TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
10 hours ago

So, to answer KomradDirty’s question which we started this post with, should he be worried about Russia buckling first, yes I think you should be worried about that unfortunately. It’s not that Europe, Israel and the U.S. are mad strong. It’s that Moscow is making a totally concious decision to play this sick game on very hard mode while Russia’s enemies get to play on beginner mode basically. All of Russia is fair game while Ukraine’s Rear is utterly off limits to Russian retaliation. The result is that now days Ukraine is hitting Russia proper harder with drones than Russia is hitting Ukraine. Terrible optics aside, this is alarming because Russia doesn’t just import everything it fights with from abroad like Ukraine does. Russia uses foreign components in its drones and missiles, but they are assembled in Russia, Ukraine on the other hand is increasingly importing drones and a far higher proportion of its Military equipment is imported than is Russia’s. Damn near all of Ukraine’s vehicles are imported in contrast to Russia who uses all domestic equipment save for some North Korean Artillery Pieces and Ammunition. We also have touched on how Russia does not even hit anything of critical importance inside Ukraine, which is a conscious choice on Moskow’s end. As for the manpower question yes, Russia has a much bigger population, but they are not mobilizing this population so it’s a moot point when Ukraine is mobilizing like there is no tomorrow. Ukraine has a serious problem with desertion, people are increasingly fighting with Kiev’s Military Slave Drivers, and it would be dishonest to imply that everything is fine for the hohols on the manpower front. But will Ukraine’s manpower problems deliver Russia everything east of the Dnieper? No. They probably won’t even deliver Kramatorsk and Slavyansk if we are being honest with ourselves. The hohols rage about their manpower issues because contrary to NAFO claims Ukraine is very, very, slowly losing ground everywhere and that’s even after they retake a few kilometers here and there. Every turnip patch lost is seriously painful for the Ukrainians, but it’s a huge mistake to conflate hohols seething over the loss of an outhouse with Russian Troops marching into Odessa. I can’t exactly promise anyone that Russia will buckle first but that is a possibility that needs to be taken very seriously. My personal feeling is that we will get a stalemate sometime in the next few years, maybe Russia will get all of Donbass in this round, maybe not. 50-50 chance IMO and since only completely liquidating Ukrainian Statehood constitutes Russian Victory that means Russia is taking an L regardless of where the front line runs. https://open.substack.com/pub/drlivci/p/will-russia-or-ukraine-win-the-race?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=o786d

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Monday Night At The Movies: "Absence of Malice" (1981)

Join Gagglers for "Absence of Malice"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

01:56:15
TG 2110: Macron Announces: U.S., Russia and China All Stand Against Europe

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Macron's latest declaration, made in Greece, that Europe is now confronting, at one and the same time, a hostile United States, China and Russia.

01:06:59
TG 2109: Yet Another Attempt on the Life of Trump

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the latest attempt on the life of President Trump.

00:22:29
5 hours ago

Still relevant today and proves that Trump or no Trump it really makes no difference .

18 hours ago

We are told government exists to make possible what markets alone cannot.

The ongoing energy crisis forces the opposite conclusion.

When the Soviet Union needed industrial capacity, it turned to Albert Kahn Associates, a private firm, to design and build its factories, factories it could not build itself. When Europe needed gas, pipelines and financing emerged from commercial consortia. The global oil system pipelines, terminals, tankers, insurance, and trading is a market-built machine designed to keep energy flowing.

Markets solve the impossible problem: find supply, assemble capital, build infrastructure, deliver energy across continents.

Then government intervenes and destroys the system throughout a variety of tactics up to the physical destruction of Nordstream.

Permits halted.
Exports frozen.
Sanctions imposed.
Energy shipments through the Persian Gulf constrained not by capacity, but by state conflict.
Infrastructure like Nord Stream AG rendered inert not by engineering limits, but by ...

18 hours ago

OSINTtechnical
@Osinttechnical
·
55 m
A Malian official says that “The Russians betrayed us” after Russia’s Africa Corps negotiated a withdrawal with rebel forces in the northern city of Kidal -RFI

Russian forces are reportedly preparing to withdraw from additional positions in northern Mali.

:)))) fell for it again award

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals