TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Book Club: "Israel and the Bomb," by Avner Cohen

Each week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is "Israel and the Bomb," by Avner Cohen. Published by Columbia University Press in 1998, Cohen's book is a detailed history of one of the best-kept--or maybe worst-kept--secrets in history: Israel's possession of a formidable nuclear arsenal.

Israeli scholar Avner Cohen's book traces the development of Israel’s nuclear program from the late 1940s through to 1970, covering key political decisions, technological advances and international diplomacy.

Cohen argues that Israel’s nuclear ambitions began immediately after the state's creation, driven by Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion’s belief that nuclear weapons were essential for Israel’s survival. A key figure in this project was noted "Israeli dove" Shimon Peres, who played a critical role in securing French support for Israel’s nuclear program.

Cohen provides evidence that it was France that was Israel’s key nuclear patron, particularly in the wake of the 1956 Suez Crisis, when Israel collaborated with France and Britain in a military attack on Egypt, led at the time by by President Gamal Abdel Nasser. In 1957, France agreed to help Israel build a nuclear reactor at Dimona. The reactor's ostensible purpose was peaceful, but few doubted that the ultimate goal was to ensure that Israel would be able to produce its own nuclear weapons. France had a change of heart in 1962, under President Charles de Gaulle, and stopped their cooperation with Israel. But by then it was too late.

Cohen highlights the Kennedy administration’s attempts to inspect Dimona in the early 1960s. Israel, under Prime Minister Levi Eshkol, responded with deception tactics, allowing only superficial inspections and withholding key information. The Johnson administration took a more lenient approach, happily playing along with Israel’s now you see it/now you don't policy of nuclear ambiguity.

Cohen claims that Israel and the U.S. reached a secret understanding under President Nixon, allowing Israel to maintain nuclear weapons as long as it did not test them or declare itself publicly to be a nuclear power. This agreement institutionalized Israel’s policy of ambiguity, which remains in place to this day.

Why did this happen? Why did the United States abandon its publicly-stated nuclear non-proliferation goals when it came to Israel? According to Cohen, the United States had, by the late 1960s, come to see Israel as an important strategic ally in the Middle East. U.S. policymakers, particularly under Johnson and Nixon, preoccupied as they were with keeping the Soviet Union out of the Middle East, viewed Israel as a bulwark against Soviet encroachments in the region. Israel's triumph in the 1967 Six-Day War confirmed Israel’s formidable military prowess, and helped reinforce U.S. interest in deepening security cooperation with this newly-emerging regional superpower. There was correspondingly diminishing interest in confronting Israel over nuclear issues.

By the late 1960s, also, the pro-Israel lobby was becoming stronger in the U.S., making it politically costly for any administration to confront Israel over its nuclear ambitions. Key political figures in Congress were increasingly sympathetic to Israel’s alleged security concerns, reinforcing the idea that pressuring Israel on nuclear issues was not worth the political cost.

U.S. policymakers told themselves that an Israeli bomb was less destabilizing than a nuclear arms race involving Arab states. In any case, the policymakers reasoned, Arab states lacked the technological and financial capability to develop their own nuclear weapons in response to Israel’s. Washington also comforted itself with the belief that Israeli nuclear ambiguity would deter large-scale regional wars, as Arab states would hesitate to risk a conflict with an implicitly nuclear-armed Israel.

"Israel and the Bomb" remains one of the most important works on Israel’s nuclear history. While Cohen faced significant challenges due to Israel’s secrecy, his reliance on U.S. archives provided crucial insights into the diplomatic history of Israel’s nuclear program.

Cohen,_Avner_-_Israel_and_the_Bomb_(2005,_Columbia_University_Press)_-_libgen.li.pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1905: U.S. Readies To Attack Iran; Question Remains: Why?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the apparent preparations the United States is making to launch attacks on Iran, and try to answer the baffling question: Why?

01:53:50
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Tout Va Bien" (1972)

Join Gagglers for the screening of the runner-up in The Gaggle's "France and the spirit of 1968" poll: Jean-Luc Godard's "Tout Va Bien"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

01:35:39
The Gaggle Music Club: Darius Milhaud's "La Création Du Monde"

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Darius Milhaud’s "La création du monde." Composed in 1923, the ballet in one act, is based on African creation myths, and is a pivotal work of early 20th-century music. It synthesizes African myth, jazz idioms and classical form.

Darius Milhaud (1892–1974) was born in Aix-en-Provence, France, into a Provençal Jewish family. He studied at the Paris Conservatoire, where he came under the influence of Charles-Marie Widor, Vincent d’Indy and Paul Dukas, but soon forged his own style, emphasizing polytonality (simultaneous use of multiple keys) and rhythmic energy.

Milhaud was a central figure in the composer collective Les Six, along with Francis Poulenc, Arthur Honegger, Georges Auric, Louis Durey, and Germaine Tailleferre. Les Six were not bound by a formal manifesto. They did not compose in the same style or even collaborate extensively. They objected to what they deemed to be Wagner’s heaviness and Debussy and Ravel’s dreamy impressionism....

00:17:03
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, June 23.

The theme is "Peacetime Army Life."

Please continue to vote after June 9, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on June 30.

Boris Ivanov
·
Following
Studied History & Literature at Russian State University for the HumanitiesJun 8
How accurate is the claim that Vladimir Putin offered to negotiate a peace deal between President Trump and Elon Musk?

That’s not true. Former president Medvedev offered to do that, in exchange for shares of Starlink. That was, of course, trolling. These days, Medvedev is primarily known as an online troll, although he is also Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia. We don’t take most of his musings seriously.

World War Now:
🇺🇸 US President Donald Trump could fire Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard over a ( allegedly ) false report on Iran's nuclear program.

According to CBS, CIA Director John Ratcliffe met with Trump at the White House and presented him with evidence that Iran is supposedly weeks away from having a nuclear bomb.

@CIG_telegram

🇺🇸🇮🇷Today, reports began circulating on social media claiming that the United States is considering the use of tactical nuclear weapons against heavily fortified Iranian targets. These claims were allegedly attributed to coverage by Fox News.

However, Fox has clarified that the nuclear speculation did not originate with them but instead stemmed primarily from the British press.

These reports come amid growing concerns that U.S. conventional bunker-buster bombs may be insufficient to destroy Iran’s heavily protected Fordow nuclear facility—adding to the gravity of the situation.

⚡️🇮🇱🇮🇷 Iranian air defenses ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals