TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
14 hours ago

Roland Bartetzko
·
Follow
working with Ukrainian drone producersThu
What makes it so difficult for even top-tier military defenses to stop drone attacks like the one Ukraine launched?

The recent Ukrainian drone strikes that destroyed billions of dollars' worth of Russian military aircraft could have been easily avoided.

As we now know, Ukraine’s State Security Service, the SBU, used drones that were guided via a simple mobile phone data connection. Each drone had a SIM card from a Russian mobile phone provider and simply connected to a 4G or 5G data network when activated. Meanwhile, the SBU drone operators were safely sitting in a command center in Ukraine, sipping their coffee and causing mayhem for the Russian Air Force.

To stop these drones, all the Russians had to do was install a cell phone signal jammer. These relatively inexpensive devices have existed for many years. They are mostly used in facilities where mobile phone use is not allowed—for example, detention centers and secure compounds inside military bases.

All the Russians had to do was block a single frequency.

A crashed Ukrainian drone that uses a SIM card data connection for guidance. (Picture: GrandpaRoy)

The reasons they didn’t are simple: violation of the most basic security protocols, complacency, laziness, and, above all, a lack of imagination combined with a complete disregard for the enemy’s capabilities.

In short: idiots at work.

Now the Russians have woken up from their slumber—but it probably won’t help them avoid the next Ukrainian drone attack. Ukraine possesses far more capable drones than the ones used in this operation. Next time, we’ll most likely see a swarm of autonomous, AI-controlled drones that do not rely on data connections or human pilots. They’ll automatically search for, acquire, and destroy their targets.

The Russian military does not have the technology to defend against these new threats. It will take them years to acquire the necessary components from the West and smuggle them into Russia. Until then, we’ll probably see a lot more Russian aircraft bursting into flames.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1898: The Gaggle Talks To Prof. Jonathan Haslam

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle sat down for a long conversation about Ukraine, NATO, Trump and the prospects for peace with renowned Cambridge historian Professor Jonathan Haslam.

01:05:00
TG 1897: Trump And Putin Discuss Ukraine's Attack On Russian Strategic Bombers

George Szamuely discusses today's phone conversation between presidents Trump and Putin on the matter of Ukraine's weekend attack on Russia's strategic bombers.

00:42:03
The Gaggle Music Club: Isaac Albéniz’s "Iberia"

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Isaac Albéniz’s Iberia. Written between 1905 and 1909, during the composer's final years of life, "Iberia" is a towering masterpieces of piano composition. The work consists of 12 pieces grouped into four books. Though rooted in the musical idioms of Andalusia and indeed of Spain a whole, "Iberia" was composed while Albéniz was living in Paris and Nice.

As Albéniz’s health deteriorated during the composition of this work, he was supported and encouraged by a circle of French musicians, notably Debussy and Dukas, who admired his synthesis of Spanish folk idioms with French impressionist techniques.

Born in 1860 in Catalonia, Albéniz was a child prodigy pianist who gave his first public concert at age four. By the time he was nine, he was performing internationally. His early career was marked by spectacular virtuosity. After studying at the Leipzig and Brussels conservatories, he later moved to Paris, where he came under the ...

00:43:04
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, June 9.

The theme is "France and the spirit of 1968."

Please continue to vote after June 9, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on June 16.

JUST IN - Epstein and Trump's former lawyer Alan Dershowitz says Trump should pardon Ghislaine Maxwell: "Certainly she should get a commutation. She was in part a victim of Epstein."

https://www.disclose.tv/id/xg11cl5q6u/

@disclosetv

@TheGaggle Dear Gyorgy, you're totally wrong about the history of Cyprus demographics - the island was Ottoman only for 3 centuries, while it was part of the Greek world since antiquity. When the British took over Cyprus in 1878, the Greeks still constituted the majority of the island's population. Your claim that they started arriving in the colonial period is absolutely false. Are you trying to get invited to TRT shows again or something?

post photo preview
January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals