TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Book Club: “Show Trials: Stalinist Purges in Eastern Europe, 1948–1954” by George H. Hodos

Each week, The Gaggle Book Club recommends a book for Gagglers to read and—most important—uploads a pdf version of it.

Our practice is that we do not vouch for the reliability or accuracy of any book we recommend. Still less, do we necessarily agree with a recommended book's central arguments. However, any book we recommend will be of undoubted interest and intellectual importance.

Today's book club selection is "Show Trials: Stalinist Purges in Eastern Europe, 1948–1954" by George H. Hodos. Published in 1987, the book offers a comparative political history of the Stalinist purges in seven Eastern European “people’s democracies” from 1948, the year of the Stalin-Tito split, to 1954, the year after Stalin’s death.

Hodos's overall thesis is that the show trials were instruments of political discipline imposed by Moscow on its newly created satellite-states, designed to eliminate local autonomy, destroy potentially independent elites and enforce ideological conformity through terror.

Hodos was personally caught up in the post-1948 political repression. Born in 1921 in Hungary, he emigrated in 1939 to Switzerland, studied at the University of Zurich and joined the Communist Party. After World War II, he returned to Hungary, where he worked as an editor of economic journals and as a correspondent for Western newspapers. In 1949, Hodos was arrested and convicted as an alleged “American spy.” Like many others, he was rehabilitated in the aftermath of Stalin’s death, and he remained in Hungary until the 1956 uprising. Following its suppression, he emigrated — first to Austria, then to the United States.

The book is organized into chapters, each devoted to a different country. The most detailed chapter, understandably, covers Hungary and the trial of prominent Communist László Rajk. Hodos details the political rivalry between László Rajk and Communist Party chief Mátyás Rákosi. He also discusses the infiltration of the Hungarian secret police by Soviet advisers, Rajk’s forced confession, the dramatic public trial and the subsequent mass arrests of alleged conspirators.

Other chapters cover Bulgaria and the trial of Traicho Kostov, and Czecholslovakia and the trial of Rudolf Slansky.

It is to Hodos's credit that he doesn't offer a simple-minded tale of good and evil, of bad Communists and good Westerners. As he points out, the Stalinist purges in Eastern Europe were not primarily about punishing ideological deviation per se. Nor were they simply expressions of “Moscow’s paranoia” in the abstract. The purges must be understood in the context of growing international tension and the very real threat of war between the Communist world and the U.S.-led West.

The Soviet fear of war with the West was very real, and the Soviet sense of vulnerability should not be underestimated. The Soviet attempt at creating a series of buffer states in Eastern Europe in anticipation of another possible 1941-style attack was floundering.

The Soviet-imposed Communist governments lacked popular support and appeared destined to collapse. To a Soviet Union that had barely started to recover from a devastating war, the loss of potential geopolitical allies to its Anglo-American ideological adversaries would pose a serious threat to its security, not to mention its ideological cohesion.

The show trials were attempts to pre-empt possible betrayal under extreme geopolitical pressure, not merely theatrical exercises in terror. Hodos emphasizes that in 1945–48, the countries of Eastern Europe were not fully controlled by the local Communist parties. Rather, they were unstable, politically volatile, rife with armed underground groups, penetrated by Western intelligence, culturally Western-leaning and under the sway of elites who were not Communists.

Hodos argues that the Kremlin believed that the Western was preparing for war against the Soviet Union. As the Kremlin saw it, the CIA was infiltrating émigré groups, Catholic clergy and Social Democratic parties and was developing ties with local Communists, particularly with those who had spent time abroad.

As Hodos points out, the Kremlin’s suspicions were not wholly baseless. U.S. and British intelligence were running operations out of Austria, Germany and Italy. The British were running an insurgency operation in Albania. The Vatican was running anti-Communist networks in Poland, Hungary and Croatia.

Hodos does not claim that the defendants in the trials were actual CIA agents. But he stresses that the fear of CIA penetration was real, pervasive and intensifying in Moscow and the satellite capitals.

The Stalinist show trials in Eastern Europe were pre-emptive purges designed to eliminate figures who might defect, collaborate with the West or act as conduits for Western intelligence in the event of war. Stalin needed reliable cadres in Eastern Europe, cadres who could be relied upon to remain loyal to Moscow. Communists who had lived abroad and had developed extensive connections with Western intelligence services during World War II appeared unreliable.

The purges thus were not the product of random paranoia on the part of an aging dictator in Moscow, but a systematic attempt to remove Communists who might defect to the West under pressure.

George H. Hodos’s “Show Trials: Stalinist Purges in Eastern Europe, 1948–1954” is a book worth reading because the author gets away from familiar cliches and attempts to understand a painful period of Eastern and Central European history in the context of its time.

Show_Trials___Stalinist_Purges_in_Eastern_Europe,_1948-1954_--_George_H_Hodos;_Joseph_Stalin_--_Bloomsbury_USA,_New_York,_1987_--_Praeger_Publishers_--_9780275927837_--_219d61266ab448d9341f1ca05084d3ac_--_Anna’s_Archive.pdf
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2025: Does Trump's National Security Strategy Signal A Revolution In U.S. Foreign Policy

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle continue discussing the Trump administration's new National Security Strategy, and wonder whether the very radical-sounding document portends a revolution in U.S. foreign policy.

01:47:52
TG 2025: Does Trump's National Security Strategy Signal A Revolution In U.S. Foreign Policy

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle continue discussing the Trump administration's new National Security Strategy, and wonder whether the very radical-sounding document portends a revolution in U.S. foreign policy.

01:47:52
December 05, 2025
TG 2024: Trump's New National Security Strategy Scorns Europe

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's newly-released National Security Strategy 2025, and agree that its most startling and unprecedented aspect is its scornful dismissal of Europe as a serious geopolitical player.

01:33:21
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Mephisto" (1981)

Join Gagglers for "Mephisto"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

There are still issues with Locals. So, I uploaded the film on Rumble. So, you can click on the link, and watch the movie. The chat works same as before. See you at 3 p.m. ET

placeholder

Yeah, 'cause 'the most powerful man in the world' has nothing better to do than watch TV and bitch about it online :))) what a fucking lowlife loser

Trisha Hope - National Delegate-TX
@JustTheTweets17
·
18 h
I think he's lost his mind, he is sitting here whining about Leslie Stahl when his own DOJ hasn't done a thing about the evidence found on Hunter's laptop or the stolen election.

He just sits on his ass and writes Truth Social posts no one reads until they are posted here.

What a loser he has turned out to be.
Citat
An0maly
@LegendaryEnergy
·
19 h
Trump is crying about Marjorie Taylor Greene’s 60 Minutes interview and puts pressure on the new owners of CBS to rig the network in his favor more.

December 07, 2025
TG 2025: Does Trump's National Security Strategy Signal A Revolution In U.S. Foreign Policy

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle continue discussing the Trump administration's new National Security Strategy, and wonder whether the very radical-sounding document portends a revolution in U.S. foreign policy.

Locals is acting up again. So we are re-posting from YouTube. Sincere apologies.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals