TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Music Club: Carlos Chávez's Sinfonía India

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Carlos Chávez's Sinfonía India (Symphony No. 2).

Carlos Chávez (1899–1978), one of the leading figures of Mexican 20th-century classical music, composed Sinfonía India in 1936 while working as a guest conductor of the New York Philharmonic.

During the 1920s and 1930s, 30s, the Mexican government actively promoted a new national identity. Artists such as Diego Rivera, José Clemente Orozco and David Alfaro Siqueiros glorified indigenous heritage in murals; composers such as Chávez and Silvestre Revueltas did the same in music.

Chávez, as conductor of the Orquesta Sinfónica de México, was at the center of this cultural nationalism, believing Mexican music must not only adopt modernist European styles but reflect indigenous and folk traditions. Chávez sought to integrate indigenous music, pre-Columbian rhythms, and Mexican folk material into modern classical forms.

Chavez conceived Sinfonía India as a single-movement symphony, as a musical emblem of Mexican identity for an international audience. The symphony premiered in 1936 in New York, with Chávez himself conducting.

Chávez avoided the traditional four-movement symphonic form, writing instead a compact, single-movement work that was highly rhythmic and colorful, designed to make a strong impression in a single hearing.

He wove in authentic indigenous melodies, and added an expanded percussion section with indigenous instruments. This gave the piece an exotic, raw energy — different from European modernism but still modern. Chávez wanted the symphony to be rooted in indigenous melodies and rhythms rather than European ones. He collected the material from ethnographic sources and oral traditions, then reworked them into a modern symphonic structure.

Chávez described the work as a “symphony written with Indian themes of Mexico”; hence the title Sinfonía India. It was a musical vision of mestizo Mexico--a modern orchestra channeling the ancient indigenous voices.

At the same time, it was a statement to international audiences: Mexico is modern and cosmopolitan, but proudly rooted in its native heritage. Chávez created a Mexican counterpart to Bartók’s folk modernism. To this day, it remains the most widely played Mexican symphonic work internationally.

In this performance from 2016, Andrés Valero-Castells conducts Banda Municipal de Música de A Coruña from Spain.

00:13:51
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Monday Night At The Movies: "Absence of Malice" (1981)

Join Gagglers for "Absence of Malice"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

01:56:15
TG 2110: Macron Announces: U.S., Russia and China All Stand Against Europe

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Macron's latest declaration, made in Greece, that Europe is now confronting, at one and the same time, a hostile United States, China and Russia.

01:06:59
TG 2109: Yet Another Attempt on the Life of Trump

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the latest attempt on the life of President Trump.

00:22:29

We are told government exists to make possible what markets alone cannot.

The ongoing energy crisis forces the opposite conclusion.

When the Soviet Union needed industrial capacity, it turned to Albert Kahn Associates, a private firm, to design and build its factories, factories it could not build itself. When Europe needed gas, pipelines and financing emerged from commercial consortia. The global oil system pipelines, terminals, tankers, insurance, and trading is a market-built machine designed to keep energy flowing.

Markets solve the impossible problem: find supply, assemble capital, build infrastructure, deliver energy across continents.

Then government intervenes and destroys the system throughout a variety of tactics up to the physical destruction of Nordstream.

Permits halted.
Exports frozen.
Sanctions imposed.
Energy shipments through the Persian Gulf constrained not by capacity, but by state conflict.
Infrastructure like Nord Stream AG rendered inert not by engineering limits, but by ...

OSINTtechnical
@Osinttechnical
·
55 m
A Malian official says that “The Russians betrayed us” after Russia’s Africa Corps negotiated a withdrawal with rebel forces in the northern city of Kidal -RFI

Russian forces are reportedly preparing to withdraw from additional positions in northern Mali.

:)))) fell for it again award

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals