TheGaggle
News • Politics • Culture
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
January 04, 2025
The Gaggle Book Club

Each week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is Alexander Solzhenitsyn's "200 Years Together." Published in two volumes--in 2001 and 2002--the book explores the history of Jews in Russia from the late 18th century to the late 20th century, with a particular focus on the Soviet era.

Solzhenitsyn traces the historical relationship between Jews and Russians over two centuries, beginning with Catherine the Great's establishment of the Pale of Settlement in 1791, which confined Jewish populations to certain regions in the Russian Empire. He goes on to document the integration of Jews into Russian society during the 19th century, exploring their contributions to commerce, education and culture, while also addressing tensions over assimilation and discrimination.

Solzhenitsyn provides a historical account of Jewish communities in Russia following their inclusion in the empire after the partitions of Poland during the late 18th century. He examines their initial confinement to the Pale of Settlement and their gradual but uneven assimilation during the 19th century.

Solzhenitsyn argues that Tsarist policies were both protective and restrictive.
On the one hand, Jews faced exclusion and quotas; on the other hand, Jews were also encouraged to participate in the cultural and economic life of Russia. This led to social and economic mobility, and to rise in Jewish prosperity. He demolishes the myth of the supposedly unmitigated oppression that Jews lived under during the reign of the Tsars.

The heart of the book however is a detailed account of the role the Jews played in the the Bolshevik Revolution and during the subsequent Soviet era. Critics of the book have claimed that Solzhenitsyn blamed the Jews for the revolution and for the imposition of the Soviet system on the Russian people. This is untrue. While acknowledging that many Jews did play a prominent role in the Bolshevik movement and in the terror that followed Lenin's seizure of power, Solzhenitsyn does not hesitate to detail the repression that Jews lived under during Soviet times. Jewish religious and cultural practices were suppressed as brutally as Russian Orthodox religious and cultural practices were.

Nonetheless, Jews will forever be associated with Bolshevism. This is understandable. Jews were prominent among the Bolsheviks, and they had a wildly disproportionate presence--relative to the size of their population--among Soviet officialdom.

However, as Solzhenitsyn points out, there is something very self-serving about the Russian habit of blaming Bolshevism on the Jews. It serves to get Russians off the hook. Most of the Bolsheviks, particularly Lenin and Stalin, were not Jews. Moreover, Jewish Bolsheviks never thought of themselves as Jews; in fact, they disdained their Jewish origins and upbringing, and did little to advance Jewish culture and identity. To be sure, the Jewish Bolsheviks, like all of the Bolsheviks, harbored a deep animus toward the Russian people and Russian culture.

When it comes to the last years of the Stalin era, Solzhenitsyn describes the purges of Jewish intellectuals and the dismantling of Jewish institutions. However, unlike most Western commentators, Solzhenitsyn refuses to see this repression as uniquely targeted against the Jews. It was of a piece with Stalinist repression as a whole. The brutal treatment accorded to the Jews was not very different from the brutal treatment accorded to everyone else.

Solzhenitsyn concludes with a call for reconciliation between Russians and Jews, as well as mutual acknowledgment of shared suffering. It's unlikely to happen, but Solzhenitsyn was a devout Christian, and reconciliation and acknowledgment of sins are key parts of the Christian faith.

Naturally, Solzhenitsyn's call for mutual reconciliation didn't sit well with critics. How could Solzhenitsyn draw any parallels between the pain endured by Jews and that endured by Russians? How could there be any symmetry between victimizers and victimized? The value of Solzhenitsyn's book is that it demolishes the simple-minded, anti-Russian tropes that Western commentators, neo-conservatives, professional Russophobes, and Jewish emigres in the West have been peddling for years.

The book is not an easy read. Nothing Solzhenitsyn wrote ever is, but it's an important book that all Gagglers should at least attempt to get through.

Aleksandr_Solzhenitsyn_-_200_Years_Together_(2002).pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Monday Night At The Movies: "The Caine Mutiny" (1954)

"The Caine Mutiny" starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

02:04:05
The Gaggle Music Club

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Béla Bartók’s Concerto for Orchestra. Composed in 1943, during Bartók’s years of exile in the United States, the piece was commissioned by conductor of the Boston Symphony Orchestra, Serge Koussevitzky, to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the orchestra.

Bartók had emigrated to the United States in 1940. He struggled with poor health, including an undiagnosed case of leukemia. He also had to endure considerable financial difficulties as his music had limited appeal in the United States. Thanks to the generous fee Bartók received, he was able to return to composing.

Bartók called it a "concerto" rather than a symphony because the work spotlighted various instruments or groups of instruments within the orchestra, treating them almost as if the players playing them were soloists.

The Concerto for Orchestra consists of five movements, each contributing a unique character and showcasing Bartók’s mastery of orchestral color. The ...

00:38:19
TG 1774: The Political Agenda Behind Ukraine's Refusal To Renew Gas Transit Agreement

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the consequences for Moldova and, in particular, for Transnistria, as a result of Ukraine's refusal to renew the transit agreement with Gazprom, and conclude that the West is using the likely crisis as an opportunity to open up a second front against Russia in Transnistria.

00:47:34
11 hours ago

This is truly historic:

China’s 30-year government bond yield has dropped below Japan’s 30-year yield for the first time ever.

Over the last 4 years, China’s bond yield has declined by a whopping 215 basis points.

This comes as China’s economy has slowed and experienced 6 straight quarters of deflation, the longest streak since 1999.

At the same time, Japan’s bond yield has risen 160 basis points as inflation has picked up in the country.

In the past, Japan had seen 3 decades of economic stagnation and had suffered 25 years of deflation starting in the 1990s.

China is entering a new economic phase.

https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1875954984753541471

China's economic miracle of the past decades was fueled by cheap labor, massive infrastructure spending, and relentless urbanization. But now, labor is more expensive, infrastructure is overbuilt, and urbanization is hitting a ceiling. https://x.com/Kamil_Maitah/status/1875956093521928602

China faces dueling threats from a deepening property crisis ...

11 hours ago

Everything the elites have done has brought poverty.

Right now they're trying to convince you AI will create a utopia. This couldn't be further from the truth. https://x.com/FinanceLancelot/status/1876132955955065242

HUMANITY is the last hope and if they don't get their arse in gear and start refusing to collectively conform to the dictates of evil no one is going 'save Great Britain' or anywhere else. Certainty not Tate or Trump-Musk. This is not a 'bombshell' by the way. It's a Catherine wheel.

Tradu postarea
Citat
Shadow of Ezra
@ShadowofEzra
·
10 h
Andrew Tate has dropped a bombshell, announcing his plans to run for Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in the next general election, vowing to "save Great Britain."

Tate, who once called Donald Trump "the hero and last hope for Western civilization."
https://x.com/davidicke/status/1876165752354488368

BREAKING: The Canadian Dollar is surging on reports of Justin Trudeau resigning. https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1876101589762814375 [to make room for that other Zio, Polievre ...

12 hours ago
January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals