TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
February 01, 2025
The Gaggle Book Club: James Bacque's "Other Losses"

Each week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is "Other Losses: An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans After World War II," written by James Bacque, and published in 1989.

This highly controversial book argued that General Dwight D. Eisenhower deliberately caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of German prisoners of war (POWs) in Allied-run camps in the aftermath of World War II. Bacque claimed that these deaths resulted from a combination of deliberate policies of deprivation, inadequate food rations, exposure and mistreatment. Bacque essentially alleged a shocking war crime, one that historians had for decades resolutely overlooked.

Bacque based much of his work on declassified Allied documents and German sources, arguing that these records had been misinterpreted or ignored by mainstream historians. His central claim was that approximately 800,000 to over 1 million German POWs died due to starvation, disease and exposure, and that Eisenhower’s policies were largely responsible.

Bacque’s argument was based on several claims:

First, Bacque alleged that Eisenhower had reclassified German POWs as "Disarmed Enemy Forces" (DEFs), not as prisoners of war. This enabled the Americans to get around the requirements of the Geneva Conventions that they provide their prisoners adequate food, shelter and medical care.

Second, Bacque claimed that food supplies to these camps were deliberately restricted by Allied authorities, leading to widespread malnutrition and starvation. He cited sources claiming that ration levels for German prisoners were significantly lower than those given to prisoners in Nazi concentration camps.

Bacque also alleged that official death tolls were manipulated or understated by Western historians. He claimed that documents were classified or deliberately altered to minimize the scale of the deaths.

The title of Bacque's book, "Other Losses," refers to a category in Allied records listing prisoner statistics. Bacque claimed that many of the deaths were not recorded, but were instead disguised as falling under this bureaucratic rubric.

Needless to say, Bacque's book came under ferocious attack. Historians disputed his claim that more than 800,000 German POWs died in Allied captivity. They estimated the German POW deaths as falling between 56,000 and 100,000, primarily due to disease and shortages. Historians also disputed Bacque's interpretation of the term "Other Losses" in the official records. According to the historians, in U.S. Army records, “Other Losses” did not refer to deaths, but rather to prisoners transferred or released or to prisoners who had escaped.

Above all, Bacque's critics rejected his claim that Eisenhower or Allied leadership intentionally sought to exterminate German POWs. While conditions in the camps were undoubtedly harsh, critics argued that logistical challenges, food shortages and the devastation of war-torn Europe played a much larger role in German deaths in captivity than any deliberate policy of starvation.

One commentator who defended Bacque's work was Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, who served as the first U.N. Independent Expert on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order from 2012 to 2018. De Zayas has written extensively on the post-war expulsion of Germans from Eastern Europe and on Allied war crimes.

While not fully endorsing Bacque’s numbers, de Zayas acknowledged that conditions in the camps were very harsh and that there was neglect by the Allies. He argued moreover that mainstream historians had been too dismissive of the idea that the Western Allies engaged in serious mistreatment of German POWs or in war crimes in general.

However, de Zayas did not go so far as to support Bacque’s claim that this mistreatment was a deliberate act of extermination ordered by Eisenhower.

Whatever one thinks of Bacque's claims, "Other Losses" is an important work highlighting events that few had pain any attention to, namely, the treatment of a defeated people whose fate no one cared very much about. If only some of Bacque's claims are true, then the Allied powers had perpetrated a massive war crime.

James_Bacque_-_Other_Losses__The_Shocking_Truth_Behind_the_Mass_Deaths_Of_Disarmed_German_Soldiers_And_Civilians_Under_General_Eisenhower_s_Command-Prima_Publishing_(1989).pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Monday Night At The Movies: "Les Diaboliques" (1955)

Join Gagglers for "Les Diaboliques"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

01:57:11
The Gaggle Music Club: Maurice Ravel’s Le Tombeau de Couperin

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Maurice Ravel’s Le Tombeau de Couperin. Composed between 1914 and 1917, the piece is one of Ravel's most poignant works. It is both a personal elegy and a musical homage. Ravel wrote it originally for the piano, but he later orchestrated four of its six movements.

Ravel began composing the piece before the First World War, but its final shape was affected by the war. The word tombeau in French Baroque music denotes a musical memorial. The piece however is not solely a tribute to François Couperin, the great French Baroque composer. It’s a broader homage to the French clavecinist tradition of the 18th century — including Jean-Henri D’Anglebert and Jean-Philippe Rameau.

More personally, each movement is dedicated to a friend of Ravel's who had died in the war. Ravel served in the war as a truck driver and lost many friends. He said of the suite: “The dead are sad enough, in their eternal silence.”

The work is neo-classical, ...

00:18:41
TG 1928: Tulsi Gabbard Discloses RussiaGate Receipts: Will It Make A Difference?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's presentation of the case that the RussiaGate hoax was from the start a treasonous plot masterminded by President Barack Obama himself. Will the disclosure however make a difference?

00:43:35
13 hours ago
12 hours ago
post photo preview
17 hours ago

"We're cooked, chat"

Up to 2018 the peer-reviewed literature on geomagnetic excursions (magnetic pole shifts) was about 60/40 in favor of "these cause extinctions" vs "these do not cause extinctions".

Since 2019, it has been 95/5 in favor of biosphere devastation. We are less than 25 years from the next one; here are the best 5 papers in that time confirming just how f***ed we are:

Channell, J. E. T., & Vigliotti, L. (2019). The role of geomagnetic field intensity in late Quaternary evolution of humans and large mammals. Reviews of Geophysics, 57(3), 709–738. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000629

Cooper, A., Turney, C. S. M., et al. (2021). A global environmental crisis 42,000 years ago. Science, 371(6531), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb8677

Arsenović, P., Rozanov, E., et al. (2024). Global impacts of an extreme solar particle event under different geomagnetic field strengths. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(28), e2321770121. ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals