TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
December 08, 2024
The Gaggle Music Club

Today is a very sad day. Damascus has fallen, and some very bad people are crowing and relishing further such successes. The Gaggle Music Club has therefore chosen a suitably sad piece of music. It is Maurice Ravel’s Pavane pour une infante défunte (Pavane for a Dead Princess).

Composed in 1899 and dedicated to Ravel’s patron, Princess Edmond de Polignac, Pavane is known for its hauntingly beautiful melody and understated elegance. The work was initially written for solo piano, but Ravel orchestrated it in 1910.

Despite its evocative title, Ravel claimed that the piece wasn’t meant to mourn any specific princess, and that the title was chosen primarily for its charm and alliteration. He described it as a nostalgic evocation of a slow Spanish court dance (pavane) as it might have been performed by an imaginary princess from the Renaissance.

The Pavane is simple and lyrical, with a gently flowing main theme that develops gradually. Marked "Très lent" (very slow), the piece has a reflective and serene quality. The stately rhythm echoes the measured pace of a traditional pavane.

The harmonic language makes frequent use of modal inflections and delicate dissonances, characteristic of Ravel’s impressionistic style.

The Pavane became immensely popular after its premiere, though Ravel later expressed mild dissatisfaction with the work, considering it a youthful effort.
Today, it is celebrated as a masterpiece of understated elegance and one of Ravel’s most popular compositions. It never fails to evoke feelings of melancholia and suppressed longing.

The pianist here is Alice Sara Ott.

00:07:25
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
December 29, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies: "The Sorrow And The Pity" Part II (1969)

Join Gagglers for "The Sorrow and the Pity" Part II!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

02:13:06
December 28, 2025
TG 2037: Zelensky Comes To Mar-A-Lago Trying To Entice Trump Into War

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Ukraine President Zelensky's visit to President Trump at Mar-A-Lago, where he will tout his 20-point peace plan in order to ensnare the American president in a protracted war against Russia.

00:56:24
December 28, 2025
TG 2038: The Bush-Putin Conversations II

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle return to the subject of the conversations that took place from 2001 to 2008 between presidents George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin, during which the subject of the threat to Russia posed by an enlarged NATO repeatedly came up.

00:32:21
January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals