TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
September 28, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Stravinsky’s Symphony in Three Movements

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Stravinsky’s Symphony in Three Movements. Completed in 1945, the symphony is one Stravinsky's most important late works. Commissioned by the New York Philharmonic Symphony Society, the symphony premiered on Jan. 24, 1946 at Carnegie Hall, conducted by Stravinsky himself.

Often called Stravinsky's “first American symphony,” the composition shows his neoclassical language at its most taut: sharp orchestration, motor-like rhythms, lean textures.

Although Stravinsky often denied overt programmatic meaning in his music, he later admitted that the Symphony in Three Movements was a “war symphony.” The first movement, for example, was inspired by newsreel footage of wartime scorched earth tactics. Its violent rhythms and jagged piano writing reflect mechanized destruction. The final movement was inspired by Allied military advances, including the crossing of the Rhine in 1945. The march rhythms and the relentless drive exude a sense of military triumph. It is a major 20th-century war symphonies, though completely different in idiom from those of Shostakovich and Vaughan Williams.

Stravinsky left Europe after the outbreak of World War II and settled in the United States, first in Cambridge, Massachusetts, then in Hollywood. He was financially insecure and eager to find work composing film music. He signed with RKO Pictures and pursued several projects, almost all of which collapsed.

Several passages of the Symphony in Three Movements grew out of abandoned film scores, including “Song of Bernadette” and “Jane Eyre,” both from 1943. Stravinsky sketched the music for “Song of Bernadette,” but the studio executives didn't like it. Stravinsky reworked some of the fragments into the Symphony. Stravinsky drafted a piano score for “Jane Eyre,” but this too was rejected. Some of that score also found its way into the Symphony.

Stravinsky’s Symphony in Three Movements is both concise and dense, and its inner construction shows how his “neoclassical” style had matured over the years.

The work begins with a jarring piano-and-orchestra gesture: stabbing chords and leaping figures. The piano is used percussively, like an extension of the percussion section. The main motif of the first movement is a jagged, syncopated theme in the strings, with irregular accents; it is reminiscent of his earlier "Rite of Spring" style, but leaner. Musically, the movement captures mechanization, relentless drive, destruction — a musical analogue to wartime footage.

The second movement has a lyrical, quasi-pastoral quality, imbued though with irony and distance. It originated from the sketches for "The Song of Bernadette." Its intent, Stravinsky later explained, was to evoke a religious vision. The theme is Introduced by flutes and muted strings. War is presented as contrast to a vision of innocence.

The third movement depicts the advance of the Allied armies across Europe. It has the character of a march — insistent, vigorous, motor-driven. The opening is bright with a syncopated theme in the strings, with the piano acting as a percussive motor. The movement builds up into huge block chords, brass fanfares and pounding percussion. The coda is triumphant, with hammering piano and brass, ending in a blaze of orchestral affirmation.

The Symphony in Three Movements revives some of the raw energy of "Rite of Spring," particularly in its pounding rhythms. But there are also echoes of Stravinsky's neoclassicism. The symphony stands as a bridge between Stravinsky's European neoclassicism and his later American serialist period. The work draws together his 1920s-40s style but intensifies it with wartime violence. After the Symphony in Three Movements, Stravinsky never again composed a large-scale tonal symphony. Instead, he embraced serialism in the 1950s and began to use the twelve-tone technique.

At its 1946 premiere, the composition was hailed as his “American symphony.” Some critics admired its clarity and wartime power; others thought it too fragmented, too cinematic. Today it is regarded as one of Stravinsky's most successful neoclassical orchestral works, alongside "Symphony of Psalms" and "Dumbarton Oaks."

The Symphony in Three Movements stands as Stravinsky’s last great tonal symphony, a wartime work of violence and fractured montage, pulling his neoclassical methods toward something harder, leaner and, yes, more American.

In this performance from 2018, Michael Tilson Thomas conducts the New World Symphony.

00:23:14
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2088: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 16: Asymmetric War Gets Evermore Asymmetric

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Day 16 of the U.S.-Israel War On Iran, and conclude that, while the United States has gone through plans A, B and C, Iran has so far stuck to its strategy of inflicting as much pain as possible on its adversaries.

01:20:22
TG 2087: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 14: Is There Any Way To Get Out Of This Mess?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle examine how the war that the United States and Israel launched against Iran 13 days ago is going, and wonder whether there is any way it can end without escalating into a world war.

01:31:47
International Committee To Defend Slobodan Milošević

This is the news conference from Belgrade, March 10, 2026. Unfortunately, almost all of it, with the exception of George Szamuely's contribution, is in Serbian.

01:56:42
The Putin-Clinton Conversations

Vladimir Putin and Bill Clinton discussed removing Slobodan Milošević from power 20 years ago. This is a sad read. Putin did as little to help Milošević (the man who withstood 11 weeks of NATO bombing) as he did 14 years later Viktor Yanukovych.

https://amp.meduza.io/en/feature/2020/10/08/the-regime-changers

Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, March 9.

The theme is "Coups and Military Dictatorships."

Please continue to vote after March 9, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on March 16.

This is absolutely insane:

Prior to the Iran war, US oil companies were generating ~$62 billion in annual free cash flow with oil prices at $55/barrel.

Now, with oil prices at $100/barrel, US oil companies are expected to generate $163 billion in annual free cash flow, if current prices are sustained.

In other words, US oil giants are set to rake in an additional +$100 BILLION in free cash flow per year if oil prices remain elevated.

We are arguably witnessing the most profitable market conditions in history for US big oil. https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2032977830234214487?s=20

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals