TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Music Club: Johann Sebastian Bach’s Goldberg Variations

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Johann Sebastian Bach’s Goldberg Variations (BWV 988). Published in 1741, the Goldberg Variations is a monumental work of the Baroque period, characterized by technical brilliance, expressive range and structural ingenuity.

The work was published as the fourth and final part of Bach’s Clavier-Übung (Keyboard Practice), a series of works intended to demonstrate various aspects of keyboard technique and composition. It is named after Johann Gottlieb Goldberg, a young harpsichordist and a student of Bach's, who may also have been the first to perform it.

A famous—though possibly apocryphal—story, recounted by Bach’s early biographer Johann Nikolaus Forkel, claims that the work was commissioned by Count Hermann Karl von Keyserling, the Russian ambassador to Saxony. Suffering from insomnia, the count allegedly asked Bach to compose music that Goldberg could play to help him fall asleep.

Bach published the work himself under the title: Clavier-Übung bestehend in einer Aria mit verschiedenen Veränderungen vors Clavicimbal mit 2 Manualen (Keyboard Practice consisting of an Aria with diverse variations for harpsichord with two manuals).

The Goldberg Variations consists of an Aria (theme) at the beginning, 30 variations on the theme and a da capo return to the original Aria at the end. Contrary to common practice in variation forms, the variations here are not based on the melody of the Aria, but on its bass line and harmonic progression. This makes the work a set of bass variations, a form in which the underlying harmonic structure remains constant while the surface material changes dramatically.

The 30 variations are carefully organized. Every third variation is a canon. The other variations include: virtuosic toccata-style variations, dance forms, fugues, aria-like lyrical pieces.

The Aria itself is elegant, melancholy, stately, introspective and lyrical. The harmonic structure laid out in its 32 bars forms the basis for all 30 variations. The return of the Aria after 30 vastly different explorations gives the work a cyclical, almost metaphysical quality.

The combination of technical brilliance and spiritual introspection has led many to see it as not just a musical exercise, but as a journey of identity, transformation and return.

The Goldberg Variations stands at the summit of Bach’s keyboard writing. It represents his most ambitious work in variation form, and showcases the full range of Baroque keyboard techniques. It expresses perfectly the themes that ran throughout Bach’s life: polyphonic mastery, contrapuntal wit, spiritual intensity. It is also one of the last keyboard works that he published during his lifetime.

Bach's extraordinary composition redefined what the variation form could accomplish. While earlier composers had written variations on melodic themes, Bach’s use of a bass line as the invariant element allowed greater contrapuntal flexibility and depth. The intricate symmetry and mathematical rigor foreshadow modern compositional techniques such as those of the 20th-century serialists.

For much of the 18th and 19th centuries, the work was relatively neglected.
The 20th-century revival was driven largely by Glenn Gould, whose 1955 and 1981 recordings revolutionized how the piece was understood and performed, turning the piece into one of the most popular classical keyboard works.

The Goldberg Variations is a towering achievement in keyboard literature, blending intellectual rigor, emotional range and formal inventiveness. It remains one of the most studied, performed and beloved compositions in the classical canon.

Evgeni Koroliov is at the piano.

01:25:50
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Monday Night At The Movies: "Les Diaboliques" (1955)

Join Gagglers for "Les Diaboliques"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

01:57:11
The Gaggle Music Club: Maurice Ravel’s Le Tombeau de Couperin

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Maurice Ravel’s Le Tombeau de Couperin. Composed between 1914 and 1917, the piece is one of Ravel's most poignant works. It is both a personal elegy and a musical homage. Ravel wrote it originally for the piano, but he later orchestrated four of its six movements.

Ravel began composing the piece before the First World War, but its final shape was affected by the war. The word tombeau in French Baroque music denotes a musical memorial. The piece however is not solely a tribute to François Couperin, the great French Baroque composer. It’s a broader homage to the French clavecinist tradition of the 18th century — including Jean-Henri D’Anglebert and Jean-Philippe Rameau.

More personally, each movement is dedicated to a friend of Ravel's who had died in the war. Ravel served in the war as a truck driver and lost many friends. He said of the suite: “The dead are sad enough, in their eternal silence.”

The work is neo-classical, ...

00:18:41
TG 1928: Tulsi Gabbard Discloses RussiaGate Receipts: Will It Make A Difference?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's presentation of the case that the RussiaGate hoax was from the start a treasonous plot masterminded by President Barack Obama himself. Will the disclosure however make a difference?

00:43:35
13 hours ago
12 hours ago
post photo preview
17 hours ago

"We're cooked, chat"

Up to 2018 the peer-reviewed literature on geomagnetic excursions (magnetic pole shifts) was about 60/40 in favor of "these cause extinctions" vs "these do not cause extinctions".

Since 2019, it has been 95/5 in favor of biosphere devastation. We are less than 25 years from the next one; here are the best 5 papers in that time confirming just how f***ed we are:

Channell, J. E. T., & Vigliotti, L. (2019). The role of geomagnetic field intensity in late Quaternary evolution of humans and large mammals. Reviews of Geophysics, 57(3), 709–738. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000629

Cooper, A., Turney, C. S. M., et al. (2021). A global environmental crisis 42,000 years ago. Science, 371(6531), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb8677

Arsenović, P., Rozanov, E., et al. (2024). Global impacts of an extreme solar particle event under different geomagnetic field strengths. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(28), e2321770121. ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals