TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
February 23, 2026
The Gaggle Music Club: Arnold Schoenberg’s Pelleas und Melisande

This week’s selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Arnold Schoenberg’s Pelleas und Melisande, Op. 5. Composed in 1902-03, the work stands at the crossroads between late Romanticism and 20th century Modernism.

The composition is based on the Symbolist drama Pelléas et Mélisande (1892) by Belgian playwright Maurice Maeterlinck. Maeterlinck’s play had already inspired Claude Debussy, who turned it into an opera, Pelléas et Mélisande, which premiered in 1902.

Schoenberg’s conception was very different from Debussy’s. Where Debussy dissolved drama into subtle Impressionism, Schoenberg embraced the Wagnerian symphonic tradition and sought to render the entire psychological arc of the drama into one vast, continuous orchestral movement.

It was Schoenberg’s friend and champion Alexander von Zemlinsky who first suggested that he compose a tone poem based on Maeterlinck’s play. Initially, Schoenberg considered writing an opera, but he soon decided that the drama’s inwardness and dark atmosphere might be better realized in purely orchestral terms. Thus Pelleas und Melisande became a symphonic poem—though on a scale and with a structural complexity that make it closer to a symphony in disguise.

Composed between 1902 and 1903, the work is written for enormous orchestra and unfolds in a single, unbroken span of roughly 40–45 minutes. Schoenberg follows the dramatic sequence of Maeterlinck’s play: Golaud’s discovery of Mélisande in the forest; her marriage in the gloomy castle; her growing, ambiguous bond with Pelléas; the fatal jealousy; Pelléas’s murder; and Mélisande’s death after childbirth. But the narrative is not presented theatrically. Instead, it is transformed into a dense web of leitmotifs—clearly indebted to Wagner, especially Tristan und Isolde—that undergo constant development and transformation.

What is striking about the origins of the piece is that Schoenberg still believed himself entirely within the bounds of tonality. The work is nominally in D minor, but its chromatic saturation stretches tonal coherence almost to breaking point.

In hindsight, one can hear the seeds of the atonal revolution that he would inaugurate a few years later with works such as Erwartung. Pelleas und Melisande represents the moment when late Romantic harmonic expansion reaches its limit.

The premiere in Vienna in 1905 was not a success. The audience and critics found it overlong, opaque and excessively complex. Its thick counterpoint and extreme harmonic language seemed willfully difficult. Yet Schoenberg himself regarded the work as a major achievement—a demonstration that the symphonic poem could sustain the deepest psychological drama without recourse to the stage.

In this performance from 2019, the Frankfurt Radio Symphony is conducted by David Afkham.

00:48:42
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Live Chat
October 26, 2026
Monday Night At The Movies: "The Hunt" (2012)

Join Gagglers for "The Hunt"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

01:50:46
October 25, 2026
TG 2201: Israel's Elections: Is Bibi About To Pull Off A Great Escape Act?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the upcoming Israeli elections, and wonder whether the great political survivor, Bibi Netanyahu, will manage to prevail against the odds--yet again.

01:01:55
October 25, 2026
TG 2200: Serbia's Elections: EU/NGOs Call For Violence If Results Don't Go Their Way

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss today's elections in Serbia, and the strong likelihood that there wll be an eruption of violence should the results fail to go the way the European Union and their attendant NGOs desire.

00:48:22

Colby is one of the masterminds behind the US strategy to sequencing conflicts against Russia, Iran and China.

Their plan was produced during Trumps first admin (2016-2020) and has so far been carried out in Europe and the Middle East.

Their goal is to tie Russia and Iran down in individual battles and force their allies in Europe and the Middle East to hand together and contain them so they can free up the US military to surround China.

So far, their plan is working. NATO increased their GDP spending from 2% to 5% and Western Europe has pumped hundreds of billions into Ukraine.

Turkey, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia formed the Mecca alliance and are now working together to fight Ansarallah while Israel fights Hezbollah and the US handles Iran.

Whether they succeed in the end depends on how long Russia and Iran keep the fight going for. So far, neither have proven to be easy to defeat.

I made a video about the US war strategy of sequencing

You can watch it below 👇
...

Trump has called President Erdogan twice in less than 24 hours. One thing is very clear. They are going to attack Iran and the nature of the attack requires Turkey to stand off in 3 areas: Syrian airspace, Azerbaijan and smuggling of mercenaries from Iraq into Iran.
https://x.com/DanaNawzarAli/status/2115923868082745743?a=kMJ40qYrq3jrurUEsA8&s=20

13 hours ago
January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals