TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Russian Foreign Policy: Differential Respect

The Russians are known to be very punctilious in their diplomatic exchanges. They are not however always respectful. Case in point: yesterday's telephone conversation between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and U.K. Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab.

As the Russian readout makes clear, the phone call took place at the initiative of the U.K. This isn't surprising. The British always follow the Americans. The moment Washington decided to make nice with Moscow, it was inevitable that London would immediately follow its lead. However, if Boris Johnson's government was expecting the courteous, respectful treatment that the Biden administration received, it was in for a rude awakening. While Russia may dislike the United States, Russia respects it as a Great Power and a formidable adversary. Russia does not accord the same respect to the United Kingdom.

Russia refuses to regard the U.K. as a serious power. Russia does not regard the U.K. as an independent actor on the world stage. As Russia sees it, the U.K. either follows the United States slavishly or worse (as has happened in recent years), the U.K. tries to be more Catholic than the Pope. In other words, the U.K. tries to be more hawkish, more belligerent toward the U.S.'s adversaries, than the United States itself. Not surprisingly, Russia refuses to accord the U.K. even the grudging respect it is willing to accord, say, France or Germany. France and Germany at times distance themselves from the United States, particularly on issues that matter to Russia such as Ukraine.

Russia's lack of respect for the U.K. of Boris Johnson is only too apparent from the Russian readout of the phone conversation between Lavrov and Raab. I have attached a Google Translate version of the Russian readout. The U.K. readout, by contrast, is terse and pro forma:

On 17 June, the Foreign Secretary spoke to Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov.

They discussed a number of issues where the UK and Russia profoundly differ, but also key global challenges such as international security, COVID-19, and climate change ahead of COP26.

The pair agreed to speak again soon.

Clearly, the U.K. got an earful, and did not enjoy it very much.

The English translation of the Russian readout is a little rough, but the gist is clear.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2165: Ian Proud: Where Did All The Diplomats Go?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle sat down for a conversation with long-serving former UK diplomat Ian Proud to discuss: Whatever happened to the craft of diplomacy, a skill Europeans, including the British, once possessed in abundance?

To order Ian Proud's novel: https://www.waterstones.com/book/searching/ian-t-proud/9781739543136

00:50:25
TG 2164: Putin Warns West: "You Seize Our Ships, We Seize Yours"

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Russian President Putin's stark warning to the West: Russia will retaliate against any seizure of Russian vessels by Western countries by seizure of Western vessels.

00:54:24
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Body Heat" (1981)

Join Gagglers for "Body Heat"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

01:53:12
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Aug. 10.

To mark the dog-days of August, the theme of this poll is heatwaves and extreme heat in films.

Please continue to vote in this poll after Aug. 10, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Aug. 17.

The Trump and Witkoff families are opening a bank in Florida. The investors in this bank are undisclosed. It will not have to follow FDIC rules.

I smell a money-laundering opportunity.
https://x.com/PiperK/status/2088517170770931770?s=20

Amid the narrative that the "US is losing" or "run by Israel" —there are no serious attempts to understand Washington's grand strategy.

On the Substack charts for 4 months straight: how the US took on Iran, Venezuela, Russia and seized the planet's fuel.
https://x.com/richimedhurst/status/2088404648793121182?s=20

This Caused CONTROVERSY - Russia's Opposition Has NO Strategy to END the War!

Silicon Curtain

192K subscribers

Aug 14, 2026

DESCRIPTION: Nigel Gould-Davies on the Russian Exiled Opposition: Sanctions, Strategy, and the War in Ukraine

Nigel Gould-Davies returns to discuss controversial articles he wrote about the Russian exiled opposition, arguing many share the radical goal of ending or “liquidating” the Putin regime yet lobby Western governments for restrained policies that undermine that objective. He critiques calls to narrow sanctions, push a postwar “Marshall Plan” for Russia, liberalize large-scale Russian immigration to Europe, and oppose transferring roughly $300B in frozen Russian central bank assets to Ukraine, contending these steps would aid Russia’s war capacity and pose counterintelligence risks. Gould-Davies stresses sanctions are essential to constraining the Russian war machine and that easing them would increase ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals