TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Music Club: Béla Bartók's Rhapsodies for Violin and Orchestra

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Béla Bartók’s Rhapsodies No. 1 & No. 2 for Violin and Orchestra.

Bartók composed his two rhapsodies in 1928, during a period when he was engaged in synthesizing folk music with classical music. The work is an outstanding example of Bartók's unique musical language: a blend of traditional Hungarian, Romanian and Slovak folk music with modernist techniques.

The Rhapsodies arose out of Bartók’s ethnomusicological studies. By the late 1920s, Bartók had collected and analyzed thousands of folk melodies from Hungary, Romania, Slovakia and Bulgaria, and he had already used this material in various compositions. The Rhapsodies are directly based on folk melodies, incorporating Hungarian and Romanian dance elements while employing Bartók’s modern harmonic and rhythmic innovations.

Bartók’s Rhapsodies are not simply arrangements of folk tunes; instead, they integrate folk idioms into a modern, highly sophisticated classical framework. The melodies may be authentic, but their harmonization, development and structure are highly original. Bartók does not simply harmonize folk melodies in a traditional Western style (as Brahms often did), but instead constructs new harmonic systems that derive from the original folk sources.

During the 1920s, Bartók moved away from his earlier expressionist and post-Romantic style (as seen in his early works, such as the opera "Bluebeard’s Castle" or the First String Quartet). Instead, he refined his synthesis of folk music, modernism and classical form. It culminated in later masterpieces such as Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta (1936) and the Concerto for Orchestra (1943-44).

The Rhapsodies fit into this transitional period as accessible, virtuosic works that showcase his love of folk music but are still within a broadly tonal and accessible to wider audiences. Unlike Bartók's later, more abstract works, the Rhapsodies maintain a strong improvisatory and performative character, making them at once emotionally engaging and even entertaining.

Unlike Bartók’s Romanian Folk Dances (1915), which are short, concise miniatures, the Rhapsodies are expansive and developmental. The Rhapsodies resemble Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsodies, but while Liszt’s works were often heavily romanticized, Bartók’s works remain close to the original folk sources.

Bartók’s Rhapsodies for Violin and Orchestra are a stunning fusion of folk music and classical virtuosity. They represent a transitional period in his career, during which he was moving toward greater abstraction but still deeply engaged in folk traditions. The Rhapsodies are among Bartók’s most accessible works, and a favorite of violinists.

In this performance, the George Enescu Philharmonic Orchestra is conducted by Alexander Walker, and the violin soloist is Mircea Calin.

00:25:08
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1844: Black Sea Grain Initiative Redux: Are We On The Road To Peace In Ukraine?

George Szamuely discusses the revival of the Black Sea Grain Initiative during discussions in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between the American and Russian negotiating teams, and wonders whether the Trump's sequencing of interim ceasefire agreements is likely to yield successful results.

00:34:22
TG 1843: SignalGate Latest: Jeffrey Goldberg Releases Missing Texts

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the fallout from Jeffrey Goldberg's disclosure of the Signal group chat among Trump administration national security principals, including his latest release of text messages supposedly containing classified information.

00:53:48
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "The Servant" (1963)

"The Servant" starts at 4 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

01:55:44
Monday Night At The Movies

Continuing with our theme of screening films that highlight a city, The Gaggle will during the next two weeks screen two films that feature Berlin.

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, March 31.

Please continue to vote after March 31, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on April 7.

ahahahahah pwned (vance is such a piece of shit anyway)
David Icke
@davidicke
Trump officials went door-to-door in Greenland to find anyone who wanted to be visited by the Vances and found no one. Travel company pulls out. Not everyone is a sycophant Mr Trump - hard as that is for you to believe given the super-sycophants you insist on surrounding you.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/greenland-usha-vance-visit-trump-b2722857.html

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals