TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
September 22, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Debussy’s La Mer

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is La Mer by Claude Debussy (The Sea: Three Symphonic Sketches for Orchestra). Completed in 1905, the work is an orchestral masterpiece, and Debussy's greatest large-scale instrumental work.

Debussy had long been fascinated by the sea and water imagery in poetry, painting and Japanese art. Debussy himself grew up in Paris, not by the sea — in fact, he admitted: “I was destined for the seashore only in my imagination.” Debussy took inspiration from the paintings of J.M.W. Turner and Claude Monet, as well as Katsushika Hokusai’s woodblock print "The Great Wave off Kanagawa" (he kept a print in his study, and it was used on the cover of the first edition of La Mer). Debussy was also an admirer of the Symbolist poetry by Stéphane Mallarmé and Charles Baudelaire, both of whom often used water as metaphor.

Debussy began composing La Mer around 1903, working on it intensively through 1904–1905. It should come as no surprise that he was nowhere near the sea during the time he worked on the piece. Most of the work was done while he was living in Bichain, Burgundy, a countryside village about as far inland as one can get in France. Some drafting was done in Dijon, which is also landlocked. That was the point of La Mer: the piece was not seeking to depict a literal seascape but an imagined, symbolic vision of the sea.

Debussy subtitled it “Three Symphonic Sketches for Orchestra”; it was not a supposed to be a symphony--it emphasized mood over classical form. He sought to create a work truer to French sensibilities: color, suggestion, fluidity. Rather than depicting crashing waves literally, he aimed at capturing the essence and emotional resonance of the sea — its vastness, changeability and mystery.

The three sketches of La Mer form a loose triptych moving from dawn and calmness, through motion and play, to a powerful climax.

Critics and audiences were initially less than enthused. They found the work confusing, formless and lacking melody. Some thought it was a collection of “effects” without substance. One critic--Pierre Lalo (1866–1943), music critic for "Le Temps" and son of Édouard Lalo--sneered that “There is no sea, and no sun in this work. There are only small mistakes in form and harmony. Debussy has forgotten that music should be clear."

As modern music developed, La Mer began to look visionary rather than incoherent. Conductors such as Pierre Monteux and Arturo Toscanini championed it, celebrating the work for its structural strength as well as its colors. By the 1920s, critics hailed the composition as Debussy’s orchestral masterpiece, on a par with the symphonies of the German tradition but utterly different in approach. La Mer, they argued, was not “formless” at all. Instead, Debussy built organic structures in which themes evolve and transform continuously, rather than follow the sonata form. Debussy was now no longer seen merely as an “Impressionist” but as a serious symphonic thinker.

Debussy's La Mer stands as one of the most influential and admired orchestral works of the 20th century, a model of how music can evoke nature without resorting to literal description. La Mer remains Debussy's peak orchestral statement, and his most enduring concert-hall work.

In this performance from 2023, Alain Altinoglu conducts the Frankfurt Radio Symphony.
,

00:27:30
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1988: Nobel Committee, Trump Join Forces To Oust Maduro

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the well-developed plans to overthrow the government of Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro--plans that include the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Maria Corina Machado--and wonder whether anything can save Venezuela from the U.S.-instigated coup.

00:54:24
TG 1987: Trump Prepares To Address Knesset, Chair Peace Conference In Egypt

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's upcoming speech in the Knesset as well as his co-chairmanship of a Middle East peace conference in Egypt, and wonder as to how well-founded the hopes for lasting peace are.

00:51:48
October 10, 2025
TG 1986: Polish PM Donald Tusk Endorses Terrorism

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk's announcement that Poland has no intention of extraditing to Germany a Ukrainian suspected of blowing up the Nord Stream gas pipelines on the ground that what the man did was wholly commendable.

00:32:31
October 11, 2025
The Gaggle Book Club: "Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover’s Secret History Of The Second World War And Its Aftermath."

Each week, The Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is "Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover’s Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath." Published posthumously in 2011, and edited by historian George H. Nash, the work encapsulates the former president's critique of U.S. foreign policy from the 1930s through the early years of the Cold War.

Often referred to as Hoover’s magnum opus, the book offers extensive historical, ideological and personal reflections. The book is informed by a distinct antipathy toward foreign interventionism and what today would be called “globalism.”

Hoover began what eventually became "Freedom ...

HOOVER_-_Freedom_Betrayed_(2011)_(1).pdf
Monday Night At The Movies: "The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie" (1972)

Dear Gagglers:

Monday is, and has always been, a profoundly depressing day. That's why we have decided to add a little bit of fun to it.

On Monday, Oct. 13, we are holding another film screening. Gagglers can watch a movie and, as they do so, offer comments, random thoughts, aesthetic observations and critical insights in the Live Chat.

We will be screening the runner-up in The Gaggle's "time, memory and discontinuity" poll: Luis Buñuel's comedic masterpiece from 1972, "The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie," starring Stephane Audran, Fernando Rey, Delphine Seyrig and Bulle Ogier.

The film will starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp. Please join us.

See you at the movies.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068361/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0_tt_8_nm_0_in_0_q_the%2520discreet

October 02, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Oct. 6.

The theme is "memory, time and discontinuity."

Please continue to vote after Oct. 6, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Oct.13.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals