TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Book Club: "All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup And The Roots Of Middle East Terror" By Stephen Kinzer

Each week, the Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it. Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection, very appropriate for this moment, is Stephen Kinzer’s "All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror." Published in 2003, and revised in 2008, the book is one of the most readable accounts of the 1953 CIA–MI6 coup that overthrew Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. It’s an entertaining, vivid, journalistically written narrative with a clear political message: American intervention in Iran set the stage for decades of mistrust, repression and violence—not only in Iran, but across the Middle East.

Stephen Kinzer, a former New York Times foreign correspondent, argues that the overthrow of Mossadegh was a major U.S. strategic blunder. By siding with imperial Britain and oil companies, rather than supporting a popular, elected leader, the United States destroyed Iran’s chance at democratic development.

The centerpiece of Kinzer's book is his account of Operation Ajax, the coup organized by CIA operative Kermit Roosevelt Jr. The coup adopted tactics with which the world was to become familiar in the coming years. The CIA unleashed a mixture of propaganda, bribery and staged demonstrations to destabilize Mossadegh’s government.

Kinzer's story begins with Great Britain’s control of Iranian oil via the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (later British Petroleum). Mossadegh, an Iranian nationalist, sought to ensure that that oil revenues benefit Iranians, rather than the British. Elected prime minister in 1951, Mossadegh nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. The enraged British resolved to seek his overthrow. They sensed an opportunity. Mossadegh, while popular with ordinary Iranians, was hated by the young Shah Reza Pahlavi, conservative clerics, landowners, the merchant class (bazaaris) and the upper echelons of the military.

The Truman administration vetoed the British coup plan. Things changed however with the coming to power in 1953 of the Eisenhower administration, which was not only strongly anti-Communist but determined to fight the Cold War with greater energy than its predecessor had done. John Foster Dulles’s State Department now found persuasive British claims that Mossadegh posed a “communist threat” to the West. The U.S. was now on board with British plans.

Out of this Anlo-American collaboration came Operation Ajax. Roosevelt's plan sought to destabilize Mossadegh’s government through tactics such as bribing journalists to publish anti-Mossadegh stories, paying mobs to protest against Mossadegh, using clerics to turn religious opinion against Mossadegh and encouraging military officers to rebel against Mossadegh.

The first coup attempt against Mossadegh failed. On the night of Aug.15, 1953, Colonel Nematollah Nassiri, a Shah loyalist, tried to arrest Mossadegh using a royal firman (order) dismissing him as prime minister and appointing General Fazlollah Zahedi in his place. However, Mossadegh had been warned about this coup attempt and had Nassiri arrested. The Shah, fearing for his safety, fled to Baghdad, then to Rome.

Roosevelt however refused to give up. He intensified the anti-Mossadegh campaign. He bribed Tehran police and military officers. He paid thugs and provocateurs to stage pro-Shah and anti-Mossadegh rallies. He used street mobs to create the illusion of popular opposition. He used newspapers funded by the CIA to print rumors that Mossadegh was abolishing the monarchy, aligning with the Soviet Union and persecuting the clergy.

Some clergy and conservative politicians, already uneasy with Mossadegh’s secular nationalism, began to turn against him. On Aug. 19, early in the day, CIA-paid mobs and provocateurs began rioting in Tehran, chanting pro-Shah slogans and denouncing Mossadegh. Army units, many of whose commanders had been bribed, joined the uprising. Mobs seized key locations in Tehran, including the radio station, police headquarters and military installations. Mossadegh refused to use force, hoping to preserve constitutional norms. By the afternoon, his house was shelled by army tanks, and he fled. By nightfall, General Zahedi appeared on radio as the new prime minister. Mossadegh surrendered the next day and was tried and placed under house arrest for the rest of his life.

The Shah returned, and ruled autocratically, though incompetently, until his overthrow in 1979. Kinzer views Iran 1953 as a prototype for later CIA operations in Guatemala (1954), Chile (1973), and elsewhere. He draws a straight line from the 1953 coup to the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the rise of anti-Americanism and broader regional instability, including terrorism, that has bedeviled the Middle East for generations.

One weakness of the book is Kinzer’s tendency to romanticize Mossadegh. While Mossadegh was indeed popular and anti-imperialist, Kinzer at times presents him in hagiographic terms. Kinzer underplays Mossadegh’s flaws. He lacked political flexibility, his economic record was scarcely stellar and his political opponents were not all on the CIA payroll.

Nonetheless, Stephen Kinzer’s "All the Shah’s Men" is a powerful, accessible account of one of the most consequential covert operations in modern history.

All_the_Shah_s_Men___An_American_Coup_and_the_Roots_of_--_Stephen_Kinzer_--_John_Wiley___Sons,_Inc__(trade),_Hoboken,_N_J_,_2003_--_John_Wiley___Sons_.pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
The Gaggle Music Club: Beethoven’s Egmont Overture

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Beethoven’s Egmont Overture, Op. 84, one of the great man's most political and dramatic compositions.

Composed in 1809–1810, the overture was part of incidental music for Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s 1787 play "Egmont," which recounted the story of Count Egmont, a 16th-century Dutch nobleman who was executed by the Spanish for opposing the Inquisition and tyranny of the Duke of Alba. Goethe’s Egmont was a tragedy of political martyrdom and individual resistance against tyranny.

In 1809, Beethoven was living in Vienna, which was under siege by Napoleon’s troops. The Imperial Court Theatre in Vienna commissioned Beethoven to write music for a revival of Goethe’s play. The complete incidental music includes the Overture and nine numbers. However, it is only the Overture that has endured as a concert staple.

The Overture is in sonata form, a musical drama in miniature, encapsulating the play’s arc: oppression, resistance, ...

00:09:35
TG 1909: Trump's Unprovoked Attack On Iran: The Day After

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the aftermath and likely consequences of President Trump's unprovoked--and, as yet, unexplained--attack on Iran.

02:18:20
TG 1908: U.S. Attacks Iran

George Szamuely discusses tonight's U.S. bombing of Iran's three nuclear facilities.

00:12:03
January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals