TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
February 23, 2026
The Gaggle Music Club: Arnold Schoenberg’s Pelleas und Melisande

This week’s selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Arnold Schoenberg’s Pelleas und Melisande, Op. 5. Composed in 1902-03, the work stands at the crossroads between late Romanticism and 20th century Modernism.

The composition is based on the Symbolist drama Pelléas et Mélisande (1892) by Belgian playwright Maurice Maeterlinck. Maeterlinck’s play had already inspired Claude Debussy, who turned it into an opera, Pelléas et Mélisande, which premiered in 1902.

Schoenberg’s conception was very different from Debussy’s. Where Debussy dissolved drama into subtle Impressionism, Schoenberg embraced the Wagnerian symphonic tradition and sought to render the entire psychological arc of the drama into one vast, continuous orchestral movement.

It was Schoenberg’s friend and champion Alexander von Zemlinsky who first suggested that he compose a tone poem based on Maeterlinck’s play. Initially, Schoenberg considered writing an opera, but he soon decided that the drama’s inwardness and dark atmosphere might be better realized in purely orchestral terms. Thus Pelleas und Melisande became a symphonic poem—though on a scale and with a structural complexity that make it closer to a symphony in disguise.

Composed between 1902 and 1903, the work is written for enormous orchestra and unfolds in a single, unbroken span of roughly 40–45 minutes. Schoenberg follows the dramatic sequence of Maeterlinck’s play: Golaud’s discovery of Mélisande in the forest; her marriage in the gloomy castle; her growing, ambiguous bond with Pelléas; the fatal jealousy; Pelléas’s murder; and Mélisande’s death after childbirth. But the narrative is not presented theatrically. Instead, it is transformed into a dense web of leitmotifs—clearly indebted to Wagner, especially Tristan und Isolde—that undergo constant development and transformation.

What is striking about the origins of the piece is that Schoenberg still believed himself entirely within the bounds of tonality. The work is nominally in D minor, but its chromatic saturation stretches tonal coherence almost to breaking point.

In hindsight, one can hear the seeds of the atonal revolution that he would inaugurate a few years later with works such as Erwartung. Pelleas und Melisande represents the moment when late Romantic harmonic expansion reaches its limit.

The premiere in Vienna in 1905 was not a success. The audience and critics found it overlong, opaque and excessively complex. Its thick counterpoint and extreme harmonic language seemed willfully difficult. Yet Schoenberg himself regarded the work as a major achievement—a demonstration that the symphonic poem could sustain the deepest psychological drama without recourse to the stage.

In this performance from 2019, the Frankfurt Radio Symphony is conducted by David Afkham.

00:48:42
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Monday Night At The Movies: "Absence of Malice" (1981)

Join Gagglers for "Absence of Malice"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

01:56:15
TG 2110: Macron Announces: U.S., Russia and China All Stand Against Europe

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Macron's latest declaration, made in Greece, that Europe is now confronting, at one and the same time, a hostile United States, China and Russia.

01:06:59
TG 2109: Yet Another Attempt on the Life of Trump

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the latest attempt on the life of President Trump.

00:22:29

We are told government exists to make possible what markets alone cannot.

The ongoing energy crisis forces the opposite conclusion.

When the Soviet Union needed industrial capacity, it turned to Albert Kahn Associates, a private firm, to design and build its factories, factories it could not build itself. When Europe needed gas, pipelines and financing emerged from commercial consortia. The global oil system pipelines, terminals, tankers, insurance, and trading is a market-built machine designed to keep energy flowing.

Markets solve the impossible problem: find supply, assemble capital, build infrastructure, deliver energy across continents.

Then government intervenes and destroys the system throughout a variety of tactics up to the physical destruction of Nordstream.

Permits halted.
Exports frozen.
Sanctions imposed.
Energy shipments through the Persian Gulf constrained not by capacity, but by state conflict.
Infrastructure like Nord Stream AG rendered inert not by engineering limits, but by ...

OSINTtechnical
@Osinttechnical
·
55 m
A Malian official says that “The Russians betrayed us” after Russia’s Africa Corps negotiated a withdrawal with rebel forces in the northern city of Kidal -RFI

Russian forces are reportedly preparing to withdraw from additional positions in northern Mali.

:)))) fell for it again award

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals