TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
February 09, 2025
The Gaggle Book Club: "The Affirmative Action Empire" by Terry Martin

Each week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is "The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939," by Terry Martin. Published in 2001, the book is a major study of Soviet nationality policy in the interwar period. Martin challenges conventional view that the Soviet Union was the continuation of the Russian empire. To the contrary: he argues that the Soviet leaders implemented policies that actively promoted the cultural and political development of the non-Russian nationalities. Hence Martin's nomenclature: "the world's first affirmative action state."

According to Martin, the early Soviet state, sought to institutionalize and promote non-Russian national identities rather than suppress them. The Bolsheviks believed nationalism was a necessary transitional stage before reaching a communist, internationalist society. The goal was to modernize, educate and politically mobilize non-Russian ethnic groups while simultaneously fostering a Soviet identity.

Most important: early Soviet policies were designed not only to promote non-Russian national identities but also actively to downgrade Russian nationalism. This was part of the broader Bolshevik strategy to undermine traditional imperial structures and prevent any one ethnic group—especially the Russians—from dominating the new Soviet state. Martin emphasizes that Lenin and other early Bolshevik leaders saw Russian nationalism as a dangerous, reactionary force that could undermine their vision of a multiethnic, socialist state.

Since the Russian Empire had been dominated by ethnic Russians, there was a strong push to break Russian nationalist dominance and prevent a resurgence of Russian imperial thinking. In the Bolshevik worldview, nationalism was seen as a transitional stage on the way to international communism.

However, the Bolsheviks made a distinction: Non-Russian nationalism (Ukrainian, Georgian, Kazakh, etc.) was seen as potentially progressive, because it helped break the hold of Russian imperial rule. Russian nationalism, on the other hand, was seen as reactionary, since it was supposedly tied to Tsarist imperialism.

The Bolsheviks feared that Russian dominance would alienate non-Russian populations and push them toward anti-Soviet nationalist movements.
The korenizatsiya (nativization) policy aimed to promote local languages, cultures and elites in the non-Russian republics. National languages were made official in government and education. Indigenous elites were trained and placed in administrative positions, replacing Russian officials.

New republics, autonomous regions and ethnic-based territorial units were established, reinforcing the Soviet Union’s multiethnic structure.

Martin documents how the Soviet government deliberately weakened Russian cultural and political dominance during the korenizatsiya period. For example, Russian was not made the mandatory state language in the 1920s; local languages were promoted instead. There were explicit propaganda campaigns against "Great Russian chauvinism," which was seen as a threat to socialist unity.

Martin argues that, in a way, the USSR functioned as a kind of "anti-Russian Empire"—it was built on the ruins of the Tsarist system but was designed to prevent Russian ethnic dominance over other nationalities. The goal was to create a new supranational Soviet identity that would eventually replace both Russian and non-Russian nationalism.

To be sure, by the mid-1930s, Stalin moved away from indigenization policies and re-centralized power. While the Soviet Union remained officially multinational, the Russian language and culture regained dominance. The purges of the late 1930s disproportionately targeted non-Russian elites, reversing earlier affirmative action policies. The Soviet state increasingly promoted the Russian language as the common language of the USSR. Russian cultural and historical achievements were celebrated more openly. During the Great Patriotic War, Stalin fully embraced Russian nationalism as a unifying force.

Martin convincingly argues that the early Soviet state was actively anti-Russian nationalist in its policies, aiming to dismantle alleged Russian imperial dominance and promote local national identities. Save for the brief late-Stalin period, the USSR remained committed to an anti-Russia nationalist policy.

Khrushchev encouraged greater use of local languages in education and administration. Under Khrushchev and his successors non-Russians were increasingly promoted to leadership positions within the republics. Unlike Stalin, who had allowed some level of Russian Orthodox Church activity (especially during WWII), Khrushchev intensified anti-religious campaigns, shutting down churches and religious institutions across the USSR—including in Russia itself. By the late Brezhnev era, nationalism in the republics was growing, and the Kremlin did little to discourage it.

Martin's book is a fascinating account of how a rabidly anti-Russian group too over in Russia and set about dismantling the Russian language, culture, history and traditions. There's a lesson there somewhere.

Terry_Martin_The_Affirmative_Action_Empire_(The_Wilder_House_Series_in_Politics,_History_and_Culture)_Terry_Martin_-_The_Affirmative_Action_Empire__Nations_and_Nationalism_in_the_Soviet_Union,_1923-1939-Cornell_University_Press_(2001).pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1969: First Amendment Hypocrisy: Media Meltdown Over Jimmy Kimmel's Firing

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the extraordinary hypocrisy of yesterday's censors--much of mainstream media--posing as today's First Amendment champions--and all because one of their own--Jimmy Kimmel--has just been suspended by ABC.

01:26:06
September 15, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Brahms’s Piano Quartet in G minor, As Orchestrated By Arnold Schoenberg

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Brahms’s Piano Quartet in G minor, Op. 25, as orchestrated by Arnold Schoenberg.

Johannes Brahms composed his Piano Quartet in G minor, Op. 25, between 1856 and 1861. It is understandable why Schoenberg was eager to orchestrate it. The quartet is a dramatic and expansive chamber work. It is made up of four movements, culminating in the famous “Rondo alla Zingarese.” Clara Schumann, Brahms’s lifelong friend and confidante, had described the piano quartet as “symphonic in breadth and power.” According to her, the quartet’s length (almost 50 minutes), the weight of its four movements and the sheer intensity of the piano part went beyond the intimate scope of chamber music.

The quartet premiered in Hamburg in 1861, with Clara herself playing the piano part in subsequent performances. Even before Schoenberg, musicians had made attempts to turn the quartet into a symphonic work. Friedrich Hermann (a Leipzig violinist and arranger) ...

00:48:43
Live Chat
September 15, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies: "L'Avventura" (1960)

Join Gagglers for "L'Avventura"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

02:23:06
September 17, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Sept. 22.

The theme is "shaking up the convention of the Whodunit--calling into question who's victim, who's suspect, who's investigator."

Please continue to vote after Sept. 22, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Sept. 29.

September 18, 2025

World War Now:
🇺🇸❌🇷🇺 — US President Donald Trump says Russian President Vladimir Putin has "let me down" when commenting on the war in Ukraine.

🔗 Sky News (@SkyNews)

🇺🇸❌🇷🇺 — US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer are asked about the war in Ukraine - with Trump saying the world was heading towards 'World War III'.

"The Russia situation... I hope we are going to have some good news for you."

🔗 Sky News (@SkyNews)

#BREAKING | Trump says If oil price drops, Putin will have "no choice" but to end the war.

The Global Eye | Subscribe

🇷🇺⚡️- "It is possible to consider returning the name Stalingrad to Volgograd," - Vladimir Putin, President of Russia.

🇺🇸🇬🇧🇺🇦⚡- "We will sell NATO countries large quantities of weapons for Ukraine," - President Donald Trump.

🇺🇸🇬🇧🇵🇸⚡- "October 7 is one of the worst and most violent days in world history," - President Donald Trump.

🇺🇸🇬🇧🇵🇸⚡- "I ...

23 hours ago

I received my Swiss voting ballot a few weeks ago for the vote on September 28th, 2025, when Swiss voters can decide whether they want to accept a digital ID. https://open.substack.com/pub/anitabaxasmd/p/the-swiss-are-voting-on-the-digital?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=o786d

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals