TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Music Club: Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 16 in F Major, Op. 135

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 16 in F Major, Op. 135. Composed in October 1826, the piece is Beethoven's final complete work.

This quartet belongs to Beethoven's late period, a phase characterized by intense structural innovation and introspection. Unlike the preceding five quartets of this period (Ops. 127, 130, 131, 132 and 133), which are monumental in scale and complexity, Op. 135 is notably lighter, more classical in proportion and almost playful in spirit.

The work was commissioned by Johann Nepomuk Wolfmayer, a wealthy Viennese merchant who had supported Beethoven in the past. By the time of its composition, Beethoven had already suffered the failure of his Grosse Fuge (originally the finale of Op. 130), which was deemed too difficult for audiences. He had also been dealing with legal disputes concerning his nephew Karl, whose suicide attempt in August 1826 greatly distressed the composer. Despite these stresses, Op. 135 is unexpectedly lighthearted and even humorous.

The most famous feature of the quartet is its finale, marked "Der schwer gefasste Entschluss" ("The difficult resolution" ), in which Beethoven inscribes the words "Muss es sein?" ("Must it be?" ) and "Es muss sein!" ("It must be!" ) over the respective musical themes. The origins of this phrase likely stem from an inside joke among Beethoven’s circle concerning an unpaid debt. However, its placement in the quartet transforms it into a philosophical question, emblematic of Beethoven’s tendency to imbue his music with philosophic themes.

Op. 135 occupies an interesting place in Beethoven’s output. Unlike the grand, quasi-symphonic string quartets ops. 130, 131, and 132, which push the limits of form, Op. 135 returns to a more Classical model, presenting a compact, witty and emotionally balanced work. The work almost recalls the spirit of Beethoven’s early quartets and his middle-period clarity, yet with the harmonic subtlety and depth of his late style.

While many of Beethoven’s late works seem to push toward abstraction and the dissolution of traditional structures (e.g., Op. 131’s continuous movements, Op. 133’s fugue), Op. 135 seems to accept the Classical tradition while subtly transforming it. The brevity of its movements, the playful yet profound nature of its finale, and the directness of its themes suggest a composer who—after years of breaking musical conventions—chooses to reaffirm the classical ideals in his final chamber work.

Though structurally Classical, Op. 135’s harmonic nuances, expressive slow movement and enigmatic elements (e.g., “Muss es sein?”) foreshadow the Romantic era’s emphasis on expression and meaning. The compactness and economy of Op. 135’s movements anticipate the 20th-century ideals of composers like Bartók and Webern, who valued conciseness and thematic transformation.

Op. 135 is both a farewell and a reaffirmation. It acknowledges the weight of Beethoven’s musical and personal struggles but embraces a lightness and clarity that suggest a quiet acceptance of fate. While less musically daring than his other late quartets, its subtlety and wit ensure its lasting influence.

Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 16 in F Major, Op. 135 is performed by the Ariel Quartet.

00:26:54
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1923: Europe Eagerly Prepares For War With Russia

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the eagerness on the part of Europe's elite to settle for nothing short of full-scale war with Russia.

01:11:57
TG 1922: Strange Deal: Trump To "Sell" Weapons To Ukraine By Way Of NATO

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's forthcoming announcement of a "new policy" on Russia and Ukraine, as well as his plan to deliver weapons to Ukraine by way of selling them first to NATO, and then having NATO transfer them to Ukraine.

01:03:21
TG 1921: Has Trump Now Adopted Biden's Policy On Ukraine?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's recent tirades against Russian President Putin along with warm, complimentary noises about Ukrainian President Zelensky, and wonder whether the U.S. president has now abandoned the policy of America First and instead adopted the policy of Joe Biden.

00:59:14

Leisure-Maxxing: Why Great Men Are LAZY

Wisdom Warriors

62.3K subscribers

Subscribed

37,229 views Jul 9, 2025

🌟Talk to me 1-1 & come find your brothers: https://calendly.com/kristian-bell333...

We’ve been sold the lie that busyness is greatness—but the truth is, most geniuses were “lazy” by today’s standards. In this video, I break down the lost aristocratic virtue of leisure, why true insight comes from rest (not grind), and how to structure your life like Goethe, Nietzsche, and other timeless minds who mastered the art of doing less, but better.

20 hours ago
23 hours ago

World War Now:
🇮🇱❌🇮🇷 — In a letter to Iranian Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, Israel's former Defense Minister Yoav Galant says:

“We see everything in Iran.
We hear everything.
We are everywhere...

In more ways than one, we knew more about you than you knew about yourselves.”

Israeli Defense Minister Katz to Khamenei:

"If we have to return - we will return and with even greater force.

Israel's long arm will catch you in Tehran, Tabriz, Isfahan, and wherever you try to threaten and harm Israel from. There is no place where you can hide."

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals