TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Russian Foreign Policy: Differential Respect

The Russians are known to be very punctilious in their diplomatic exchanges. They are not however always respectful. Case in point: yesterday's telephone conversation between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and U.K. Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab.

As the Russian readout makes clear, the phone call took place at the initiative of the U.K. This isn't surprising. The British always follow the Americans. The moment Washington decided to make nice with Moscow, it was inevitable that London would immediately follow its lead. However, if Boris Johnson's government was expecting the courteous, respectful treatment that the Biden administration received, it was in for a rude awakening. While Russia may dislike the United States, Russia respects it as a Great Power and a formidable adversary. Russia does not accord the same respect to the United Kingdom.

Russia refuses to regard the U.K. as a serious power. Russia does not regard the U.K. as an independent actor on the world stage. As Russia sees it, the U.K. either follows the United States slavishly or worse (as has happened in recent years), the U.K. tries to be more Catholic than the Pope. In other words, the U.K. tries to be more hawkish, more belligerent toward the U.S.'s adversaries, than the United States itself. Not surprisingly, Russia refuses to accord the U.K. even the grudging respect it is willing to accord, say, France or Germany. France and Germany at times distance themselves from the United States, particularly on issues that matter to Russia such as Ukraine.

Russia's lack of respect for the U.K. of Boris Johnson is only too apparent from the Russian readout of the phone conversation between Lavrov and Raab. I have attached a Google Translate version of the Russian readout. The U.K. readout, by contrast, is terse and pro forma:

On 17 June, the Foreign Secretary spoke to Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov.

They discussed a number of issues where the UK and Russia profoundly differ, but also key global challenges such as international security, COVID-19, and climate change ahead of COP26.

The pair agreed to speak again soon.

Clearly, the U.K. got an earful, and did not enjoy it very much.

The English translation of the Russian readout is a little rough, but the gist is clear.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2088: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 16: Asymmetric War Gets Evermore Asymmetric

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Day 16 of the U.S.-Israel War On Iran, and conclude that, while the United States has gone through plans A, B and C, Iran has so far stuck to its strategy of inflicting as much pain as possible on its adversaries.

01:20:22
TG 2087: U.S.-Israel War On Iran Day 14: Is There Any Way To Get Out Of This Mess?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle examine how the war that the United States and Israel launched against Iran 13 days ago is going, and wonder whether there is any way it can end without escalating into a world war.

01:31:47
International Committee To Defend Slobodan Milošević

This is the news conference from Belgrade, March 10, 2026. Unfortunately, almost all of it, with the exception of George Szamuely's contribution, is in Serbian.

01:56:42
The Putin-Clinton Conversations

Vladimir Putin and Bill Clinton discussed removing Slobodan Milošević from power 20 years ago. This is a sad read. Putin did as little to help Milošević (the man who withstood 11 weeks of NATO bombing) as he did 14 years later Viktor Yanukovych.

https://amp.meduza.io/en/feature/2020/10/08/the-regime-changers

Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, March 9.

The theme is "Coups and Military Dictatorships."

Please continue to vote after March 9, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on March 16.

This is absolutely insane:

Prior to the Iran war, US oil companies were generating ~$62 billion in annual free cash flow with oil prices at $55/barrel.

Now, with oil prices at $100/barrel, US oil companies are expected to generate $163 billion in annual free cash flow, if current prices are sustained.

In other words, US oil giants are set to rake in an additional +$100 BILLION in free cash flow per year if oil prices remain elevated.

We are arguably witnessing the most profitable market conditions in history for US big oil. https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2032977830234214487?s=20

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals