TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Yet Another NATO Punch-and-Judy Show

Every couple of years, the media treat us to the spectacle of an intramural fight within NATO. France--it's usually France--declares that it wants NATO member-states to contribute more funds to NATO (even more perhaps than the Americans are demanding). Why? Because, apparently, the Americans are losing interest in Europe and are fixated on something else. Today's it's China. A few years back it was the Middle East. Before that it was the Persian Gulf. Before that it was Central America. Before that it was Latin America. Therefore, says France--yes, it's usually France--the Europeans need to step up to the plate and impose a European dimension to NATO.

That's when it gets a little tricky. What exactly does France--yes, it's usually France--intend to do that NATO is not already doing? French leaders scratch their heads and ponder. Ah, they cry, what about Afghanistan? The Americans want to pull out and they didn't even inform us about it! OK, so the French want to stay on in Afghanistan?

OK, not a good suggestion. What about Africa? Ah, now we are on to something. That brings back memories of happier days: France's African colonies, not to mention the grandiose Francophone visions of de Gaulle, as well as the French military interventions in Africa during the 1970s under Giscard d'Estaing. And, sure enough, the French defense minister brings up intervention in the Sahel as the model for future European NATO interventions. I am sure everyone in Europe will be thrilled at the prospect, particularly as the reason for this intervention in the first place was the French-inspired NATO onslaught on Libya.

France wishes to continue to the great NATO tradition of using armed force to solve crises that it had itself created.

https://www.politico.eu/article/nato-summit-france-europe-florence-parly-defense/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1622537447

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2189: Putin Laments Lost Opportunities At Cold War's End

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Putin's speech and subsequent Q&A at this year's Valdai conference, and highlight his repeated laments that relations between the West and Russia could have gone in a very different direction had the West not chosen to exploit its temporary advantage.

01:08:52
Live Chat
September 28, 2026
Monday Night At The Movies: "La Revolution Française" (1989)

Join Gagglers for "La Revolution Française"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

02:33:59
September 27, 2026
TG 2188: Switzerland Votes On Retaining Its Neutrality

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Switzerland's referendum on retaining its neutrality, and wonder whether the NATOization of the country can be averted.

00:42:59
September 30, 2026
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Oct. 5.

The theme of the poll is films that feature superintelligence, superbrains, computers more powerful than the brain of man, machines taking control.

Please continue to vote in this poll after Oct. 5, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Oct. 12.

October 01, 2026

1. Russia Threatens NUCLEAR War If NATO Touches Kaliningrad | Dr. George Szamuely

Jamarl Thomas

78.2K subscribers

254 views Premiered 72 minutes ago

Russia Threatens NUCLEAR War If NATO Touches Kaliningrad | Dr. George Szamuely

Saudi Arabia Prepares Offensive to Retake Bab el-Mandeb From Houthis

🇸🇦Saudi Arabia is preparing an offensive against 🇾🇪Yemen's Houthis, possibly within weeks and by early November, Reuters reports.

The main goal is retaking Bab el-Mandeb, the Red Sea's southern gate, which the Houthis seized last month.

More than 100,000 Yemeni troops could be mobilized with Saudi air support.

Riyadh is weighing a limited coastal assault or a wider multi-front campaign across Yemen.

🇺🇸The US is providing intelligence and targeting data but won't fight directly.

🇵🇰Pakistan has 30,000–40,000 troops inside Saudi Arabia for air and missile defense.

🇫🇷France is sending air defenses and troops to protect Yanbu.

This is about oil before it's about Yemen.

Saudi Arabia's way around Hormuz is the East-West pipeline and it ends at Yanbu on the Red Sea.

With the Houthis holding Bab el-Mandeb, those barrels can only leave north through Suez.

Riyadh has rerouted around one chokepoint and now has to fight for the second.

...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals