TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
January 26, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Charles Ives's "Three Places In New England"

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Charles Ives's "Three Places in New England."

Ives composed the piece between 1911 and 1914, and revised the work multiple times until its final orchestration in 1929. The composition reflects Ives’s fascination with memory, place and the emotional resonance of the American landscape, blending his experimental approach to harmony, rhythm and musical structure with deeply personal and historical inspirations.

Each movement of Three Places in New England is tied to a specific location and narrative:

1. The "St. Gaudens" in Boston Common (Col. Shaw and his Colored Regiment)

Inspired by Augustus Saint-Gaudens’ Boston Common memorial to Robert Gould Shaw and the 54th Massachusetts Regiment, the first African-American regiment to fight for the Union during the Civil War. Ives portrays the solemn heroism of these soldiers, emphasizing themes of dignity and tragedy.

2. Putnam’s Camp, Redding, Connecticut

A nostalgic reflection on childhood and patriotism, this movement recalls a Revolutionary War camp in Connecticut. It is filled with humor and chaos as it depicts a child's vision of patriotic parades, military exercises and imagined historical events.

3. The Housatonic at Stockbridge

Based on Ives’s honeymoon experience walking along the Housatonic River in Stockbridge, Massachusetts. The serene setting is interwoven with reflections on nature, spirituality and the passage of time, creating a highly impressionistic soundscape.

"Three Places in New England" demonstrates Ives's innovative use of polytonality, polyrhythm and collage techniques. Each movement showcases different stylistic features that highlight Ives’s synthesis of American folk traditions, hymn tunes and experimentalism.

The composition was an important stage in Ives’s exploration of "American-ness" in music. The piece exemplifies many of Ives's characteristic traits. For example, Ives incorporates hymn tunes, patriotic songs, and folk material into the orchestral texture, blending high art and vernacular traditions in a way that was unprecedented at the time.

In addition, the work exemplifies Ives's groundbreaking techniques in polytonality complex layering, and rhythmic innovation. They placed the composition at the forefront of modernism. Despite this complexity, the piece retains a deeply personal and emotional core, grounded in Ives's love of America and his memories of New England.

Critical responses to "Three Places in New England" evolved significantly over time, reflecting broader changes in the reception of Charles Ives's music. Initially, Ives's music struggled to gain widespread recognition due to its unconventional techniques, dense textures and radical approach to form and tonality. Early performances of "Three Places in New England" were rare, but when the work was introduced to audiences in the 1930s and 1940s, reactions were mixed.

Some critics and musicians dismissed Ives's music as unpolished or overly chaotic. They viewed his use of quotation and layering as amateurish or a failure to adhere to traditional compositional norms. Others, however, began to recognize the originality and emotional depth of the work, praising its adventurous spirit and the uniquely American character it conveyed.

As Ives's stature as a pioneering American composer grew in the mid-20th century, "Three Places in New England" came to be seen as a major contribution to modernist music. By the 1960s and 1970s, conductors such as Leonard Bernstein and Leopold Stokowski regularly performed Ives's orchestral works, thereby ensuring that pieces such as "Three Places" gained critical and academic attention.

"Three Places in New England" stands as one of Ives's seminal works, bridging his experimental chamber music, such as"The Concord Sonata," and his later orchestral masterpieces, such as "The Unanswered Question" and Symphony No. 4. The work encapsulates his belief in music as a vehicle for memory, transcendence and reflection on the American experience, making it a cornerstone of early 20th-century American music.

The work here was performed in May 18, 2017, by Ensemble intercontemporain, under the direction of Matthias Pintscher

00:21:54
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
October 31, 2025
TG 2000: Trump: Toppling Maduro And Betraying Your MAGA Base

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's clearly-stated intent to overthrow violently President Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela, while betraying his MAGA supporters and going back on all of his pre-election promises.

01:07:54
October 31, 2025
TG 1999: Trump Plans To Resume Nuclear Testing; E.U. Plans To Go To War

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the strange incongruity between the nonchalance with which the NATO powers prepare to go to war against Russia and the emotional vituperations that greeted President Trump's announcement that the U.S. intends to resume nuclear testing.

00:57:14
October 29, 2025
TG 1998: E.U. Threatens Member States: Agree To Steal Russia's Assets Or Else!

George Szamuely discusses the European Commission's resort to dark threats in the face recalcitrant E.U. member-states's refusal to agree to the theft of Russia's sovereign assets.

00:36:18
October 30, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Nov. 3.

The theme is "films that have audiences rooting for the villain."

Please continue to vote after Nov. 3, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Nov. 10.

October 31, 2025
Russia Votes To Renew Mandate Of E.U. Force In Bosnia

After all the big talk about the sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina and about the need to end the reign of the illegal and illegitimate Office of the High Representative and about the unjust persecution of the republic's Serbs and about the brutally undemocratic act of kicking the elected president of Republika Srpska, Milorad Dodik, out of office by an unelected bureaucrat, after all of that, Russia dutifully lined up at the U.N. Security Council with all of the powers supposedly waging war against it, to renew the mandate of the E.U.-led stabilization force for one more year.

One need hardly add that, since this is a force led by the E.U., not only does Russia play no role whatsoever in it but the force itself is deeply antagonistic to Russia's great friend and ally: the Serbs.

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/un-security-council-renews-eu-led-stabilization-force-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina/3732080

October 31, 2025

So it begins?
🇷🇴⚖️💉 #BREAKING | The High Court of Cassation & Justice (ICCJ), in a groundbreaking ruling, has ruled that the Romanian state is liable to pay damages to people who suffered from side effects as a result of being injected with the COVID-19 vaccine!

The summary of the decision can be read by clicking the link below:

🔗 https://www.scj.ro/1093/Detalii-jurisprudenta?customQuery%5B0%5D.Key=id&customQuery%5B0%5D.Value=230235#highlight=##

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals