TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Book Club: "The Stern Gang: Ideology, Politics And Terror, 1940–1949" By Joseph L. Heller

Each week, The Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is Joseph L. Heller’s "The Stern Gang: Ideology, Politics and Terror, 1940–1949." Published in 1995, the book is considered to be the definitive intellectual history of the Stern Gang in English, and is an important contribution to the deconstruction of the Zionist myth and of extreme nationalist ideology underlying it.

Lehi (originally called “Irgun Zvai Leumi in Israel”) was a radical breakaway from the Irgun, which was itself an integral part of Revisionist Zionism led by Ze’ev Jabotinsky. Heller traces how Avraham “Yair” Stern, influenced by mystical nationalism and the Maccabean myth, rejected Jabotinsky’s pragmatism and saw in the British Empire an implacable enemy of the Jews. Heller contrasts Lehi’s uncompromising anti-British stance with the attitude of mainstream Zionists such as David Ben-Gurion, who favored working with the British.

The Stern gang is of course famous for responsible for a number of shocking, violent acts perpetrated during the years of the British Mandate in Palestine.

In 1944, it assassinated Lord Moyne, British Minister Resident in the Middle East, stationed in Cairo. Moyne was seen to be a symbol of British resistance to allowing Jews into Palestine. British policy toward Jewish immigration into Palestine had changed dramatically following publication of the 1939 White Paper.

In 1948, the Stern Gang assassinated Count Folke Bernadotte, who at the time was seeking to mediate on behalf of the United Nations between the Arab and Israeli warring parties. On Sept. 17, members of the Stern Gang, posing as Israeli soldiers, stopped his U.N. convoy in Jerusalem and shot him at close range. What had Bernadotte done? He had proposed a peace plan that would return parts of the Negev to Arab control, internationalize Jerusalem and allow Palestinian refugees to return. Future Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, a Stern Gang leader, is believed to have been involved in the assassination plot, though he never faced any criminal charges for it.

Then there was the Deir Yassin Massacre. On April 9, 1948, a joint force of about 120 fighters from Irgun and Lehi (Stern Gang) attacked the Arab village of Deir Yassin, near Jerusalem. They murdered around 100 to 120 villagers, including women and children. The Jews were seeking to secure control of roads and territory before the end of the British Mandate. Deir Yassin was considered strategically significant, lying as it did on the road to besieged Jerusalem. The attack led to mass panic among Palestinian Arabs, contributing to the 1948 refugee exodus. Stern and Irgun deceptively claimed that the operation was military in nature, but later accounts—including from participants—admitted that excessive violence was perpetrated against noncombatants precisely in order to trigger Palestinian flight.

According to Heller, terrorism was central to Lehi’s ideological identity: Lehi saw terror as a legitimate, even heroic, method of liberation. Members were encouraged to see themselves as biblical Maccabees; violence was proclaimed to be a sacred struggle. Heller argues that Avraham Stern’s mystical romanticism, informed by Jewish history and the myth of Maccabean revolt, justified extreme violence. After Stern’s death at the hands of the British in 1942, Shamir became one of Lehi’s leaders. Heller emphasizes Shamir’s role in preserving ideology and directing operations.

Shamir explicitly argued that terror was morally permissible in wartime. In a 1943 article, he wrote: “Neither Jewish morality nor Jewish tradition can be used to disallow terror as a means of war… terror is for us a part of the political war appropriate for the circumstances of today.”

Heller helps us understand the differences between Irgun and the Stern Gang. Though both were Zionist paramilitary groups that operated in British Mandate Palestine during the 1930s and 1940s, they differed in origins, ideology and strategic outlook. While both engaged in violence—especially against British targets—the Stern Gang was more radical, more ideologically extreme and generally more unapologetically terroristic.

Though Jewish nationalist, Irgun nonetheless accepted the leadership of the Jewish Agency. The Stern Gang was extremely ideological, seeking total Jewish sovereignty in all of Eretz Israel, and saw the British as occupiers no different from other colonial powers—even during the fight against Nazi Germany. Avraham Stern broke away from Irgun in 1940 when Irgun agreed to suspend operations against the British during World War II. Stern viewed this as betrayal. He believed that Great Britain, more than Nazi Germany, was the primary obstacle to Jewish statehood.

Lehi went so far as to propose to Nazi Germany an alliance against the British. In late 1940 or early 1941, Lehi sent a proposal to the German authorities in Lebanon: "Proposal of the National Military Organization in Palestine (Irgun Zevai Leumi) in Palestine, concerning the solution of the Jewish question in Europe and the participation of the NMO in the war on the side of Germany." This came to be known as the Stern–Grünbaum Proposal. After the fall of France in 1940, Syria and Lebanon came under the control of Vichy France. This meant that Nazi German officials could operate undisturbed there. Beirut became a forward operating base for Nazi propaganda and espionage in the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East.

Lehi's proposal had a number of key ingredients: The Jews of Europe would be transferred to Palestine. Because the British were the main obstacle to the achievement of this objective, the Jewish movement in Palestine (Lehi) would collaborate with Nazi Germany against the British. Lehi would conduct sabotage and military operations in British-controlled Palestine. Lehi would align itself with the Axis powers in exchange for German support of Jewish immigration into Palestine and eventual statehood. The proposal explicitly referred to Nazi Germany as “the natural ally” of Lehi in their mutual struggle against Great Britain.

The Germans never took Lehi up on the offer. By late 1940 or early 1941, the Nazi regime had lost interest in the Zionists. The Madagascar Plan was long in the past. Apart from anything else, the transfer of Jews to Palestine under Nazi auspices was logistically utterly unrealistic. The British controlled Mandatory Palestine, both militarily and administratively. Any significant movement of Jewish populations into Palestine would have had to breach British naval and land control, something Germany had no means of doing. In 1941, the Royal Navy dominated the eastern Mediterranean. The Axis powers did not have access to the Levant or Palestine — indeed, Vichy Syria and Lebanon were soon invaded by British and Free French forces (June–July 1941). There was no overland or sea corridor available through which Nazi Germany could feasibly "transfer" Jews to Palestine, even if they had wanted to.

Joseph Heller’s "The Stern Gang: Ideology, Politics And Terror, 1940–1949" remains one of the most insightful scholarly accounts of the Stern Gang, the deadly influence of which continues to haunt the Middle East.

Joseph_Heller_-_The_Stern_Gang__Ideology,_Politics_and_Terror,_1940-1949-Routledge_(1995).pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
December 01, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Alban Berg's “Lyric Suite”

This week’s selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Alban Berg's “Lyric Suite.” Composed during 1925–26, the work is a twelve-tone string quartet that secretly encodes a forbidden love affair.

Berg wrote the suite during the time he was emotionally involved with Hanna Fuchs-Robettin, the wife of a Prague businessman and sister of writer Franz Werfel. Berg was married to Helene Nahowski, a noble and socially prominent Viennese woman. The romance therefore had to be kept clandestine.

The work was for many years interpreted as a purely abstract serial composition. However, in 1976, musicologist George Perle discovered a marked-up score of the suite in Hanna’s library. The score contained personal markings in Berg’s hand, secret dedications, references to private meetings and quotations from operas with erotic or tragic meaning.

Berg’s “Lyric Suite” is thus a rigorously constructed twelve-tone composition and a coded love confession—Berg’s most intimate emotional ...

00:33:36
TG 2023: The Witkoff-Kushner Mission To Moscow: Is The End Any Closer?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the Witkoff-Kushner mission to Moscow, and wonder whether President Trump's emissaries' 5-hour meeting with President Putin has brought the war any closer to a conclusion.

00:50:21
November 30, 2025
TG 2024: Distinguished Historian Doesn't Distinguish Himself

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss an interview given to the "Telegraph" by Antony Beevor, in which the eminent military historian shows himself to be unable to rise above trite cliches when it comes to describing the war in Ukraine.

00:42:22

"WE Refused Diplomacy" - Col. Daniel Davis vs. Gen. Ben Hodges On Russia/Ukraine War...

Mario Nawfal

150K subscribers

802 views Premiered 76 minutes ago

Join this channel to get access to perks:    / @marionawfal   Is Russia winning this war or is Putin bleeding out behind the propaganda? U.S. General Ben Hodges and Colonel Daniel Davis go head-to-head on the battlefield, the politics, and the future of the entire region. Nothing was off limits. They clashed on:

Whether Russia’s goal is territory or the total destruction of Ukraine’s military

Why Pokrovsk is close to falling and what that really means for the front

If Russia has air supremacy, the manpower advantage, and the industrial base to grind Ukraine down

Why Ukrainian brigades are collapsing from manpower shortages while Russia stockpiles weapons for a much bigger fight

Whether NATO is already in a “low-level war” with Moscow

How sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil are hitting Russia’s ...

14 hours ago

People will insist that Putin's 'approach' is working in Ukraine. But, it will hardly be said to be working if we end up in a nuclear war. Yes, it will be directly the fault of the Europeans, but if your body has become gently floating radioactive ash, you will not be in a position to smugly point fingers.

Dr. Gilbert Doctorow : Are US/Russian Negotiations a Waste of Time?

22 hours ago

Yaaaaaay, AI judges
ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸
@BarronTNews_
Cont de comentarii
🚨JUST IN: Elon Musk is basically trying to flip the whole court system upside down. He’s talking about an AI judge that can look at a case and spit out a decision in seconds. No lawyers dragging things out for months. No endless filings. None of the nonsense that turns simple disputes into life-ruining bills.

And honestly, you can already see why the people who profit from the current mess are freaking out. A fast, clean system with no games? That scares the hell out of them. They’ve built careers on delays and confusion.

Musk is basically saying: “Why does justice take years when the facts are right there?”
And he’s not wrong. The only people who hate this idea are the ones who know their power depends on keeping everything slow and impossible.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals