TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Book Club: "The Stern Gang: Ideology, Politics And Terror, 1940–1949" By Joseph L. Heller

Each week, The Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is Joseph L. Heller’s "The Stern Gang: Ideology, Politics and Terror, 1940–1949." Published in 1995, the book is considered to be the definitive intellectual history of the Stern Gang in English, and is an important contribution to the deconstruction of the Zionist myth and of extreme nationalist ideology underlying it.

Lehi (originally called “Irgun Zvai Leumi in Israel”) was a radical breakaway from the Irgun, which was itself an integral part of Revisionist Zionism led by Ze’ev Jabotinsky. Heller traces how Avraham “Yair” Stern, influenced by mystical nationalism and the Maccabean myth, rejected Jabotinsky’s pragmatism and saw in the British Empire an implacable enemy of the Jews. Heller contrasts Lehi’s uncompromising anti-British stance with the attitude of mainstream Zionists such as David Ben-Gurion, who favored working with the British.

The Stern gang is of course famous for responsible for a number of shocking, violent acts perpetrated during the years of the British Mandate in Palestine.

In 1944, it assassinated Lord Moyne, British Minister Resident in the Middle East, stationed in Cairo. Moyne was seen to be a symbol of British resistance to allowing Jews into Palestine. British policy toward Jewish immigration into Palestine had changed dramatically following publication of the 1939 White Paper.

In 1948, the Stern Gang assassinated Count Folke Bernadotte, who at the time was seeking to mediate on behalf of the United Nations between the Arab and Israeli warring parties. On Sept. 17, members of the Stern Gang, posing as Israeli soldiers, stopped his U.N. convoy in Jerusalem and shot him at close range. What had Bernadotte done? He had proposed a peace plan that would return parts of the Negev to Arab control, internationalize Jerusalem and allow Palestinian refugees to return. Future Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, a Stern Gang leader, is believed to have been involved in the assassination plot, though he never faced any criminal charges for it.

Then there was the Deir Yassin Massacre. On April 9, 1948, a joint force of about 120 fighters from Irgun and Lehi (Stern Gang) attacked the Arab village of Deir Yassin, near Jerusalem. They murdered around 100 to 120 villagers, including women and children. The Jews were seeking to secure control of roads and territory before the end of the British Mandate. Deir Yassin was considered strategically significant, lying as it did on the road to besieged Jerusalem. The attack led to mass panic among Palestinian Arabs, contributing to the 1948 refugee exodus. Stern and Irgun deceptively claimed that the operation was military in nature, but later accounts—including from participants—admitted that excessive violence was perpetrated against noncombatants precisely in order to trigger Palestinian flight.

According to Heller, terrorism was central to Lehi’s ideological identity: Lehi saw terror as a legitimate, even heroic, method of liberation. Members were encouraged to see themselves as biblical Maccabees; violence was proclaimed to be a sacred struggle. Heller argues that Avraham Stern’s mystical romanticism, informed by Jewish history and the myth of Maccabean revolt, justified extreme violence. After Stern’s death at the hands of the British in 1942, Shamir became one of Lehi’s leaders. Heller emphasizes Shamir’s role in preserving ideology and directing operations.

Shamir explicitly argued that terror was morally permissible in wartime. In a 1943 article, he wrote: “Neither Jewish morality nor Jewish tradition can be used to disallow terror as a means of war… terror is for us a part of the political war appropriate for the circumstances of today.”

Heller helps us understand the differences between Irgun and the Stern Gang. Though both were Zionist paramilitary groups that operated in British Mandate Palestine during the 1930s and 1940s, they differed in origins, ideology and strategic outlook. While both engaged in violence—especially against British targets—the Stern Gang was more radical, more ideologically extreme and generally more unapologetically terroristic.

Though Jewish nationalist, Irgun nonetheless accepted the leadership of the Jewish Agency. The Stern Gang was extremely ideological, seeking total Jewish sovereignty in all of Eretz Israel, and saw the British as occupiers no different from other colonial powers—even during the fight against Nazi Germany. Avraham Stern broke away from Irgun in 1940 when Irgun agreed to suspend operations against the British during World War II. Stern viewed this as betrayal. He believed that Great Britain, more than Nazi Germany, was the primary obstacle to Jewish statehood.

Lehi went so far as to propose to Nazi Germany an alliance against the British. In late 1940 or early 1941, Lehi sent a proposal to the German authorities in Lebanon: "Proposal of the National Military Organization in Palestine (Irgun Zevai Leumi) in Palestine, concerning the solution of the Jewish question in Europe and the participation of the NMO in the war on the side of Germany." This came to be known as the Stern–Grünbaum Proposal. After the fall of France in 1940, Syria and Lebanon came under the control of Vichy France. This meant that Nazi German officials could operate undisturbed there. Beirut became a forward operating base for Nazi propaganda and espionage in the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East.

Lehi's proposal had a number of key ingredients: The Jews of Europe would be transferred to Palestine. Because the British were the main obstacle to the achievement of this objective, the Jewish movement in Palestine (Lehi) would collaborate with Nazi Germany against the British. Lehi would conduct sabotage and military operations in British-controlled Palestine. Lehi would align itself with the Axis powers in exchange for German support of Jewish immigration into Palestine and eventual statehood. The proposal explicitly referred to Nazi Germany as “the natural ally” of Lehi in their mutual struggle against Great Britain.

The Germans never took Lehi up on the offer. By late 1940 or early 1941, the Nazi regime had lost interest in the Zionists. The Madagascar Plan was long in the past. Apart from anything else, the transfer of Jews to Palestine under Nazi auspices was logistically utterly unrealistic. The British controlled Mandatory Palestine, both militarily and administratively. Any significant movement of Jewish populations into Palestine would have had to breach British naval and land control, something Germany had no means of doing. In 1941, the Royal Navy dominated the eastern Mediterranean. The Axis powers did not have access to the Levant or Palestine — indeed, Vichy Syria and Lebanon were soon invaded by British and Free French forces (June–July 1941). There was no overland or sea corridor available through which Nazi Germany could feasibly "transfer" Jews to Palestine, even if they had wanted to.

Joseph Heller’s "The Stern Gang: Ideology, Politics And Terror, 1940–1949" remains one of the most insightful scholarly accounts of the Stern Gang, the deadly influence of which continues to haunt the Middle East.

Joseph_Heller_-_The_Stern_Gang__Ideology,_Politics_and_Terror,_1940-1949-Routledge_(1995).pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
The Gaggle Music Club: Maurice Ravel’s Le Tombeau de Couperin

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Maurice Ravel’s Le Tombeau de Couperin. Composed between 1914 and 1917, the piece is one of Ravel's most poignant works. It is both a personal elegy and a musical homage. Ravel wrote it originally for the piano, but he later orchestrated four of its six movements.

Ravel began composing the piece before the First World War, but its final shape was affected by the war. The word tombeau in French Baroque music denotes a musical memorial. The piece however is not solely a tribute to François Couperin, the great French Baroque composer. It’s a broader homage to the French clavecinist tradition of the 18th century — including Jean-Henri D’Anglebert and Jean-Philippe Rameau.

More personally, each movement is dedicated to a friend of Ravel's who had died in the war. Ravel served in the war as a truck driver and lost many friends. He said of the suite: “The dead are sad enough, in their eternal silence.”

The work is neo-classical, ...

00:18:41
TG 1928: Tulsi Gabbard Discloses RussiaGate Receipts: Will It Make A Difference?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's presentation of the case that the RussiaGate hoax was from the start a treasonous plot masterminded by President Barack Obama himself. Will the disclosure however make a difference?

00:43:35
TG 1927: Is Mike Huckabee Having An Epiphany?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the surprising series of angry confrontations U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee is having with Israeli leaders, almost as if he is unaware of Israel's long record of brutal indifference toward the fate of anyone who is not a Jewish Israeli.

01:18:10
Monday Night At The Movies: "Les diaboliques" (1955)

Dear Gagglers:

Monday is, and has always been, a profoundly depressing day. That's why we have decided to add a little bit of fun to it.

On Monday, July 21, we are holding another film screening. Gagglers can watch a movie and, as they do so, offer comments, random thoughts, aesthetic observations and critical insights in the Live Chat.

We will be screening the joint-winner of The Gaggle's "films with a surprise twist" poll: Henri-Georges Clouzot's "Les diaboliques," starring Véra Clouzot and Simone Signoret.

I am delighted to announce that, after a too-long absence, The Gaggle's resident film expert, Cynthia Holt, is returning to the screenings proffer her extraordinary knowledge and insightful observations.

The film will starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.

See you at the movies.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0046911/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0_tt_8_nm_0_in_0_q_les%2520diaboliques

NEW - Japan's far-right party makes electoral gains winning 16 seats, with an anti-globalist message, highlighting the increasing foreigners in Japan, suggesting a new constitution to restore some of the emperor’s political powers and more.

In 2022, Leader Sohei Kamiya won a seat in the upper house of parliament after saying he wouldn't sell out Japan to "Jewish capital."

https://www.disclose.tv/id/mdgrf9bop1/

@disclosetv Kamiya did not Epstein himself :)))

13 hours ago

AOC’s career was launched by two Israeli venture capitalists, Joe Raby and Cheni Yerushalmi of Gage Strategies

The origin story is left out of her bio, but suggests an Obama-esque trajectory toward national power

As with Obama, the signs of sellout were always there
https://x.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1946628558908002748

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals