TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
February 09, 2025
The Gaggle Book Club: "The Affirmative Action Empire" by Terry Martin

Each week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is "The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939," by Terry Martin. Published in 2001, the book is a major study of Soviet nationality policy in the interwar period. Martin challenges conventional view that the Soviet Union was the continuation of the Russian empire. To the contrary: he argues that the Soviet leaders implemented policies that actively promoted the cultural and political development of the non-Russian nationalities. Hence Martin's nomenclature: "the world's first affirmative action state."

According to Martin, the early Soviet state, sought to institutionalize and promote non-Russian national identities rather than suppress them. The Bolsheviks believed nationalism was a necessary transitional stage before reaching a communist, internationalist society. The goal was to modernize, educate and politically mobilize non-Russian ethnic groups while simultaneously fostering a Soviet identity.

Most important: early Soviet policies were designed not only to promote non-Russian national identities but also actively to downgrade Russian nationalism. This was part of the broader Bolshevik strategy to undermine traditional imperial structures and prevent any one ethnic group—especially the Russians—from dominating the new Soviet state. Martin emphasizes that Lenin and other early Bolshevik leaders saw Russian nationalism as a dangerous, reactionary force that could undermine their vision of a multiethnic, socialist state.

Since the Russian Empire had been dominated by ethnic Russians, there was a strong push to break Russian nationalist dominance and prevent a resurgence of Russian imperial thinking. In the Bolshevik worldview, nationalism was seen as a transitional stage on the way to international communism.

However, the Bolsheviks made a distinction: Non-Russian nationalism (Ukrainian, Georgian, Kazakh, etc.) was seen as potentially progressive, because it helped break the hold of Russian imperial rule. Russian nationalism, on the other hand, was seen as reactionary, since it was supposedly tied to Tsarist imperialism.

The Bolsheviks feared that Russian dominance would alienate non-Russian populations and push them toward anti-Soviet nationalist movements.
The korenizatsiya (nativization) policy aimed to promote local languages, cultures and elites in the non-Russian republics. National languages were made official in government and education. Indigenous elites were trained and placed in administrative positions, replacing Russian officials.

New republics, autonomous regions and ethnic-based territorial units were established, reinforcing the Soviet Union’s multiethnic structure.

Martin documents how the Soviet government deliberately weakened Russian cultural and political dominance during the korenizatsiya period. For example, Russian was not made the mandatory state language in the 1920s; local languages were promoted instead. There were explicit propaganda campaigns against "Great Russian chauvinism," which was seen as a threat to socialist unity.

Martin argues that, in a way, the USSR functioned as a kind of "anti-Russian Empire"—it was built on the ruins of the Tsarist system but was designed to prevent Russian ethnic dominance over other nationalities. The goal was to create a new supranational Soviet identity that would eventually replace both Russian and non-Russian nationalism.

To be sure, by the mid-1930s, Stalin moved away from indigenization policies and re-centralized power. While the Soviet Union remained officially multinational, the Russian language and culture regained dominance. The purges of the late 1930s disproportionately targeted non-Russian elites, reversing earlier affirmative action policies. The Soviet state increasingly promoted the Russian language as the common language of the USSR. Russian cultural and historical achievements were celebrated more openly. During the Great Patriotic War, Stalin fully embraced Russian nationalism as a unifying force.

Martin convincingly argues that the early Soviet state was actively anti-Russian nationalist in its policies, aiming to dismantle alleged Russian imperial dominance and promote local national identities. Save for the brief late-Stalin period, the USSR remained committed to an anti-Russia nationalist policy.

Khrushchev encouraged greater use of local languages in education and administration. Under Khrushchev and his successors non-Russians were increasingly promoted to leadership positions within the republics. Unlike Stalin, who had allowed some level of Russian Orthodox Church activity (especially during WWII), Khrushchev intensified anti-religious campaigns, shutting down churches and religious institutions across the USSR—including in Russia itself. By the late Brezhnev era, nationalism in the republics was growing, and the Kremlin did little to discourage it.

Martin's book is a fascinating account of how a rabidly anti-Russian group too over in Russia and set about dismantling the Russian language, culture, history and traditions. There's a lesson there somewhere.

Terry_Martin_The_Affirmative_Action_Empire_(The_Wilder_House_Series_in_Politics,_History_and_Culture)_Terry_Martin_-_The_Affirmative_Action_Empire__Nations_and_Nationalism_in_the_Soviet_Union,_1923-1939-Cornell_University_Press_(2001).pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2165: Ian Proud: Where Did All The Diplomats Go?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle sat down for a conversation with long-serving former UK diplomat Ian Proud to discuss: Whatever happened to the craft of diplomacy, a skill Europeans, including the British, once possessed in abundance?

To order Ian Proud's novel: https://www.waterstones.com/book/searching/ian-t-proud/9781739543136

00:50:25
TG 2164: Putin Warns West: "You Seize Our Ships, We Seize Yours"

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Russian President Putin's stark warning to the West: Russia will retaliate against any seizure of Russian vessels by Western countries by seizure of Western vessels.

00:54:24
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Body Heat" (1981)

Join Gagglers for "Body Heat"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

01:53:12
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Aug. 10.

To mark the dog-days of August, the theme of this poll is heatwaves and extreme heat in films.

Please continue to vote in this poll after Aug. 10, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Aug. 17.

11 minutes ago

The Trump and Witkoff families are opening a bank in Florida. The investors in this bank are undisclosed. It will not have to follow FDIC rules.

I smell a money-laundering opportunity.
https://x.com/PiperK/status/2088517170770931770?s=20

Amid the narrative that the "US is losing" or "run by Israel" —there are no serious attempts to understand Washington's grand strategy.

On the Substack charts for 4 months straight: how the US took on Iran, Venezuela, Russia and seized the planet's fuel.
https://x.com/richimedhurst/status/2088404648793121182?s=20

This Caused CONTROVERSY - Russia's Opposition Has NO Strategy to END the War!

Silicon Curtain

192K subscribers

Aug 14, 2026

DESCRIPTION: Nigel Gould-Davies on the Russian Exiled Opposition: Sanctions, Strategy, and the War in Ukraine

Nigel Gould-Davies returns to discuss controversial articles he wrote about the Russian exiled opposition, arguing many share the radical goal of ending or “liquidating” the Putin regime yet lobby Western governments for restrained policies that undermine that objective. He critiques calls to narrow sanctions, push a postwar “Marshall Plan” for Russia, liberalize large-scale Russian immigration to Europe, and oppose transferring roughly $300B in frozen Russian central bank assets to Ukraine, contending these steps would aid Russia’s war capacity and pose counterintelligence risks. Gould-Davies stresses sanctions are essential to constraining the Russian war machine and that easing them would increase ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals