TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
November 02, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club: Mozart’s Symphony No. 41 In C Major

This week’s selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Mozart’s Symphony No. 41 in C major, K. 551 (“Jupiter”).

Mozart composed this symphony--without doubt one of Western music's greatest musical achievements--in the summer of 1788. It represents not only the culmination of his symphonic output; it is also a distillation of his intellectual and emotional state during one of the most difficult periods of his life.

From June to August 1788, Mozart composed three symphonies in astonishing succession: No. 39 in E-flat major, K. 543 (completed June 26); No. 40 in G minor, K. 550 (completed July 25); and No. 41 in C major, K. 551 (completed Aug. 10).

He wrote them during one of the darkest times of his life--professionally, financially and psychologically. The Viennese public had lost much of its appetite for large orchestral concerts, and Mozart’s popularity was waning. Concertgoers had become enamored of lightweight composers such as Carl Ditters von Dittersdorf and Leopold Koželuch. In addition, The Austro-Turkish War (1788–1791), conducted by Emperor Joseph II, had drained the economy and diverted aristocratic attention away from the arts.

Mozart’s finances were dire: He had moved from central Vienna to the cheaper suburb of Alsergrund and was writing desperate letters begging his fellow Freemason and friend Michael Puchberg for loans. Also, his infant daughter Theresia died in June, while his wife, Constanze, was suffered from ill-health. Mozart was frequently alone and despondent. His letters to Puchberg from July 1788 are painful reading: “If you only knew how I am forced to live — without money, without credit, without the slightest enjoyment of life… my mind and my heart are so disquieted that I can scarcely compose.”

It is all the more extraordinary therefore that out of so much sadness and despair should have emerged a work of such outstanding cosmic joy.

Scholars have long debated why Mozart wrote those three final symphonies at all. There is no surviving commission or record of a specific performance. The three symphonies form a triptych, often seen as a single grand statement — moving from E-flat (serenity and nobility) to G minor (tragedy and turbulence) to C major (radiant affirmation).

The nickname “Jupiter” was not Mozart’s — it appeared decades later, and was probably first used by the London impresario Johann Peter Salomon (who had managed Haydn’s visits to England) around 1820. The name stuck because it perfectly captured the symphony’s heroic, Olympian grandeur — the blaze of C major trumpets, the complex polyphony and the monumental final movement.

In Roman mythology, Jupiter is the king of the gods, ruler of light and order. The symphony’s final C-major blaze is often interpreted as a musical image of divine clarity, a vision of reason triumphant over chaos.

During his later years, Mozart had become increasingly fascinated by Baroque contrapuntal studies, particularly those of of J.S. Bach and George Frideric Handel, whose music he discovered through the patron Baron van Swieten. The Jupiter Symphony is the crowning result of that study. It fuses Baroque polyphony with classical form and clarity. The final movement, a magnificent five-voice fugato built from four interrelated themes, achieves something unprecedented in symphonic writing up to that time. This synthesis embodied the Enlightenment ideal of reason united with beauty, and it would profoundly influence Beethoven and the entire 19th-century symphonic tradition.

It is not known whether Mozart ever heard the Jupiter Symphony performed in his lifetime. It may have been played in a private setting, or he may have written it simply for posterity. The first documented public performance was in Vienna in 1791, the year of his death, or perhaps shortly thereafter. By the 19th century, it had become the emblem of Classical perfection — praised by Haydn and admired by Beethoven.

The finale of the Jupiter Symphony (Molto allegro, C major) is one of the most dazzling achievements in all Western music. What Mozart does here is not just craft a brilliant ending — he unites reason, beauty and sheer joy in a single act of contrapuntal perfection. Mozart fuses fugal counterpoint (inherited from Bach and Handel) with classical sonata architecture (developed by Haydn). In the movement, Mozart introduces five distinct motifs and then, in the coda, combines all of them in a contrapuntal tour de force.

The final bars are a vision of the universe functioning as one — multiplicity resolved in harmony.

In this performance from 2012, the Orquesta Sinfónica de Galicia is conducted by Lorin Maazel.

00:41:15
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
The Gaggle Music Club: Saint-Saëns’s Piano Concerto No. 2

This week’s selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Saint-Saëns’s Piano Concerto No. 2 in G minor, Op. 22.

Composed in 1868, while Camille Saint-Saëns was living in Paris, the concerto was a rushed job. Legendary Russian pianist-conductor Anton Rubinstein was visiting Paris, and he wanted to conduct a brand-new piano concerto, one composed by Saint-Saëns, with the Frenchman as soloist.

Saint-Saëns, then 32, had already composed two piano concertos and his international reputation was growing as a composer and as a virtuoso pianist.

Rubinstein announced that he would conduct a concert in Paris in mid-May and expected Saint-Saëns to have a new concerto ready by that date. Faced with this deadline, Saint-Saëns wrote a concerto one at incredible speed--essentially in 17 days.

The concerto did indeed premiere on May 13 at Salle Pleyel in Paris, with Saint-Saëns as soloist and Rubinstein as conductor. Given the constraints of time, there were barely any rehearsals. Though critics found ...

00:24:40
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Elmer Gantry" (1960)

Join Gagglers for "Elmer Gantry"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

02:26:54
November 23, 2025
TG 2018: Europeans Launch Attack On Trump's 28-Point Ukraine Plan

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss this weekend's concerted onslaught by NATO's European contingent on President Trump's 28-point peace plan for Ukraine, and wonder whether the attack will succeed.

01:23:05
November 11, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Nov. 17.

The theme is "fakes, fraudsters and conmen."

Please continue to vote after Nov. 17, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Nov. 24.

ahahaha this is so predictable
Dagny Taggart
@DagnyTaggart963
The US has rewritten the peace agreement draft

The White House stated that the current version "reflects the interests of Ukraine" and is aimed at ensuring a "sustainable and just peace."

“Any future agreement must fully respect Ukraine's sovereignty,"
— emphasized the Trump administration.

The parties agreed to continue refining the draft in the coming days.

This “peace plan” will be dead on arrival.

18 hours ago
January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals