TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Documents Confirm U.K. Was Seeking Confrontation With Russia

Hard to know what to make of this BBC story. First, it's hard to believe MoD employees can walk out of the office with classified documents stuffed in their briefcases. Second, it's hard to believe people still read documents in paper format and not online. Third, it's hard to believe that an MoD employee, having walked out of the office with classified documents, would then be stupid enough to leave documents behind on a bus or at a bus stop--while he went off for a pint. But this is what the BBC will have us believe happened.

Be that as it may, if the documents found in Kent are what they purport to be, then it seems the MoD knew that Russia would respond forcefully to HMS Defender's entry into territorial waters around Crimea.

"Following the controversy generated by HMS Defender's mission," the BBC writes, "the documents discovered in Kent confirm that passage...was a calculated decision by the British government to make a show of support for Ukraine, despite the possible risks involved."

To what end? Since 2014, the British have repeated ad nauseam that they do not recognize Crime as part of the Russian Federation. Fine. They are entitled to hold that position. But what do they hope to achieve now? Do the British plan to "liberate" Crimea? Do they plan to make a landing on Crimea? Do they plan to fight a war with Russia on behalf of Ukraine? There are no answers to these questions in these documents. One must assume the answer is no.

The BBC helpfully continues:

Was this gunboat diplomacy? It was certainly the use of a warship in pursuit of diplomatic goals. But its primary objective was not to "poke the Russian bear" (a phrase and sentiment conspicuously absent from the documents). This was all about freedom of navigation and a clear endorsement of Ukraine's sovereignty, following Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014.

This of course is a nonsensical argument. The British do not recognize Israeli annexation of the Golan Heights. Do the British therefore plan to make an excursion to the Golan Heights next week? Russia holds that Kosovo continues to be part of Serbia. Should we expect Russian forces tomorrow to enter Kosovo having perhaps been granted permission to do so by the Belgrade authorities?

What Boris Johnson's government did this week was nothing other than "poking the bear." The British were antagonizing Russia with no strategic goal in mind other than antagonizing her. There is nothing whatsoever the British can do about Crimea other than to make pointless gestures. If that's all there was to it, that might be harmless enough. If push comes to shove, the British can always quickly de-escalate, scarper and cry: "It was all meant in fun, and a jolly good time was had by one and all."

On the other hand, to the extent that such actions on the part of the British lead the authorities in Kiev to believe that the British or the Americans or NATO might go to war on their behalf to "win back" Crimea or the Donbass, then such actions are the height of recklessness. They serve only to fuel further war in Ukraine, a war that Ukraine cannot hope to win and can only lead to a national catastrophe.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57624942.amp

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
December 29, 2025
Monday Night At The Movies: "The Sorrow And The Pity" Part II (1969)

Join Gagglers for "The Sorrow and the Pity" Part II!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

02:13:06
December 28, 2025
TG 2037: Zelensky Comes To Mar-A-Lago Trying To Entice Trump Into War

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Ukraine President Zelensky's visit to President Trump at Mar-A-Lago, where he will tout his 20-point peace plan in order to ensnare the American president in a protracted war against Russia.

00:56:24
December 28, 2025
TG 2038: The Bush-Putin Conversations II

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle return to the subject of the conversations that took place from 2001 to 2008 between presidents George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin, during which the subject of the threat to Russia posed by an enlarged NATO repeatedly came up.

00:32:21
16 hours ago

This is fascinating:

16 hours ago

I guess Ukraine will pay dearly for this dastardly deed, just like they paid when they destroyed the Tupolevs...
Никола Миковић / Nikola Mikovic
@nikola_mikovic
·
16 h
According to Lavrov, on December 28–29, Ukraine attacked the Russian president’s residence in the Novgorod region.

If that really happened, why didn’t the Kremlin report it first thing on the morning of December 29, instead of waiting until the evening?

What a charade.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals