TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
January 06, 2026
The Gaggle Music Club: Leonard Bernstein’s Serenade After Plato’s “Symposium”

This week’s selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Leonard Bernstein’s Serenade after Plato’s “Symposium.”

Composed in 1954, the Serenade emerged as a result of a combination of factors: Bernstein’s love of classical culture, his effort to embed himself within European civilization, the emotional issues he was personally living with and his wish to write music that reflects serious philosophical ideas that was neither dry nor technical.

By the early 1950s, Bernstein had acquired fame in the United States, having achieved meteoric success following his stepping in for Bruno Walter as conductor of the New York Philharmonic at Carnegie Hall in 1943. He had also written popular works (On the Town, Fancy Free, Wonderful Town).

Bernstein now decided that he wanted to compose a large, intellectually grounded instrumental work that could stand alongside the great European modernist masterpieces and one that would not abandon tonal expressiveness.

Bernstein chose Plato’s Symposium as his inspiration because he was drawn to the notion of love progressing from physical desire toward intellectual and spiritual transcendence. He also saw musical opportunities in the work’s multi-voiced structure—a sequence of speakers, not a single narrative.

The Serenade was commissioned by the Koussevitzky Music Foundation, in memory of Serge Koussevitzky’s wife Natalie. Bernstein’s Serenade premiered in Venice in September 1954, with Isaac Stern as soloist and Bernstein himself conducting the Orchestra del Teatro La Fenice.

The choice of solo violin and string orchestra was significant. The violin serves as a single voice moving through a collective discourse--a Socrates moving among and drawing out the banquet guests. Its lyrical, speech-like quality allows it to function almost as a philosophical narrator.

Bernstein’s most original conceptual move was to craft Plato’s speakers onto movements with each one expressing a psychological archetype.

The work’s origin is thus inseparable from Bernstein’s belief that music could serve as a medium for philosophical argumentation without text, relying on gesture, rhythm and tonal tension.

In the piece, the solo violin acts like a speaker or narrator, sometimes leading, sometimes commenting. The orchestra represents the group or the conversation, sometimes supportive, sometimes challenging.

Each movement has a clear emotional identity, representing a distinct point of view, reflecting different aspects of love and thought. Bernstein mixes classical lyricism with jazz-like rhythms and dance energy. The piece comes across as a conversation in music rather than as a story with a plot. You hear ideas and emotions as characters in dialogue.

Leonard Bernstein’s Serenade after Plato’s “Symposium” is like listening to a dinner party with five people, each sharing his view of love.

In this performance from 2023, violin soloist Midori performs with the WDR Symphony Orchestra, conducted by Constantinos Carydis.

00:34:05
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2088: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 16: Asymmetric War Gets Evermore Asymmetric

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Day 16 of the U.S.-Israel War On Iran, and conclude that, while the United States has gone through plans A, B and C, Iran has so far stuck to its strategy of inflicting as much pain as possible on its adversaries.

01:20:22
TG 2087: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 14: Is There Any Way To Get Out Of This Mess?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle examine how the war that the United States and Israel launched against Iran 13 days ago is going, and wonder whether there is any way it can end without escalating into a world war.

01:31:47
International Committee To Defend Slobodan Milošević

This is the news conference from Belgrade, March 10, 2026. Unfortunately, almost all of it, with the exception of George Szamuely's contribution, is in Serbian.

01:56:42
The Putin-Clinton Conversations

Vladimir Putin and Bill Clinton discussed removing Slobodan Milošević from power 20 years ago. This is a sad read. Putin did as little to help Milošević (the man who withstood 11 weeks of NATO bombing) as he did 14 years later Viktor Yanukovych.

https://amp.meduza.io/en/feature/2020/10/08/the-regime-changers

Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, March 9.

The theme is "Coups and Military Dictatorships."

Please continue to vote after March 9, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on March 16.

This is absolutely insane:

Prior to the Iran war, US oil companies were generating ~$62 billion in annual free cash flow with oil prices at $55/barrel.

Now, with oil prices at $100/barrel, US oil companies are expected to generate $163 billion in annual free cash flow, if current prices are sustained.

In other words, US oil giants are set to rake in an additional +$100 BILLION in free cash flow per year if oil prices remain elevated.

We are arguably witnessing the most profitable market conditions in history for US big oil. https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2032977830234214487?s=20

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals