TheGaggle
News • Politics • Culture
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
February 09, 2025
The Gaggle Book Club: "The Affirmative Action Empire" by Terry Martin

Each week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is "The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939," by Terry Martin. Published in 2001, the book is a major study of Soviet nationality policy in the interwar period. Martin challenges conventional view that the Soviet Union was the continuation of the Russian empire. To the contrary: he argues that the Soviet leaders implemented policies that actively promoted the cultural and political development of the non-Russian nationalities. Hence Martin's nomenclature: "the world's first affirmative action state."

According to Martin, the early Soviet state, sought to institutionalize and promote non-Russian national identities rather than suppress them. The Bolsheviks believed nationalism was a necessary transitional stage before reaching a communist, internationalist society. The goal was to modernize, educate and politically mobilize non-Russian ethnic groups while simultaneously fostering a Soviet identity.

Most important: early Soviet policies were designed not only to promote non-Russian national identities but also actively to downgrade Russian nationalism. This was part of the broader Bolshevik strategy to undermine traditional imperial structures and prevent any one ethnic group—especially the Russians—from dominating the new Soviet state. Martin emphasizes that Lenin and other early Bolshevik leaders saw Russian nationalism as a dangerous, reactionary force that could undermine their vision of a multiethnic, socialist state.

Since the Russian Empire had been dominated by ethnic Russians, there was a strong push to break Russian nationalist dominance and prevent a resurgence of Russian imperial thinking. In the Bolshevik worldview, nationalism was seen as a transitional stage on the way to international communism.

However, the Bolsheviks made a distinction: Non-Russian nationalism (Ukrainian, Georgian, Kazakh, etc.) was seen as potentially progressive, because it helped break the hold of Russian imperial rule. Russian nationalism, on the other hand, was seen as reactionary, since it was supposedly tied to Tsarist imperialism.

The Bolsheviks feared that Russian dominance would alienate non-Russian populations and push them toward anti-Soviet nationalist movements.
The korenizatsiya (nativization) policy aimed to promote local languages, cultures and elites in the non-Russian republics. National languages were made official in government and education. Indigenous elites were trained and placed in administrative positions, replacing Russian officials.

New republics, autonomous regions and ethnic-based territorial units were established, reinforcing the Soviet Union’s multiethnic structure.

Martin documents how the Soviet government deliberately weakened Russian cultural and political dominance during the korenizatsiya period. For example, Russian was not made the mandatory state language in the 1920s; local languages were promoted instead. There were explicit propaganda campaigns against "Great Russian chauvinism," which was seen as a threat to socialist unity.

Martin argues that, in a way, the USSR functioned as a kind of "anti-Russian Empire"—it was built on the ruins of the Tsarist system but was designed to prevent Russian ethnic dominance over other nationalities. The goal was to create a new supranational Soviet identity that would eventually replace both Russian and non-Russian nationalism.

To be sure, by the mid-1930s, Stalin moved away from indigenization policies and re-centralized power. While the Soviet Union remained officially multinational, the Russian language and culture regained dominance. The purges of the late 1930s disproportionately targeted non-Russian elites, reversing earlier affirmative action policies. The Soviet state increasingly promoted the Russian language as the common language of the USSR. Russian cultural and historical achievements were celebrated more openly. During the Great Patriotic War, Stalin fully embraced Russian nationalism as a unifying force.

Martin convincingly argues that the early Soviet state was actively anti-Russian nationalist in its policies, aiming to dismantle alleged Russian imperial dominance and promote local national identities. Save for the brief late-Stalin period, the USSR remained committed to an anti-Russia nationalist policy.

Khrushchev encouraged greater use of local languages in education and administration. Under Khrushchev and his successors non-Russians were increasingly promoted to leadership positions within the republics. Unlike Stalin, who had allowed some level of Russian Orthodox Church activity (especially during WWII), Khrushchev intensified anti-religious campaigns, shutting down churches and religious institutions across the USSR—including in Russia itself. By the late Brezhnev era, nationalism in the republics was growing, and the Kremlin did little to discourage it.

Martin's book is a fascinating account of how a rabidly anti-Russian group too over in Russia and set about dismantling the Russian language, culture, history and traditions. There's a lesson there somewhere.

Terry_Martin_The_Affirmative_Action_Empire_(The_Wilder_House_Series_in_Politics,_History_and_Culture)_Terry_Martin_-_The_Affirmative_Action_Empire__Nations_and_Nationalism_in_the_Soviet_Union,_1923-1939-Cornell_University_Press_(2001).pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Monday Night At The Movies: "Brazil" (1985)

"Brazil" starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

02:23:26
February 09, 2025
TG 1809: What's The Fight Between Elon Musk And Steve Bannon Really About?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the growing rift in MAGA world between Elon Musk and Steve Bannon, and agree that the outcome of their clash will likely decide the fate of populism in America and, ultimately, the fate of the Trump presidency.

00:51:04
February 09, 2025
TG 1808: Baltic States Cut Themselves Off From Russia's Electricity Grid

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the EU's rejoicing over the Baltic states' severance from Russia's electricity grid. The results are likely to be sharply higher prices for consumers--not an issue of much concern to the EU.

01:10:55
February 09, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies: "Brazil" (1985)

Dear Gagglers:

Monday is, and has always been, a profoundly depressing day. That's why we have decided to add a little bit of fun to it.

On Monday, Feb. 10, we are holding another film screening. Gagglers can watch a movie and, as they do so, offer comments, random thoughts, aesthetic observations and critical insights in the Live Chat.

We will be screening the winner of The Gaggle's "utopia and dystopia" movie poll: Terry Gilliam's 1985 dark comedy "Brazil," starring Jonathan Pryce, Robert de Niro, Bob Hoskins, Ian Holm and Michael Palin.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088846/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0_tt_8_nm_0_in_0_q_brazil
The film will starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.

Please continue to vote in the poll. We will be screening the runner-up on Feb. 17.

See you at the movies.

Michael Tracey

@mtracey

·

5 h

Trump now says that unless Hamas releases all remaining hostages by Saturday at noon, Israel may resume the war and "let hell break out." Looks like he's intentionally blowing up the ceasefire framework, shortly after transferring 2,000 pound bombs to Netanyahu

World War Now:
🇺🇸⚡️- President Trump was interviewed on FOX News today by Bret Baier.

“Do you see J.D. Vance as your successor?” He was asked.

“No.” President Trump responded.

🇺🇸🇵🇸🇮🇱⚡️- BREAKING: President Trump says he will cancel the Gaza ceasefire if all hostages aren’t released by 12PM on Saturday.

🇺🇸🇪🇬🇯🇴⚡️- “I may stop aid to Egypt and Jordan if they don’t accept refugees from Gaza.” - Donald Trump, US President.

🇵🇸❌🇮🇱🇺🇸 — Full statement of Trump, he says all hostages must be released by Saturday and not just the 3 that were delayed.

17 hours ago

Let's make this easy for Trump Cult members to understand. The Orange Fella and The Yogi Bear looking fella are under the control of these Lurianic Kabbalah Hassidic Jewish fellas, ordered to do everything to bring about their Messianic new Golden Age, which means death to you and your loved ones and the fall of the West (Edom) It really is that simple. https://x.com/WTAFRich/status/1889012752032907512

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals