TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Book Club: "The Politics Of War: The World And United States Foreign Policy, 1943–1945," By Gabriel Kolko

Each week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is Gabriel Kolko's "The Politics of War: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1943–1945." Published in 1968, Kolko's book is a seminal work of historical revisionism on the origins of the Cold War. Kolko had been a prominent figure among the so-called New Left historians who challenged the prevailing accounts of the origins of the post-World War II rift between the Soviet Union and the West.

Kolko's background was in economic and social history, not military or diplomatic history. His earlier works, such as "The Triumph of Conservatism" (1963), offered a critique the Progressive Era, arguing that the regulatory reforms that it instituted in reality served corporate interests. "The Politics of War" was in a sense a continuation of this argument.

Kolko examined the final years of World War II, asserting that U.S. foreign policy was predominantly driven by economic imperatives and a desire to shape a global order conducive to American capitalist interests. Kolko argued that the most important priority for U.S. policymakers was the establishment of a world order that favored free-market capitalism, one that ensured that U.S. businesses had access to markets and natural resources.

Kolko also contended that the United States worked to suppress leftist and communist movements globally, viewing them as threats to capitalist expansion. Thus, according to Kolko, the origins of the Cold War lay not in Soviet aggression or fear of a supposed Soviet threat. No, the Cold War was a consequence of U.S. efforts to dominate the postwar world economically and politically.

Kolko's work was groundbreaking in combining economic analysis with diplomatic history. Also original was his emphasis on the continuity between U.S. wartime policies and postwar objectives.

Kolko examined the Allied delay in opening a Western front in Europe, something the Soviet Union had been demanding since 1941 in order to alleviate Wehrmacht pressure on its forces. According to Kolko, the postponement until 1944 was not due not so much to logistical challenges as to the U.S. desire to see Soviet power degraded, and Soviet influence in postwar Europe diminished.

Kolko detailed the myriad ways the United States worked to suppress leftist and communist movements in Europe and Asia during and after the war. U.S. support for conservative and often authoritarian regimes, according to him, was driven by fear of the spread of socialism and by concern over threats to American economic interests.

Gabriel Kolko's "The Politics of War: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1943–1945" was an important and influential work. There are obvious weaknesses in the argument, and the crude Marxist scheme can be a little tiresome at times. However, it inspired a slew of revisionist historians who undermined the cozy, self-flattering myths of the Cold War. If you want to get a balanced understanding of the origins of the Cold War, this book is a must-read.

Gabriel_Kolko_-_The_Politics_of_War__The_World_and_United_States_Foreign_Policy,_1943-1945-Pantheon_(1990).pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2206: Last Chance For Peace: Melania Holds Court, Trump Meets Putin's Envoy

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the latest diplomatic maneuverings ahead of the big trilateral U.S.-Russia-Ukraine meeting next week in Abu Dhabi.

00:49:33
November 06, 2026
TG 2205: The Post-Trump Era Begins

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the aftermath of the GOP debacle, and try to chart the course of the new, post-Trump era.

01:01:19
November 04, 2026
TG 2204: Virág Gulyás: Hungary Has Succumbed To The Politics Of Gen Z

George Szamuely sat down for a conversation with political journalist Virág Gulyás about latest developments in Hungary and Europe.

01:01:37
15 hours ago

The AI layoff gamble is backfiring.

Companies that rushed to replace workers with AI are now cleaning up the mess, per The Guardian.

Meta scaled back plans to cut staff and use more AI agents after employees spent growing time cleaning up the agents’ technical and security errors. It’s now rehiring managers.
Microsoft and McKinsey are limiting employee AI use as costs pile up.
Walmart workers say AI scheduling and task tools set impossible standards and generate false alerts.

The payoff isn’t showing up: 90% of executives say AI hasn’t yet boosted productivity at their companies, per an Atlanta Fed working paper.

Yet more than 112,000 US job cuts this year have cited AI, per Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

I fully endorse this

BREAKING: Kamala Harris projected to announce another presidential run ahead of 2028 following Democrats' sweeping midterm victories.

60% chance.

🔗 https://polymarket.com/r/Kamala-28

13 hours ago

Look at this.

The odds of the AI bubble bursting are increasing at Polymarket, now up 27% after yesterday's trillion dollar wipeout.
Citat
Polymarket Money

@PolymarketMoney
·
6 nov.
BREAKING: Odds of an AI bubble collapse by mid-2027 surge after the Nasdaq 100 suffered a record $2.3 trillion wipeout in a single day.

27% chance.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals