TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
October 11, 2025
The Gaggle Book Club: "Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover’s Secret History Of The Second World War And Its Aftermath."

Each week, The Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is "Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover’s Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath." Published posthumously in 2011, and edited by historian George H. Nash, the work encapsulates the former president's critique of U.S. foreign policy from the 1930s through the early years of the Cold War.

Often referred to as Hoover’s magnum opus, the book offers extensive historical, ideological and personal reflections. The book is informed by a distinct antipathy toward foreign interventionism and what today would be called “globalism.”

Hoover began what eventually became "Freedom Betrayed" immediately after World War II. Then in his 70s and living in semi-retirement, the former president began work on the project motivated by feelings of anger and disillusionment over how the United States had entered World War II, and how it had handled the postwar settlement. Hoover worked on the book intermittently from 1944 until his death. He dictated, wrote and rewrote hundreds of thousands of words. He was fastidious, sometimes pedantic, revising chapters over and over.

The manuscript remained unpublished during Hoover’s lifetime, probably because the 31st president was wary of challenging the prevailing Cold War consensus, not to mention the accepted interpretation of World War II as the unimpeachable exemplar of the “Good War.” Hoover died in 1964, yet the book did not see the light of day for nearly 50 years.

Hoover's work carefully examines U.S. foreign policy decisions, starting with the pre-war period and extending through to the Korean War. Throughout, Hoover is critical of contemporaries such Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry Truman and Winston Churchill. He contrasts his own vision of America as a beacon of freedom and neutrality with the imperial overreach, global ambition and moral compromise of his successors.

Hoover argues that U.S. involvement in World War II was avoidable and counterproductive. According to him, the U.S. should have focused on strengthening its own defenses and avoiding entanglements in European power struggles. He is scathing about FDR’s pre-World War II diplomacy, which, he argues, unnecessarily antagonized Germany and Japan, thereby making war with those powers inevitable. This was of course FDR’s intent, though in public he insisted that he would keep the U.S. out of war. Hoover portrays FDR as deceitful, flagrantly lying to the American people in order to win the 1940 presidential election.

Hoover believed that Hitler’s aggression, though criminal, did not threaten the Western Hemisphere. Britain and France, he argued, could have contained Germany through their own diplomacy and power if they had acted prudently. FDR’s interventionism made the U.S. complicit in a war that affected European, not American, vital interests. FDR’s intervention, as Hoover saw it, was a tragic repetition of Woodrow Wilson’s intervention in 1917.

Anti-interventionist Hoover was of course also profoundly hostile to the USSR. In this book, he is harshly critical of the wartime conferences among the Allied powers. Hoover accused Churchill and FDR of capitulating to Soviet leader Joseph Stalin and allowing Soviet dominance over Eastern Europe.

Hoover claims that Roosevelt’s decision to ally with Stalin was the greatest blunder in modern history. He believed that Hitler’s regime, though evil, would eventually have collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions, whereas Communism, once empowered, would expand indefinitely. The U.S. and Britain, he argues, saved Stalin’s regime by providing aid that allowed the USSR to survive and then conquer Eastern Europe.

Thus, World War II, in Hoover's view, did not liberate the world: it merely exchanged one tyranny (Nazism) for another (Communism). For Hoover, the moral disaster of the 20th century was that the democracies chose the wrong evil and created a worse geopolitical order than the one that had prevailed before 1939. Had the U.S. remained neutral, Hitler and Stalin would have destroyed each other, leaving a weakened Europe that would eventually have returned to some form of stability.

The postwar interventionism of Truman continued this pattern of moral confusion and strategic folly. Hoover saw the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan and NATO as dangerous overextensions that militarized U.S. policy and entangled America in perpetual conflict abroad.

According to Hoover, the United States was founded on liberty, neutrality and national sovereignty; interventionism abroad corrupts these ideals. The “freedom betrayed,” to which the book’s title refers, is a betrayal that was not merely strategic, but spiritual: the abandonment of the American tradition of peace and cooperation for a politics of coercion, deception and empire.

Hoover lamented that the U.S. had become the very thing it once opposed, namely, a meddling world power. In seeking to “save democracy,” it had helped enslave hundreds of millions. Thus, “freedom betrayed” is both a title and a judgment: the freedom of nations, and the moral freedom of the United States itself, had been sacrificed.

"Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover’s Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath" is a monumental work of revisionist history--a work of scholarship and a fierce polemic. Whatever one might think of Hoover’s counterfactuals, there is no doubting his moral seriousness and his passionate longing for the return of an America that has now sadly gone.

HOOVER_-_Freedom_Betrayed_(2011)_(1).pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
October 31, 2025
TG 2000: Trump: Toppling Maduro And Betraying Your MAGA Base

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's clearly-stated intent to overthrow violently President Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela, while betraying his MAGA supporters and going back on all of his pre-election promises.

01:07:54
October 31, 2025
TG 1999: Trump Plans To Resume Nuclear Testing; E.U. Plans To Go To War

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the strange incongruity between the nonchalance with which the NATO powers prepare to go to war against Russia and the emotional vituperations that greeted President Trump's announcement that the U.S. intends to resume nuclear testing.

00:57:14
October 29, 2025
TG 1998: E.U. Threatens Member States: Agree To Steal Russia's Assets Or Else!

George Szamuely discusses the European Commission's resort to dark threats in the face recalcitrant E.U. member-states's refusal to agree to the theft of Russia's sovereign assets.

00:36:18
October 30, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Nov. 3.

The theme is "films that have audiences rooting for the villain."

Please continue to vote after Nov. 3, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Nov. 10.

October 31, 2025
Russia Votes To Renew Mandate Of E.U. Force In Bosnia

After all the big talk about the sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina and about the need to end the reign of the illegal and illegitimate Office of the High Representative and about the unjust persecution of the republic's Serbs and about the brutally undemocratic act of kicking the elected president of Republika Srpska, Milorad Dodik, out of office by an unelected bureaucrat, after all of that, Russia dutifully lined up at the U.N. Security Council with all of the powers supposedly waging war against it, to renew the mandate of the E.U.-led stabilization force for one more year.

One need hardly add that, since this is a force led by the E.U., not only does Russia play no role whatsoever in it but the force itself is deeply antagonistic to Russia's great friend and ally: the Serbs.

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/un-security-council-renews-eu-led-stabilization-force-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina/3732080

October 31, 2025

So it begins?
🇷🇴⚖️💉 #BREAKING | The High Court of Cassation & Justice (ICCJ), in a groundbreaking ruling, has ruled that the Romanian state is liable to pay damages to people who suffered from side effects as a result of being injected with the COVID-19 vaccine!

The summary of the decision can be read by clicking the link below:

🔗 https://www.scj.ro/1093/Detalii-jurisprudenta?customQuery%5B0%5D.Key=id&customQuery%5B0%5D.Value=230235#highlight=##

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals