TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
December 14, 2024
The Gaggle Book Club

Every week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be one of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

This week's selection for the Gaggle Book Club is a book that was actually recommended by a Gaggler, @Mojo1982 : "Brest-Litovsk: The Forgotten Peace, March 1918," by John W. Wheeler-Bennett. First published in 1939, the book recounts the negotiations between the Bolsheviks (who had seized power in Russia three months earlier) and the generals of the imperial German army.

Purporting to represent the Russian Empire, V. I. Lenin's Bolsheviks, had sued for peace and, as the war's losing party, they expected their German adversaries to impose savage peace terms on them. Once the war against Imperial Germany was concluded, Lenin argued, the Bolsheviks would be able to focus on defeating their political enemies and consolidating their power inside Russia. Lenin's critics among the Bolsheviks were loath to accept peace terms that effectively entailed the dismantlement of the Russian Empire. Lenin however was only concerned with holding on to power. There were no limits to the territorial concessions he was ready to make to secure that end.

Lenin's calculation was that the Western powers--now much strengthened with America's entry into the war on their side--would eventually defeat Imperial Germany. When that happened, the victorious Entente powers would not allow Germany to keep any of its winnings in the east, and would cancel whatever humiliating peace treaty it had forced Russia, a member of the Entente, to sign.

The Bolsheviks did indeed surrender vast areas of the Russian Empire at Brest-Litovsk: A Ukrainian state was carved out of Russia and came under German influence. A state of Poland was also carved out of Russia. Large portions of Belarus came under German control, as did Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Russia was forced to recognize the independence of Finland. In the Caucasus, territories such as Kars, Ardahan, and Batum were surrendered to the Ottoman Empire, an ally of Imperial Germany's.

The lands comprised 34% of the former empire's population, 54% of its industrial land, 89% of its coalfields, and 26% of its railways. The losses amounted to over 1 million square miles, stripping Russia of critical resources and populations.

However, Germany lost the war in the west, just as Lenin had predicted it would. With the signing of the armistice on Nov. 11, 1918, came annulment of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. Nonetheless, many of the concessions and surrenders of territory remained in place, until Stalin in 1939 began to rearrange the map of Eastern Europe and the USSR. The states created as a result of Brest-Litovsk have proved to be of dubious value to peace, security, indeed to European civilization as a whole. We are very much living with the consequences of that massive carve-up of the Russian Empire.

As it turned out, Brest-Litovsk proved to be a Pyrrhic victory for Germany. The Germans wasted precious manpower standing guard over their new territorial acquisitions--manpower they badly needed, first for their Easter 1918 offensive on the Western Front, and then to hold the line against the Western powers' eventually successful Fall 1918 offensive.

wheeler_bennett_brestlitovskthef018745mbp.pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2042: Can Maduro Prevail In Court?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the kinds of legal defenses Nicolas Maduro will likely present in court, and wonder whether, whatever their strengths, he has any chance of prevailing.

01:43:42
January 03, 2026
TG 2041: Trump Takes Out Maduro: Now What?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the dramatic seizure by the U.S. of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, and wonder what happens now.

01:03:51
January 02, 2026
TG 2040: What's Really Going On In Iran?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle sat down for a long conversation with University of Tehran Professor Mohammad Marandi about latest events in Iran, as well as the likelihood of a new war with Israel.

01:04:56
Monday Night At The Movies: "Nicholas And Alexandra" (1971)

Dear Gagglers:

Monday is, and has always been, a profoundly depressing day. That's why we have decided to add a little bit of fun to it.

On Monday, Jan. 5, we are holding another film screening. Gagglers can watch a movie and, as they do so, offer comments, random thoughts, aesthetic observations and critical insights in the Live Chat.

We will be screening the winner of The Gaggle's "Kings, Queens, Royalty and the Courts" poll: Franklin J. Schaffner's Oscar-winning "Nicholas and Alexandra," starring Janet Suzman.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067483/?ref_=fn_t_1

December 31, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Jan. 5.

The theme is "Kings, Queens, Royalty and the Courts."

Please continue to vote after Jan. 5, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Jan. 12.

The geopolitical advantage of Venezuela:

As we outline below, Venezuela holds BILLIONS of barrels of heavy crude oil.

Who else holds large amounts of heavy crude oil? Russia.

Who is the largest IMPORTER of Venezuelan crude oil? China.

In fact, ~5% of China's annual crude oil imports are sourced from Venezuela.

And, who has some of the largest HEAVY crude oil refineries in the world? The US.

It is no coincidence that President Trump said "China is going to get oil" during his press conference yesterday.

The US controlling Venezuela provides strategic geopolitical leverage over both China and Russia.

This is not a coincidence. https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2007856298570707430?s=20

PRESIDENT TRUMP NOW:

"We need Greenland for national security." https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2007888803957186563?s=20

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals