TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
September 22, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Debussy’s La Mer

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is La Mer by Claude Debussy (The Sea: Three Symphonic Sketches for Orchestra). Completed in 1905, the work is an orchestral masterpiece, and Debussy's greatest large-scale instrumental work.

Debussy had long been fascinated by the sea and water imagery in poetry, painting and Japanese art. Debussy himself grew up in Paris, not by the sea — in fact, he admitted: “I was destined for the seashore only in my imagination.” Debussy took inspiration from the paintings of J.M.W. Turner and Claude Monet, as well as Katsushika Hokusai’s woodblock print "The Great Wave off Kanagawa" (he kept a print in his study, and it was used on the cover of the first edition of La Mer). Debussy was also an admirer of the Symbolist poetry by Stéphane Mallarmé and Charles Baudelaire, both of whom often used water as metaphor.

Debussy began composing La Mer around 1903, working on it intensively through 1904–1905. It should come as no surprise that he was nowhere near the sea during the time he worked on the piece. Most of the work was done while he was living in Bichain, Burgundy, a countryside village about as far inland as one can get in France. Some drafting was done in Dijon, which is also landlocked. That was the point of La Mer: the piece was not seeking to depict a literal seascape but an imagined, symbolic vision of the sea.

Debussy subtitled it “Three Symphonic Sketches for Orchestra”; it was not a supposed to be a symphony--it emphasized mood over classical form. He sought to create a work truer to French sensibilities: color, suggestion, fluidity. Rather than depicting crashing waves literally, he aimed at capturing the essence and emotional resonance of the sea — its vastness, changeability and mystery.

The three sketches of La Mer form a loose triptych moving from dawn and calmness, through motion and play, to a powerful climax.

Critics and audiences were initially less than enthused. They found the work confusing, formless and lacking melody. Some thought it was a collection of “effects” without substance. One critic--Pierre Lalo (1866–1943), music critic for "Le Temps" and son of Édouard Lalo--sneered that “There is no sea, and no sun in this work. There are only small mistakes in form and harmony. Debussy has forgotten that music should be clear."

As modern music developed, La Mer began to look visionary rather than incoherent. Conductors such as Pierre Monteux and Arturo Toscanini championed it, celebrating the work for its structural strength as well as its colors. By the 1920s, critics hailed the composition as Debussy’s orchestral masterpiece, on a par with the symphonies of the German tradition but utterly different in approach. La Mer, they argued, was not “formless” at all. Instead, Debussy built organic structures in which themes evolve and transform continuously, rather than follow the sonata form. Debussy was now no longer seen merely as an “Impressionist” but as a serious symphonic thinker.

Debussy's La Mer stands as one of the most influential and admired orchestral works of the 20th century, a model of how music can evoke nature without resorting to literal description. La Mer remains Debussy's peak orchestral statement, and his most enduring concert-hall work.

In this performance from 2023, Alain Altinoglu conducts the Frankfurt Radio Symphony.
,

00:27:30
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
December 01, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Alban Berg's “Lyric Suite”

This week’s selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Alban Berg's “Lyric Suite.” Composed during 1925–26, the work is a twelve-tone string quartet that secretly encodes a forbidden love affair.

Berg wrote the suite during the time he was emotionally involved with Hanna Fuchs-Robettin, the wife of a Prague businessman and sister of writer Franz Werfel. Berg was married to Helene Nahowski, a noble and socially prominent Viennese woman. The romance therefore had to be kept clandestine.

The work was for many years interpreted as a purely abstract serial composition. However, in 1976, musicologist George Perle discovered a marked-up score of the suite in Hanna’s library. The score contained personal markings in Berg’s hand, secret dedications, references to private meetings and quotations from operas with erotic or tragic meaning.

Berg’s “Lyric Suite” is thus a rigorously constructed twelve-tone composition and a coded love confession—Berg’s most intimate emotional ...

00:33:36
TG 2023: The Witkoff-Kushner Mission To Moscow: Is The End Any Closer?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the Witkoff-Kushner mission to Moscow, and wonder whether President Trump's emissaries' 5-hour meeting with President Putin has brought the war any closer to a conclusion.

00:50:21
November 30, 2025
TG 2024: Distinguished Historian Doesn't Distinguish Himself

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss an interview given to the "Telegraph" by Antony Beevor, in which the eminent military historian shows himself to be unable to rise above trite cliches when it comes to describing the war in Ukraine.

00:42:22

"WE Refused Diplomacy" - Col. Daniel Davis vs. Gen. Ben Hodges On Russia/Ukraine War...

Mario Nawfal

150K subscribers

802 views Premiered 76 minutes ago

Join this channel to get access to perks:    / @marionawfal   Is Russia winning this war or is Putin bleeding out behind the propaganda? U.S. General Ben Hodges and Colonel Daniel Davis go head-to-head on the battlefield, the politics, and the future of the entire region. Nothing was off limits. They clashed on:

Whether Russia’s goal is territory or the total destruction of Ukraine’s military

Why Pokrovsk is close to falling and what that really means for the front

If Russia has air supremacy, the manpower advantage, and the industrial base to grind Ukraine down

Why Ukrainian brigades are collapsing from manpower shortages while Russia stockpiles weapons for a much bigger fight

Whether NATO is already in a “low-level war” with Moscow

How sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil are hitting Russia’s ...

14 hours ago

People will insist that Putin's 'approach' is working in Ukraine. But, it will hardly be said to be working if we end up in a nuclear war. Yes, it will be directly the fault of the Europeans, but if your body has become gently floating radioactive ash, you will not be in a position to smugly point fingers.

Dr. Gilbert Doctorow : Are US/Russian Negotiations a Waste of Time?

22 hours ago

Yaaaaaay, AI judges
ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸
@BarronTNews_
Cont de comentarii
🚨JUST IN: Elon Musk is basically trying to flip the whole court system upside down. He’s talking about an AI judge that can look at a case and spit out a decision in seconds. No lawyers dragging things out for months. No endless filings. None of the nonsense that turns simple disputes into life-ruining bills.

And honestly, you can already see why the people who profit from the current mess are freaking out. A fast, clean system with no games? That scares the hell out of them. They’ve built careers on delays and confusion.

Musk is basically saying: “Why does justice take years when the facts are right there?”
And he’s not wrong. The only people who hate this idea are the ones who know their power depends on keeping everything slow and impossible.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals