TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
December 14, 2024
The Gaggle Book Club

Every week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be one of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

This week's selection for the Gaggle Book Club is a book that was actually recommended by a Gaggler, @Mojo1982 : "Brest-Litovsk: The Forgotten Peace, March 1918," by John W. Wheeler-Bennett. First published in 1939, the book recounts the negotiations between the Bolsheviks (who had seized power in Russia three months earlier) and the generals of the imperial German army.

Purporting to represent the Russian Empire, V. I. Lenin's Bolsheviks, had sued for peace and, as the war's losing party, they expected their German adversaries to impose savage peace terms on them. Once the war against Imperial Germany was concluded, Lenin argued, the Bolsheviks would be able to focus on defeating their political enemies and consolidating their power inside Russia. Lenin's critics among the Bolsheviks were loath to accept peace terms that effectively entailed the dismantlement of the Russian Empire. Lenin however was only concerned with holding on to power. There were no limits to the territorial concessions he was ready to make to secure that end.

Lenin's calculation was that the Western powers--now much strengthened with America's entry into the war on their side--would eventually defeat Imperial Germany. When that happened, the victorious Entente powers would not allow Germany to keep any of its winnings in the east, and would cancel whatever humiliating peace treaty it had forced Russia, a member of the Entente, to sign.

The Bolsheviks did indeed surrender vast areas of the Russian Empire at Brest-Litovsk: A Ukrainian state was carved out of Russia and came under German influence. A state of Poland was also carved out of Russia. Large portions of Belarus came under German control, as did Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Russia was forced to recognize the independence of Finland. In the Caucasus, territories such as Kars, Ardahan, and Batum were surrendered to the Ottoman Empire, an ally of Imperial Germany's.

The lands comprised 34% of the former empire's population, 54% of its industrial land, 89% of its coalfields, and 26% of its railways. The losses amounted to over 1 million square miles, stripping Russia of critical resources and populations.

However, Germany lost the war in the west, just as Lenin had predicted it would. With the signing of the armistice on Nov. 11, 1918, came annulment of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. Nonetheless, many of the concessions and surrenders of territory remained in place, until Stalin in 1939 began to rearrange the map of Eastern Europe and the USSR. The states created as a result of Brest-Litovsk have proved to be of dubious value to peace, security, indeed to European civilization as a whole. We are very much living with the consequences of that massive carve-up of the Russian Empire.

As it turned out, Brest-Litovsk proved to be a Pyrrhic victory for Germany. The Germans wasted precious manpower standing guard over their new territorial acquisitions--manpower they badly needed, first for their Easter 1918 offensive on the Western Front, and then to hold the line against the Western powers' eventually successful Fall 1918 offensive.

wheeler_bennett_brestlitovskthef018745mbp.pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2165: Ian Proud: Where Did All The Diplomats Go?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle sat down for a conversation with long-serving former UK diplomat Ian Proud to discuss: Whatever happened to the craft of diplomacy, a skill Europeans, including the British, once possessed in abundance?

To order Ian Proud's novel: https://www.waterstones.com/book/searching/ian-t-proud/9781739543136

00:50:25
TG 2164: Putin Warns West: "You Seize Our Ships, We Seize Yours"

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Russian President Putin's stark warning to the West: Russia will retaliate against any seizure of Russian vessels by Western countries by seizure of Western vessels.

00:54:24
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Body Heat" (1981)

Join Gagglers for "Body Heat"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

01:53:12
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Aug. 10.

To mark the dog-days of August, the theme of this poll is heatwaves and extreme heat in films.

Please continue to vote in this poll after Aug. 10, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Aug. 17.

8 minutes ago

The Trump and Witkoff families are opening a bank in Florida. The investors in this bank are undisclosed. It will not have to follow FDIC rules.

I smell a money-laundering opportunity.
https://x.com/PiperK/status/2088517170770931770?s=20

Amid the narrative that the "US is losing" or "run by Israel" —there are no serious attempts to understand Washington's grand strategy.

On the Substack charts for 4 months straight: how the US took on Iran, Venezuela, Russia and seized the planet's fuel.
https://x.com/richimedhurst/status/2088404648793121182?s=20

This Caused CONTROVERSY - Russia's Opposition Has NO Strategy to END the War!

Silicon Curtain

192K subscribers

Aug 14, 2026

DESCRIPTION: Nigel Gould-Davies on the Russian Exiled Opposition: Sanctions, Strategy, and the War in Ukraine

Nigel Gould-Davies returns to discuss controversial articles he wrote about the Russian exiled opposition, arguing many share the radical goal of ending or “liquidating” the Putin regime yet lobby Western governments for restrained policies that undermine that objective. He critiques calls to narrow sanctions, push a postwar “Marshall Plan” for Russia, liberalize large-scale Russian immigration to Europe, and oppose transferring roughly $300B in frozen Russian central bank assets to Ukraine, contending these steps would aid Russia’s war capacity and pose counterintelligence risks. Gould-Davies stresses sanctions are essential to constraining the Russian war machine and that easing them would increase ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals