TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Music Club: Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 16 in F Major, Op. 135

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 16 in F Major, Op. 135. Composed in October 1826, the piece is Beethoven's final complete work.

This quartet belongs to Beethoven's late period, a phase characterized by intense structural innovation and introspection. Unlike the preceding five quartets of this period (Ops. 127, 130, 131, 132 and 133), which are monumental in scale and complexity, Op. 135 is notably lighter, more classical in proportion and almost playful in spirit.

The work was commissioned by Johann Nepomuk Wolfmayer, a wealthy Viennese merchant who had supported Beethoven in the past. By the time of its composition, Beethoven had already suffered the failure of his Grosse Fuge (originally the finale of Op. 130), which was deemed too difficult for audiences. He had also been dealing with legal disputes concerning his nephew Karl, whose suicide attempt in August 1826 greatly distressed the composer. Despite these stresses, Op. 135 is unexpectedly lighthearted and even humorous.

The most famous feature of the quartet is its finale, marked "Der schwer gefasste Entschluss" ("The difficult resolution" ), in which Beethoven inscribes the words "Muss es sein?" ("Must it be?" ) and "Es muss sein!" ("It must be!" ) over the respective musical themes. The origins of this phrase likely stem from an inside joke among Beethoven’s circle concerning an unpaid debt. However, its placement in the quartet transforms it into a philosophical question, emblematic of Beethoven’s tendency to imbue his music with philosophic themes.

Op. 135 occupies an interesting place in Beethoven’s output. Unlike the grand, quasi-symphonic string quartets ops. 130, 131, and 132, which push the limits of form, Op. 135 returns to a more Classical model, presenting a compact, witty and emotionally balanced work. The work almost recalls the spirit of Beethoven’s early quartets and his middle-period clarity, yet with the harmonic subtlety and depth of his late style.

While many of Beethoven’s late works seem to push toward abstraction and the dissolution of traditional structures (e.g., Op. 131’s continuous movements, Op. 133’s fugue), Op. 135 seems to accept the Classical tradition while subtly transforming it. The brevity of its movements, the playful yet profound nature of its finale, and the directness of its themes suggest a composer who—after years of breaking musical conventions—chooses to reaffirm the classical ideals in his final chamber work.

Though structurally Classical, Op. 135’s harmonic nuances, expressive slow movement and enigmatic elements (e.g., “Muss es sein?”) foreshadow the Romantic era’s emphasis on expression and meaning. The compactness and economy of Op. 135’s movements anticipate the 20th-century ideals of composers like Bartók and Webern, who valued conciseness and thematic transformation.

Op. 135 is both a farewell and a reaffirmation. It acknowledges the weight of Beethoven’s musical and personal struggles but embraces a lightness and clarity that suggest a quiet acceptance of fate. While less musically daring than his other late quartets, its subtlety and wit ensure its lasting influence.

Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 16 in F Major, Op. 135 is performed by the Ariel Quartet.

00:26:54
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1905: U.S. Readies To Attack Iran; Question Remains: Why?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the apparent preparations the United States is making to launch attacks on Iran, and try to answer the baffling question: Why?

01:53:50
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Tout Va Bien" (1972)

Join Gagglers for the screening of the runner-up in The Gaggle's "France and the spirit of 1968" poll: Jean-Luc Godard's "Tout Va Bien"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

01:35:39
The Gaggle Music Club: Darius Milhaud's "La Création Du Monde"

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Darius Milhaud’s "La création du monde." Composed in 1923, the ballet in one act, is based on African creation myths, and is a pivotal work of early 20th-century music. It synthesizes African myth, jazz idioms and classical form.

Darius Milhaud (1892–1974) was born in Aix-en-Provence, France, into a Provençal Jewish family. He studied at the Paris Conservatoire, where he came under the influence of Charles-Marie Widor, Vincent d’Indy and Paul Dukas, but soon forged his own style, emphasizing polytonality (simultaneous use of multiple keys) and rhythmic energy.

Milhaud was a central figure in the composer collective Les Six, along with Francis Poulenc, Arthur Honegger, Georges Auric, Louis Durey, and Germaine Tailleferre. Les Six were not bound by a formal manifesto. They did not compose in the same style or even collaborate extensively. They objected to what they deemed to be Wagner’s heaviness and Debussy and Ravel’s dreamy impressionism....

00:17:03
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, June 23.

The theme is "Peacetime Army Life."

Please continue to vote after June 9, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on June 30.

Boris Ivanov
·
Following
Studied History & Literature at Russian State University for the HumanitiesJun 8
How accurate is the claim that Vladimir Putin offered to negotiate a peace deal between President Trump and Elon Musk?

That’s not true. Former president Medvedev offered to do that, in exchange for shares of Starlink. That was, of course, trolling. These days, Medvedev is primarily known as an online troll, although he is also Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia. We don’t take most of his musings seriously.

World War Now:
🇺🇸 US President Donald Trump could fire Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard over a ( allegedly ) false report on Iran's nuclear program.

According to CBS, CIA Director John Ratcliffe met with Trump at the White House and presented him with evidence that Iran is supposedly weeks away from having a nuclear bomb.

@CIG_telegram

🇺🇸🇮🇷Today, reports began circulating on social media claiming that the United States is considering the use of tactical nuclear weapons against heavily fortified Iranian targets. These claims were allegedly attributed to coverage by Fox News.

However, Fox has clarified that the nuclear speculation did not originate with them but instead stemmed primarily from the British press.

These reports come amid growing concerns that U.S. conventional bunker-buster bombs may be insufficient to destroy Iran’s heavily protected Fordow nuclear facility—adding to the gravity of the situation.

⚡️🇮🇱🇮🇷 Iranian air defenses ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals