TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Music Club: Carlos Chávez's Sinfonía India

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Carlos Chávez's Sinfonía India (Symphony No. 2).

Carlos Chávez (1899–1978), one of the leading figures of Mexican 20th-century classical music, composed Sinfonía India in 1936 while working as a guest conductor of the New York Philharmonic.

During the 1920s and 1930s, 30s, the Mexican government actively promoted a new national identity. Artists such as Diego Rivera, José Clemente Orozco and David Alfaro Siqueiros glorified indigenous heritage in murals; composers such as Chávez and Silvestre Revueltas did the same in music.

Chávez, as conductor of the Orquesta Sinfónica de México, was at the center of this cultural nationalism, believing Mexican music must not only adopt modernist European styles but reflect indigenous and folk traditions. Chávez sought to integrate indigenous music, pre-Columbian rhythms, and Mexican folk material into modern classical forms.

Chavez conceived Sinfonía India as a single-movement symphony, as a musical emblem of Mexican identity for an international audience. The symphony premiered in 1936 in New York, with Chávez himself conducting.

Chávez avoided the traditional four-movement symphonic form, writing instead a compact, single-movement work that was highly rhythmic and colorful, designed to make a strong impression in a single hearing.

He wove in authentic indigenous melodies, and added an expanded percussion section with indigenous instruments. This gave the piece an exotic, raw energy — different from European modernism but still modern. Chávez wanted the symphony to be rooted in indigenous melodies and rhythms rather than European ones. He collected the material from ethnographic sources and oral traditions, then reworked them into a modern symphonic structure.

Chávez described the work as a “symphony written with Indian themes of Mexico”; hence the title Sinfonía India. It was a musical vision of mestizo Mexico--a modern orchestra channeling the ancient indigenous voices.

At the same time, it was a statement to international audiences: Mexico is modern and cosmopolitan, but proudly rooted in its native heritage. Chávez created a Mexican counterpart to Bartók’s folk modernism. To this day, it remains the most widely played Mexican symphonic work internationally.

In this performance from 2016, Andrés Valero-Castells conducts Banda Municipal de Música de A Coruña from Spain.

00:13:51
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2088: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 16: Asymmetric War Gets Evermore Asymmetric

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Day 16 of the U.S.-Israel War On Iran, and conclude that, while the United States has gone through plans A, B and C, Iran has so far stuck to its strategy of inflicting as much pain as possible on its adversaries.

01:20:22
TG 2087: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 14: Is There Any Way To Get Out Of This Mess?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle examine how the war that the United States and Israel launched against Iran 13 days ago is going, and wonder whether there is any way it can end without escalating into a world war.

01:31:47
International Committee To Defend Slobodan Milošević

This is the news conference from Belgrade, March 10, 2026. Unfortunately, almost all of it, with the exception of George Szamuely's contribution, is in Serbian.

01:56:42
The Putin-Clinton Conversations

Vladimir Putin and Bill Clinton discussed removing Slobodan Milošević from power 20 years ago. This is a sad read. Putin did as little to help Milošević (the man who withstood 11 weeks of NATO bombing) as he did 14 years later Viktor Yanukovych.

https://amp.meduza.io/en/feature/2020/10/08/the-regime-changers

Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, March 9.

The theme is "Coups and Military Dictatorships."

Please continue to vote after March 9, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on March 16.

This is absolutely insane:

Prior to the Iran war, US oil companies were generating ~$62 billion in annual free cash flow with oil prices at $55/barrel.

Now, with oil prices at $100/barrel, US oil companies are expected to generate $163 billion in annual free cash flow, if current prices are sustained.

In other words, US oil giants are set to rake in an additional +$100 BILLION in free cash flow per year if oil prices remain elevated.

We are arguably witnessing the most profitable market conditions in history for US big oil. https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2032977830234214487?s=20

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals