TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
September 28, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Stravinsky’s Symphony in Three Movements

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Stravinsky’s Symphony in Three Movements. Completed in 1945, the symphony is one Stravinsky's most important late works. Commissioned by the New York Philharmonic Symphony Society, the symphony premiered on Jan. 24, 1946 at Carnegie Hall, conducted by Stravinsky himself.

Often called Stravinsky's “first American symphony,” the composition shows his neoclassical language at its most taut: sharp orchestration, motor-like rhythms, lean textures.

Although Stravinsky often denied overt programmatic meaning in his music, he later admitted that the Symphony in Three Movements was a “war symphony.” The first movement, for example, was inspired by newsreel footage of wartime scorched earth tactics. Its violent rhythms and jagged piano writing reflect mechanized destruction. The final movement was inspired by Allied military advances, including the crossing of the Rhine in 1945. The march rhythms and the relentless drive exude a sense of military triumph. It is a major 20th-century war symphonies, though completely different in idiom from those of Shostakovich and Vaughan Williams.

Stravinsky left Europe after the outbreak of World War II and settled in the United States, first in Cambridge, Massachusetts, then in Hollywood. He was financially insecure and eager to find work composing film music. He signed with RKO Pictures and pursued several projects, almost all of which collapsed.

Several passages of the Symphony in Three Movements grew out of abandoned film scores, including “Song of Bernadette” and “Jane Eyre,” both from 1943. Stravinsky sketched the music for “Song of Bernadette,” but the studio executives didn't like it. Stravinsky reworked some of the fragments into the Symphony. Stravinsky drafted a piano score for “Jane Eyre,” but this too was rejected. Some of that score also found its way into the Symphony.

Stravinsky’s Symphony in Three Movements is both concise and dense, and its inner construction shows how his “neoclassical” style had matured over the years.

The work begins with a jarring piano-and-orchestra gesture: stabbing chords and leaping figures. The piano is used percussively, like an extension of the percussion section. The main motif of the first movement is a jagged, syncopated theme in the strings, with irregular accents; it is reminiscent of his earlier "Rite of Spring" style, but leaner. Musically, the movement captures mechanization, relentless drive, destruction — a musical analogue to wartime footage.

The second movement has a lyrical, quasi-pastoral quality, imbued though with irony and distance. It originated from the sketches for "The Song of Bernadette." Its intent, Stravinsky later explained, was to evoke a religious vision. The theme is Introduced by flutes and muted strings. War is presented as contrast to a vision of innocence.

The third movement depicts the advance of the Allied armies across Europe. It has the character of a march — insistent, vigorous, motor-driven. The opening is bright with a syncopated theme in the strings, with the piano acting as a percussive motor. The movement builds up into huge block chords, brass fanfares and pounding percussion. The coda is triumphant, with hammering piano and brass, ending in a blaze of orchestral affirmation.

The Symphony in Three Movements revives some of the raw energy of "Rite of Spring," particularly in its pounding rhythms. But there are also echoes of Stravinsky's neoclassicism. The symphony stands as a bridge between Stravinsky's European neoclassicism and his later American serialist period. The work draws together his 1920s-40s style but intensifies it with wartime violence. After the Symphony in Three Movements, Stravinsky never again composed a large-scale tonal symphony. Instead, he embraced serialism in the 1950s and began to use the twelve-tone technique.

At its 1946 premiere, the composition was hailed as his “American symphony.” Some critics admired its clarity and wartime power; others thought it too fragmented, too cinematic. Today it is regarded as one of Stravinsky's most successful neoclassical orchestral works, alongside "Symphony of Psalms" and "Dumbarton Oaks."

The Symphony in Three Movements stands as Stravinsky’s last great tonal symphony, a wartime work of violence and fractured montage, pulling his neoclassical methods toward something harder, leaner and, yes, more American.

In this performance from 2018, Michael Tilson Thomas conducts the New World Symphony.

00:23:14
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
December 01, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Alban Berg's “Lyric Suite”

This week’s selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Alban Berg's “Lyric Suite.” Composed during 1925–26, the work is a twelve-tone string quartet that secretly encodes a forbidden love affair.

Berg wrote the suite during the time he was emotionally involved with Hanna Fuchs-Robettin, the wife of a Prague businessman and sister of writer Franz Werfel. Berg was married to Helene Nahowski, a noble and socially prominent Viennese woman. The romance therefore had to be kept clandestine.

The work was for many years interpreted as a purely abstract serial composition. However, in 1976, musicologist George Perle discovered a marked-up score of the suite in Hanna’s library. The score contained personal markings in Berg’s hand, secret dedications, references to private meetings and quotations from operas with erotic or tragic meaning.

Berg’s “Lyric Suite” is thus a rigorously constructed twelve-tone composition and a coded love confession—Berg’s most intimate emotional ...

00:33:36
TG 2023: The Witkoff-Kushner Mission To Moscow: Is The End Any Closer?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the Witkoff-Kushner mission to Moscow, and wonder whether President Trump's emissaries' 5-hour meeting with President Putin has brought the war any closer to a conclusion.

00:50:21
November 30, 2025
TG 2024: Distinguished Historian Doesn't Distinguish Himself

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss an interview given to the "Telegraph" by Antony Beevor, in which the eminent military historian shows himself to be unable to rise above trite cliches when it comes to describing the war in Ukraine.

00:42:22

"WE Refused Diplomacy" - Col. Daniel Davis vs. Gen. Ben Hodges On Russia/Ukraine War...

Mario Nawfal

150K subscribers

802 views Premiered 76 minutes ago

Join this channel to get access to perks:    / @marionawfal   Is Russia winning this war or is Putin bleeding out behind the propaganda? U.S. General Ben Hodges and Colonel Daniel Davis go head-to-head on the battlefield, the politics, and the future of the entire region. Nothing was off limits. They clashed on:

Whether Russia’s goal is territory or the total destruction of Ukraine’s military

Why Pokrovsk is close to falling and what that really means for the front

If Russia has air supremacy, the manpower advantage, and the industrial base to grind Ukraine down

Why Ukrainian brigades are collapsing from manpower shortages while Russia stockpiles weapons for a much bigger fight

Whether NATO is already in a “low-level war” with Moscow

How sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil are hitting Russia’s ...

14 hours ago

People will insist that Putin's 'approach' is working in Ukraine. But, it will hardly be said to be working if we end up in a nuclear war. Yes, it will be directly the fault of the Europeans, but if your body has become gently floating radioactive ash, you will not be in a position to smugly point fingers.

Dr. Gilbert Doctorow : Are US/Russian Negotiations a Waste of Time?

22 hours ago

Yaaaaaay, AI judges
ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸
@BarronTNews_
Cont de comentarii
🚨JUST IN: Elon Musk is basically trying to flip the whole court system upside down. He’s talking about an AI judge that can look at a case and spit out a decision in seconds. No lawyers dragging things out for months. No endless filings. None of the nonsense that turns simple disputes into life-ruining bills.

And honestly, you can already see why the people who profit from the current mess are freaking out. A fast, clean system with no games? That scares the hell out of them. They’ve built careers on delays and confusion.

Musk is basically saying: “Why does justice take years when the facts are right there?”
And he’s not wrong. The only people who hate this idea are the ones who know their power depends on keeping everything slow and impossible.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals