TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
January 04, 2025
The Gaggle Book Club

Each week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is Alexander Solzhenitsyn's "200 Years Together." Published in two volumes--in 2001 and 2002--the book explores the history of Jews in Russia from the late 18th century to the late 20th century, with a particular focus on the Soviet era.

Solzhenitsyn traces the historical relationship between Jews and Russians over two centuries, beginning with Catherine the Great's establishment of the Pale of Settlement in 1791, which confined Jewish populations to certain regions in the Russian Empire. He goes on to document the integration of Jews into Russian society during the 19th century, exploring their contributions to commerce, education and culture, while also addressing tensions over assimilation and discrimination.

Solzhenitsyn provides a historical account of Jewish communities in Russia following their inclusion in the empire after the partitions of Poland during the late 18th century. He examines their initial confinement to the Pale of Settlement and their gradual but uneven assimilation during the 19th century.

Solzhenitsyn argues that Tsarist policies were both protective and restrictive.
On the one hand, Jews faced exclusion and quotas; on the other hand, Jews were also encouraged to participate in the cultural and economic life of Russia. This led to social and economic mobility, and to rise in Jewish prosperity. He demolishes the myth of the supposedly unmitigated oppression that Jews lived under during the reign of the Tsars.

The heart of the book however is a detailed account of the role the Jews played in the the Bolshevik Revolution and during the subsequent Soviet era. Critics of the book have claimed that Solzhenitsyn blamed the Jews for the revolution and for the imposition of the Soviet system on the Russian people. This is untrue. While acknowledging that many Jews did play a prominent role in the Bolshevik movement and in the terror that followed Lenin's seizure of power, Solzhenitsyn does not hesitate to detail the repression that Jews lived under during Soviet times. Jewish religious and cultural practices were suppressed as brutally as Russian Orthodox religious and cultural practices were.

Nonetheless, Jews will forever be associated with Bolshevism. This is understandable. Jews were prominent among the Bolsheviks, and they had a wildly disproportionate presence--relative to the size of their population--among Soviet officialdom.

However, as Solzhenitsyn points out, there is something very self-serving about the Russian habit of blaming Bolshevism on the Jews. It serves to get Russians off the hook. Most of the Bolsheviks, particularly Lenin and Stalin, were not Jews. Moreover, Jewish Bolsheviks never thought of themselves as Jews; in fact, they disdained their Jewish origins and upbringing, and did little to advance Jewish culture and identity. To be sure, the Jewish Bolsheviks, like all of the Bolsheviks, harbored a deep animus toward the Russian people and Russian culture.

When it comes to the last years of the Stalin era, Solzhenitsyn describes the purges of Jewish intellectuals and the dismantling of Jewish institutions. However, unlike most Western commentators, Solzhenitsyn refuses to see this repression as uniquely targeted against the Jews. It was of a piece with Stalinist repression as a whole. The brutal treatment accorded to the Jews was not very different from the brutal treatment accorded to everyone else.

Solzhenitsyn concludes with a call for reconciliation between Russians and Jews, as well as mutual acknowledgment of shared suffering. It's unlikely to happen, but Solzhenitsyn was a devout Christian, and reconciliation and acknowledgment of sins are key parts of the Christian faith.

Naturally, Solzhenitsyn's call for mutual reconciliation didn't sit well with critics. How could Solzhenitsyn draw any parallels between the pain endured by Jews and that endured by Russians? How could there be any symmetry between victimizers and victimized? The value of Solzhenitsyn's book is that it demolishes the simple-minded, anti-Russian tropes that Western commentators, neo-conservatives, professional Russophobes, and Jewish emigres in the West have been peddling for years.

The book is not an easy read. Nothing Solzhenitsyn wrote ever is, but it's an important book that all Gagglers should at least attempt to get through.

Aleksandr_Solzhenitsyn_-_200_Years_Together_(2002).pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2084: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 5: No Coherent Explanation, No Plan B And No Exit Strategy

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the U.S.-Israel war on Iran, and wonder as to the shifting, mutually contradictory explanations as to the reasons for this war, its objectives and any possible exit strategy.

01:18:14
Monday Night At The Movies: "The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover" (1989)

Join Gagglers for "The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

02:03:56
TG 2083: Is Trump Already Searching For An Off-Ramp?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the second day of the war on Iran unleashed by Israel and the United States, and wonder whether President Trump can easily get himself out of the mess that he has created for himself.

01:21:44

Roland Bartetzko
·
Following
Logistics in Ukraine (2022–present)Wed
Based on its performance so far, how many months will it take for the Russian army to completely occupy Donbass?

Based on their performance over the past six weeks, it will probably take the Russians forever.

At the moment, all Russian attacks in eastern and southern Ukraine are failing to yield any territorial gains. The reports from the frontline sectors all sound the same: “X number of Russian attacks have been repelled. No advances by Russian troops.”

On the other hand, Ukraine has successfully liberated several areas, mostly in the Zaporizhzhia direction (near Yuliapole, etc.).

The Russian “juggernaut” is currently out of steam.

Spring is in the air in Ukraine. (Picture by the author of this post)

Of course, it’s far too early to celebrate, but important Ukrainian defense goals have been achieved. In this regard, the complete Russian occupation of the town of Pokrovsk, once an important logistics hub,...

Man, this idiot fossil is way behind the times :)))
NEXTA
@nexta_tv
·
28 m
🤡Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov said the “spirit of Anchorage” is starting to evaporate

“The spirit is the atmosphere, and it was friendly and based on mutual respect. But the spirit is evaporating,” he lamented, suggesting that the agreements between Russia and the United States are turning into a pumpkin.

Botin Kurdistani
@kurdistannews24
·
6 h
As a Kurdish journalist, I don’t trust Donald Trump.
In my opinion, he made a deal with Erdoğan and wants to destroy Iraqi Kurdistan the same way Syrian Kurdistan was targeted.

Trump betrayed the 2017 Kurdistan independence referendum.
Trump betrayed the Syrian Kurds in 2019.
Trump betrayed the Syrian Kurds again in 2026.

George Papadopoulos
@GeorgePapa19
·
9 h
🚨BREAKING: Drones attacking Georgian territory and specifically the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline network which is 30% of Israel’s oil source

My sources in the region confirmed that the ballistic missile ...

Some comments from Substack:

S Blackford
25m

Its curious. Most people say North Vietnam won the war against the US. Yet millions of vietnamese and cambodians died and now the vietnamese are a manufacturing labour force for western retailers. It hardly feels like a victory.

https://substack.com/@josealnino/note/c-223059560?r=o786d :))))))

Patriot
Patriot
1h
Edited

In other news, NATO continues sinking Russian tankers all over the world [1][2], while Putin is lying that it was the Ukis in order not to be asked to react to what is essentially an act of war. Allegedly, Ukis sank Russian tanker in Mediterranean and not NATO!

Excerpt from [1]: Russia's Transport Ministry stated in a post on Telegram that the attack on the LNG tanker was "carried out from the Libyan coast by Ukrainian unmanned boats."

[1] Russia Says Ukrainian Drone Boat Blew Up Shadow LNG Tanker In Mediterranean | ZeroHedge | Wed, Mar 04, 2026

...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals