TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
December 22, 2024
The Gaggle Music Club

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Edward Elgar's Symphony No. 1, in A-flat Major, Op. 55. The work premiered on Dec. 3, 1908, in Manchester, with Hans Richter conducting the Hallé Orchestra. Though Elgar composed it relatively late in his career, it was his first venture into the symphonic genre.

The symphony was written during a period of relative peace and prosperity in Britain, and reflects some of the grandeur, confidence and optimism of the Edwardian era that was about to come to an end. (See this week's selection of George Dangerfield's "The Strange Death of Liberal England" for The Gaggle Book Club.)

Elgar’s Symphony No. 1 can be characterized as a cyclic symphony, meaning that its thematic material recurs across movements, creating a sense of unity.

Movement I: Andante. Nobilmente e semplice: The movement begins with a grand and noble theme in A-flat major, which recurs throughout the symphony. This theme, often referred to as the "nobilmente" theme, sets a tone of dignity and emotional depth.

Movement II: Allegro molto: It is a dramatic and restless scherzo in C minor, and contrasts sharply with the opening movement's nobility. The movement is filled with syncopated rhythms and energetic drive, reflecting Elgar's mastery of orchestral color.

Movement III: Adagio: This is a slow and wistful movement in F-sharp major; it is often considered the emotional core of the symphony. Lyrical and introspective, the movement showcases Elgar's ability to craft deeply personal music.

Movement IV: Lento – Allegro: The finale begins ominously before breaking into an exuberant development of the "nobilmente" theme. The triumphant conclusion reaffirms the symphony's overarching sense of grandeur and optimism.

Elgar’s Symphony No. 1 balances late Romantic influences (such as Brahms and Wagner) with distinctly British sensibilities. The work moves seamlessly between grandeur, melancholy, and triumph, capturing a range of emotions.

Though Elgar's Symphony No. 1 comes across as as a quintessentially British musical work--capturing the dignity and restraint that were once the hallmarks of the British national character--the work also speaks to universal themes of struggle, introspection and triumph.

The symphony highlights Elgar’s command of orchestration and thematic development, and helped make plausible the claim that, for one brief moment, British music could hold its own against the works generated by Europe's contemporary titans of music.

00:50:33
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2088: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 16: Asymmetric War Gets Evermore Asymmetric

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Day 16 of the U.S.-Israel War On Iran, and conclude that, while the United States has gone through plans A, B and C, Iran has so far stuck to its strategy of inflicting as much pain as possible on its adversaries.

01:20:22
TG 2087: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 14: Is There Any Way To Get Out Of This Mess?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle examine how the war that the United States and Israel launched against Iran 13 days ago is going, and wonder whether there is any way it can end without escalating into a world war.

01:31:47
International Committee To Defend Slobodan Milošević

This is the news conference from Belgrade, March 10, 2026. Unfortunately, almost all of it, with the exception of George Szamuely's contribution, is in Serbian.

01:56:42
The Putin-Clinton Conversations

Vladimir Putin and Bill Clinton discussed removing Slobodan Milošević from power 20 years ago. This is a sad read. Putin did as little to help Milošević (the man who withstood 11 weeks of NATO bombing) as he did 14 years later Viktor Yanukovych.

https://amp.meduza.io/en/feature/2020/10/08/the-regime-changers

Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, March 9.

The theme is "Coups and Military Dictatorships."

Please continue to vote after March 9, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on March 16.

This is absolutely insane:

Prior to the Iran war, US oil companies were generating ~$62 billion in annual free cash flow with oil prices at $55/barrel.

Now, with oil prices at $100/barrel, US oil companies are expected to generate $163 billion in annual free cash flow, if current prices are sustained.

In other words, US oil giants are set to rake in an additional +$100 BILLION in free cash flow per year if oil prices remain elevated.

We are arguably witnessing the most profitable market conditions in history for US big oil. https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2032977830234214487?s=20

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals