TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
19 hours ago

Beijing Remains Silent on Power of Siberia 2 Agreement

Despite Moscow’s claims, Beijing has not confirmed any agreement on the long-discussed Power of Siberia 2 gas pipeline. During Vladimir Putin’s September visit to China, Gazprom CEO Alexey Miller announced that a “legally binding memorandum” had been signed, pledging to raise gas exports to China to over 100 billion cubic meters annually. This statement led to a flurry of Kremlin-echoed remarks, characterizing the Miller announcement as a breakthrough in Russo-Chinese energy cooperation.

China, however, has remained silent about the agreement to date. Xi Jinping, for example, made no public reference to the pipeline, nor has China National Petroleum Company (CNPC) issued any statement, while the Chinese state media has completely avoided making any mention of the deal. To add insult to injury, there was no photo opportunity of Putin and Xi signing the Power of Siberia 2 agreement, which would have made front-page news around the world. It seems, however, that only the Financial Times reported that the agreement was finalized although the newspaper noted that no gas pricing agreement was announced, which has been a key holdup to any go-ahead with the project. Upon closer scrutiny, some Western energy analysts are noting that Moscow’s announcements are premature (see Paul Goble’s article below exploring this announcement), noting the communique from the talks merely spoke of “cross-border infrastructure.” Experts stress that without agreed pricing or timelines, the project remains aspirational.

Russo-Chinese Trade Plummets by Nearly 20 Percent

Russian-Chinese trade is experiencing a sharp downturn in 2025, marking the first sustained decline since Russia’s war against Ukraine began three years ago. In August, Chinese imports from Russia fell 17.8% year-on-year, while its exports to Russia dropped 16.4%, nearly double July’s decline. Over the first eight months of 2025, bilateral trade fell nearly 9% to $145 billion, with Russian exports down 8.8% and Chinese exports down 8.2%. Customs data show steep reductions in Chinese purchases of Russian oil (-11%), petroleum products (-28%), LNG (-13%), coal and timber (-10%). The Chinese slowdown has alarmed the Kremlin, with insiders criticizing Beijing for exploiting Moscow rather than acting as an ally. During President Putin’s September visit to China, efforts to secure major new deals yielded little: modest increases in gas and oil contracts represent only fractions of Russian output, while the much-touted Power of Siberia 2 pipeline remains unconfirmed by China.

Chinese Companies Ignore Vladivostok Economic Summit

In the wake of President Putin’s successful trip to China and high-level meetings with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, one would have expected that China would have reciprocated the ‘partnership with no limits’ relationship by sending dozens – or at least one - ranking Chinese company to participate in Russia’s premier Far Eastern economic investment conference - the Eastern Economic Forum (EEF). While the gathering of the EEF in Vladivostok – which opened on September 3 - is widely touted by the Kremlin as an “authoritative business platform” for Asia-Pacific cooperation and a cornerstone of Moscow’s pivot-to-Asia strategy, none of China’s top political and business leaders showed up.

Not a single senior representative from China’s Ministry of Commerce, Ministry of Finance, Foreign Ministry, or Central Bank attended. In fact, the highest-ranking delegate who participated in the EEF was Li Hongzhong, Vice Chairman of China’s National People’s Congress, who was accompanied by some of his deputies and aides. By contrast, past forums have featured Chinese President Xi Jinping, Japan’s Shinzo Abe, and India’s Narendra Modi. This year, only Mongolia and Laos sent prime ministers, while India’s representation dropped to a deputy ambassador. No executives from China’s major corporations appeared on the guest list; instead, discussions were led by local officials such as the mayor of Fuyuan, a small Chinese border city. The muted turnout in Vladivostok suggests Beijing is in no rush to elevate the partnership, leaving Moscow increasingly reliant on China for its economic future. https://www.saratoga-foundation.org/p/kitaizatsiya-china-in-russia-newsletter?publication_id=3073942&post_id=173383317&isFreemail=true&r=o786d&triedRedirect=true

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1966: Poland/EU Splutter In Rage Over Supposed Russian Drone Attack On Poland

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the EU and Poland's allegation that Russia intentionally launched a drone attack on Poland and wonder what may be behind this unexpected development.

00:35:41
TG 1965: The Murder Of Charlie Kirk: Separating Fact From Fiction

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and try to disentangle fact from fiction about the political activist's life.

00:38:59
September 10, 2025
TG 1964: Did Trump Collude With Netanyahu To Sabotage Yet Another Trump Peace Plan?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Israel's attack on Hamas leaders in Doha, Qatar, even as they were meeting to discuss President Trump's latest Gaza peace plan, and try to discern how much foreknowledge the U.S. had had of the impending mass assassination.

00:37:19

Hah get a load of this, in gematria, apparently, Moshiach ben David is 424, Donald Trump is 424, in 2018, at the first sitting US president visit to the Wailing Wall, the moment he touches the wall is 4:24 PM local, from Trump's assassination 'attempt' last year to Charlie Kirk's killing is exactly 424 days :D

Piece of shit used-car snakeoil salesman Trump is torn by his grief, obviously, this killing being the pretext for the militarization of American cities, just like Alex 'Loudmouth Cheerleader for Everything Trump Does' Jones warned 18 years ago
Shannon Joy
@ShannonJoyRadio
Are we being punked?
Citat
An0maly
@LegendaryEnergy
·
16 h
A reporter asks President Trump how he’s holding up after his friend Charlie Kirk was assassinated.

Trump’s response: “I think very good. By the way, right there you see all the trucks. They just started construction of the new ballroom for the WH”

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals