstrate readiness to advance the project.

According to him, Beijing still wants to buy gas at a price comparable to the level on the domestic Russian market. It is heavily subsidized and amounts to about $50 per thousand cubic meters. This is about 12 times lower than current European quotations and 5 times lower than the price China is currently paying — $258. https://x.com/Beefeater_Fella/status/2057016829034262676?s=20 :))))) unlimited partnership

16 hours ago

Do not whistle in the synagogue, lest you end up like Massie ;)

Miriam Adelson Wrote a $1.3 Million Check the Day After Massie Raised $1.3 Million From Thousands of Small Donors
One Israeli national offset thousands of American voices with a single check. Trump asked Adelson on camera how she buys influence. She said: 'Can you allow me not to answer?'

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals