TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Question for The Gagglers

Can anyone make head or tail of this? I am unable to do so.

The author seems to be suggesting that Biden's Democrats have embraced "foreign policy realism" (whatever that means) or even a "nationalist-populist" foreign policy. What's the evidence for this? The Biden team strikes me as simply floundering about, reaching for one thing one day and then for another the next. It wants to return to the JCPOA one day; it wants to keep sanctions on Iran in place the next. It wants to sanction Putin one day; it wants a summit the next. It wants to improve relations with China one day; it wants to encircle China the next.

I can't see much direction. "We don't want to be like Trump" one minute; "We want to be like Trump" the next. "Foreign policy for the middle class" is a sound-bite, not a foreign policy. Yet this article seems to take such nonsense seriously

Any thoughts?

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2021/06/07/ugly-when-status-quo-apologists-lash-out-at-conservative-restrainers/

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2124: Was Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Supposed To Be Iran's Delcy Rodriguez?

George Szamuely discusses the latest claims that Iran's former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was supposedly designated to be Iran's Delcy Rodriguez.

00:17:33
TG 2123: Thomas Massie Defeated--Israel Lobby Gets Another Scalp

George Szamuely discusses the successful targeting of Congressman Thomas Massie.

00:20:05
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "White Mischief" (1987)

Join Gagglers for "White Mischief"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

01:46:46

Reported in Russian media: China Asks Russia to Reduce Gas Price by 5 Times to Approve the "Power of Siberia – 2" Project

Vladimir Putin embarked on his 25th visit to China to once again persuade Xi Jinping to agree to the construction of the "Power of Siberia – 2" gas pipeline . Since the main stumbling block remains the issue of supply costs, "Gazprom" made a very advantageous offer on the gas price, a source close to the monopoly told Bloomberg. However, the Chinese side did not demonstrate readiness to advance the project.

According to him, Beijing still wants to buy gas at a price comparable to the level on the domestic Russian market. It is heavily subsidized and amounts to about $50 per thousand cubic meters. This is about 12 times lower than current European quotations and 5 times lower than the price China is currently paying — $258. https://x.com/Beefeater_Fella/status/2057016829034262676?s=20 :))))) unlimited partnership

18 hours ago

Do not whistle in the synagogue, lest you end up like Massie ;)

Miriam Adelson Wrote a $1.3 Million Check the Day After Massie Raised $1.3 Million From Thousands of Small Donors
One Israeli national offset thousands of American voices with a single check. Trump asked Adelson on camera how she buys influence. She said: 'Can you allow me not to answer?'

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals