TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Biden Reveals Vacuousness of US Foreign Policy "Thinking"

We at The Gaggle have long suspected that the US foreign policymaking elite is in the grip of some warmed-over Nixon-Kissinger thinking. During the 1970s, Nixon brought the USSR's erstwhile ally, China, over to the US side. So, now the U.S. will flip that script and bring Russia over to the U.S. side. Back then, the USSR was the more formidable adversary against whom the U.S. had to mobilize its alliances. So, today, China is supposedly the more formidable against whom the U.S. needs to mobilize its alliances.

This thinking is amazingly delusional. Unlike in the 1960s, there is no conflict between Russia and China. The notion that Russia and China hate each other and that, at the drop of a hat, are ready to go for one another's throats is total fantasy. Russia and China are as close as any two Great Powers could be. There is no daylight between them. On the other hand, each fears and resents the West, particularly the United States.

Russia also has the experience of the last 30 years to guide it. Russia has seen NATO creep up to its borders. Russia has seen its constant demonization among Western politicians and media. Russia has seen the U.S. walk away from any agreements the moment they were in the slightest way inconvenient. The idea that Russia will abandon China and all the commercial, military and strategic advantages that come from the two countries' close relationship is delusion and fantasy. Yet, it is clear that the U.S. is incapable of getting outside of its warm, self-comforting bubble.

Russia "is being squeezed by China"? When did that happen?

Apparently, Russia is so desperate for the status that a few friendly words from Washington would supposedly bestow that it is ready to make a gigantic strategic shift, to undertake a massive change in its foreign policy--and all at no cost whatsoever to the United States. Ain't life grand!

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/06/16/remarks-by-president-biden-before-air-force-one-departure-4/

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Live Chat
December 29, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies: "The Sorrow And The Pity" Part II (1969)

Join Gagglers for "The Sorrow and the Pity" Part II!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

02:13:06
December 28, 2025
TG 2037: Zelensky Comes To Mar-A-Lago Trying To Entice Trump Into War

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Ukraine President Zelensky's visit to President Trump at Mar-A-Lago, where he will tout his 20-point peace plan in order to ensnare the American president in a protracted war against Russia.

00:56:24
December 28, 2025
TG 2038: The Bush-Putin Conversations II

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle return to the subject of the conversations that took place from 2001 to 2008 between presidents George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin, during which the subject of the threat to Russia posed by an enlarged NATO repeatedly came up.

00:32:21
January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals