TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
September 15, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Brahms’s Piano Quartet in G minor, As Orchestrated By Arnold Schoenberg

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Brahms’s Piano Quartet in G minor, Op. 25, as orchestrated by Arnold Schoenberg.

Johannes Brahms composed his Piano Quartet in G minor, Op. 25, between 1856 and 1861. It is understandable why Schoenberg was eager to orchestrate it. The quartet is a dramatic and expansive chamber work. It is made up of four movements, culminating in the famous “Rondo alla Zingarese.” Clara Schumann, Brahms’s lifelong friend and confidante, had described the piano quartet as “symphonic in breadth and power.” According to her, the quartet’s length (almost 50 minutes), the weight of its four movements and the sheer intensity of the piano part went beyond the intimate scope of chamber music.

The quartet premiered in Hamburg in 1861, with Clara herself playing the piano part in subsequent performances. Even before Schoenberg, musicians had made attempts to turn the quartet into a symphonic work. Friedrich Hermann (a Leipzig violinist and arranger) made an orchestral version of the “Rondo alla Zingarese.” It became a popular orchestral encore piece in the late 19th century.

Schoenberg admired Brahms's music, and indeed took inspiration from it. Schoenberg in particular heaped praise on what he termed Brahms’s “developing variation” technique. In his 1933 essay "Brahms the Progressive," Schoenberg identified this technique as one that allows new musical material to be continuously generated by way of variation on an initial idea, rather than by way of introduction of unrelated new themes. So instead of writing a melody, then contrasting it with something brand new, Brahms takes a small motif and spins the whole piece out of its transformation. Somewhat unexpectedly, Schoenberg considered Brahms to be a “progressive” composer, a kind of spiritual forefather of modernism.

Schoenberg orchestrated the quartet in 1937. At the time, he was living as an exile in the United States, teaching at University of California, Los Angeles, and conducting orchestras. He had limited access to string quartets or piano quartet ensembles, and wanted to find a way to present the Brahms work to orchestral audiences.

Following the premiere, some critics accused Schoenberg of “modernizing” Brahms against his will. Others argued that the orchestration was entirely in sympathy with Brahms’s spirit, revealing textures that the piano part could only suggest. Schoenberg gave Brahms a full woodwind section, brass and percussion. The orchestration is especially vivid in the last movement (Rondo alla Zingarese), which becomes a kind of orchestral showpiece with Hungarian-gypsy color, in the style of Kodály or Bartók.

Today, Brahms’s Piano Quartet in G minor, Op. 25, as orchestrated by Arnold Schoenberg, is considered one of the finest examples of “reimagining” chamber music for orchestra, alongside Mahler’s re-orchestrations of Beethoven and Schumann. It has entered the symphonic repertoire, often played by orchestras that want both Brahms’s passion and Schoenberg’s orchestral brilliance.

In this performance from 2017, the Frankfurt Radio Symphony is conducted by Christoph Eschenbach.

00:48:43
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
December 08, 2025
TG 2025: Does Trump's National Security Strategy Signal A Revolution In U.S. Foreign Policy

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle continue discussing the Trump administration's new National Security Strategy, and wonder whether the very radical-sounding document portends a revolution in U.S. foreign policy.

01:47:52
December 08, 2025
TG 2025: Does Trump's National Security Strategy Signal A Revolution In U.S. Foreign Policy

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle continue discussing the Trump administration's new National Security Strategy, and wonder whether the very radical-sounding document portends a revolution in U.S. foreign policy.

01:47:52
December 05, 2025
TG 2024: Trump's New National Security Strategy Scorns Europe

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's newly-released National Security Strategy 2025, and agree that its most startling and unprecedented aspect is its scornful dismissal of Europe as a serious geopolitical player.

01:33:21
The Gaggle Book Club: “Show Trials: Stalinist Purges in Eastern Europe, 1948–1954” by George H. Hodos

Each week, The Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is "Show Trials: Stalinist Purges in Eastern Europe, 1948–1954" by George H. Hodos. Published in 1987, the book offers a comparative political history of the Stalinist purges in seven Eastern European “people’s democracies” from 1948, the year of the Stalin-Tito split, to 1954, the year after Stalin’s death.

Hodos's overall thesis is that the show trials were instruments of political discipline imposed by Moscow on its newly created satellite-states, designed to eliminate local autonomy, destroy potentially independent elites and enforce ideological conformity through terror.

Hodos was...

Show_Trials___Stalinist_Purges_in_Eastern_Europe,_1948-1954_--_George_H_Hodos;_Joseph_Stalin_--_Bloomsbury_USA,_New_York,_1987_--_Praeger_Publishers_--_9780275927837_--_219d61266ab448d9341f1ca05084d3ac_--_Anna’s_Archive.pdf
December 08, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies: "Mephisto" (1981)

Join Gagglers for "Mephisto"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

There are still issues with Locals. So, I uploaded the film on Rumble. So, you can click on the link, and watch the movie. The chat works same as before. See you at 3 p.m. ET

placeholder
December 07, 2025
TG 2025: Does Trump's National Security Strategy Signal A Revolution In U.S. Foreign Policy

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle continue discussing the Trump administration's new National Security Strategy, and wonder whether the very radical-sounding document portends a revolution in U.S. foreign policy.

Locals is acting up again. So we are re-posting from YouTube. Sincere apologies.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals