TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Gaggle Music Club: Sergei Prokofiev’s Piano Concerto No. 3

The latest selection of The Gaggle Music Club is Sergei Prokofiev's Piano Concerto No. 3 in C major, Op. 26. Prokofiev composed this work—one of his most popular with concertgoers—during a particularly unsettled period of his life: the decade spanning World War I, the Russian Revolution and his first years of living as an émigré.

Born in 1891 on an estate in what is now Ukraine, Prokofiev entered the St. Petersburg Conservatory at the age of 13. His teachers admired his technical brilliance but found his music abrasive and deliberately provocative. His First Piano Concerto, composed in 1912, scandalized some audiences with its aggressive energy and uncompromising modernism. His Second Concerto, composed a year later, elicited an even more negative response.

By 1913–14, however, Prokofiev was beginning to look beyond sheer virtuosity. Though a brilliant pianist who astonished audiences with his dazzling technique and rhythmic precision, he wanted to be accepted as a serious composer. He sought to combine sharp modern rhythms with lyricism, wit and classical balance. He accomplished this in the Third Concerto.

The earliest material for the concerto dates from around 1913. Prokofiev kept notebooks filled with sketches, melodic fragments and harmonic ideas. Preserving musical ideas rather than putting them to immediate use became one of his characteristic working methods. Rather than compose works continuously from start to finish, he tended to accumulate material until he found the right structure into which he could fit it.

An important intermediate stage toward the composition of the Third Piano Concerto was a projected work called the White Piano Concerto. Prokofiev had envisaged composing a concerto in which the piano would participate almost continuously without the traditional orchestral tuttis (passages in which the full orchestra plays together) that characterized 19th century concertos. The idea ultimately proved impractical, and Prokofiev abandoned the project. Nevertheless, several musical ideas that Prokofiev originally intended to use in the White Concerto eventually found their way into the Third Piano Concerto.

The outbreak of the World War I interrupted many of Prokofiev’s artistic plans. The 1917 Russian Revolution overturned the political and cultural world in which Prokofiev had grown up. Unlike some later Soviet composers, Prokofiev did not immediately commit himself either to the Bolshevik regime or to permanent exile. Instead, he sought official permission to leave Russia, arguing that he wished to continue his career abroad. In 1918 the Soviet authorities, surprisingly, granted him permission, and he departed for the United States by way of Japan.

Prokofiev had not completed the concerto before his departure, and carried it with him in the form of sketches and ideas.

No immediate triumph awaited him in America. Although his performances as a pianist attracted attention, audiences were less receptive to his musical compositions.

By 1920 Prokofiev had moved to France, settling for a time near Paris, which had become the principal center of Russian émigré artistic life. There he encountered figures such as Igor Stravinsky, Sergei Diaghilev and the cosmopolitan artistic circles surrounding the Ballets Russes. These encounters influenced him profoundly. Parisian appetite for wit and elegance encouraged Prokofiev to temper the uncompromising aggressiveness of his early compositions.

The earliest surviving material for the Third Concerto goes back to 1913. In that year Prokofiev sketched out what eventually would become the theme of the second movement. Then, in 1916, he composed two variations on that theme. Thus, by 1916, he already had the basic theme-and-variations idea, but he did not yet have the finished concerto.

Then, when Prokofiev finally assembled the Third Concerto in 1917–21, he took this existing material and expanded it into the complete second movement: theme + variations + coda.

It was during the summer of 1921, while he was staying in the Breton village of Saint-Brévin-les-Pins, that Prokofiev finally assembled the disparate materials into the concerto that we know today. The timing is revealing. He had already composed major works such as the opera The Love for Three Oranges, yet he remained eager to establish himself internationally as both composer and virtuoso pianist. A new concerto would serve both purposes simultaneously.

Prokofiev’s third piano concerto differs markedly from his previous works. The opening clarinet melody, simple and almost pastoral, serves as an unlikely prelude for the dazzling piano entrance that follows. Throughout the work Prokofiev alternates passages of astonishing brilliance with moments of extraordinary lyricism.

The finale perhaps best illustrates what makes the concerto unique. It contains the percussive keyboard writing that was characteristic of the young Prokofiev, yet it is integrated into a structure of remarkable coherence. Rather than overwhelm the orchestra, the piano engages in continuous dialogue with it. The concerto is a brilliantly conceived conversation between soloist and orchestra.

The Third Piano Concerto premiered on Dec. 16, 1921, in Chicago. Prokofiev himself was the soloist, with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra conducted by Frederick Stock. The reception was favorable, though scarcely ecstatic. U.S. critics admired the composer’s creativity with the piano but remained divided over the music itself. Some heard only harsh modernism; others recognized a true originality.

Over time, however, the concerto acquired a reputation surpassing that of any of Prokofiev's other piano concertos. Pianists have come to regard the work as embodying a perfect balance between technical brilliance and musical seriousness. Playing the piano concerto demands immense dexterity—rapid repeated notes, huge leaps and intricate rhythms—but never for its own sake. Every technical challenge serves a musical purpose.

Perhaps the deepest significance of the concerto lies in its position within Prokofiev's artistic development. It marks the moment when he ceased to be merely the brilliant enfant terrible of Russian modernism and became a mature composer capable of reconciling modernist energy with classical proportion, wit and lyrical beauty.

The concerto's long gestation, stretching from the years before World War I through the Russian Revolution, exile and artistic reinvention, is discernible in its extraordinary synthesis of youthful audacity and mature craftsmanship.

It is, in many respects, the work in which Prokofiev discovered his own distinctive voice—a voice that would later produce masterpieces such as the ballets Romeo and Juliet and Cinderella, the Fifth Symphony and the late piano sonatas. For that reason, the Third Piano Concerto is not merely his most frequently performed concerto; it is the work that most perfectly captures the complex, brilliant and often paradoxical character of his musical personality.

In this performance of Prokofiev's Piano Concerto No.3 from Feb. 1, 2020, Martha Argerich is soloist and Darío Alejandro Ntaca conducts the Singapore Symphony Orchestra.

00:33:14
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2195: Serbia's Election: National Independence Is On The Ballot

George Szamuely and Serbian political analyst, Vladimir Kršljanin, discuss the Oct. 25 parliamentary election in Serbia, and wonder whether any real political change will follow in Belgrade.

01:07:51
Live Chat
October 12, 2026
Monday Night At The Movies: "Colossus: The Forbin Project" (1970)

Join Gagglers for "Colossus: The Forbin Project"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

01:36:06
October 11, 2026
TG 2194: Is Trump Planning To Do Regime Change In Ukraine?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's agreement with President Putin to release Russian diesel oil on world markets, followed by the U.S. president's call for the removal of President Zelensky from power in Ukraine, and wonder whether the American and the Russian have a plan in place for regime change in Kiev.

00:45:55

JUST IN: “Where Is the Air Defense? Where Are the Billions?!” Kyiv Mayor Fires Back at Zelensky’s Accusations

Vitali Klitschko denies that the Ukrainian capital was poorly prepared for winter. “That’s not true. And everyone is in shock today,” he declared emotionally in parliament.

Klitschko also demanded answers about what happened to the billions allocated to protect Kyiv from air attacks. He rejected accusations that city authorities were responsible for the heating problems.

Later, in a Telegram post, Klitschko wrote that Kyiv continues to operate, rebuild, repair infrastructure, and keep the city running while the enemy attacks and destroys it day and night.

“Meanwhile, all you hear on TV is that something is wrong in Kyiv, that something hasn’t been done properly. You can say whatever you want — you can even blame Klitschko for World War III…” the mayor said in his defense, suggesting that the real problem lies not with city authorities but with corruption and internal power ...

BREAKING: Pashinyan Proposes Territorial Swap with Azerbaijan

Armenia’s prime minister has put forward a plan to redraw the borders between the two countries to eliminate enclaves and exclaves.

What is Pashinyan proposing?

▪️ Exchange territories of comparable size.
▪️ Open all transport routes between the two countries.
▪️ Drop all mutual territorial claims.

“Yerevan and Baku must leave each other alone on all issues — including Karabakh, Gardian, Shirman, Nakhchivan, or Western Azerbaijan,” Pashinyan said.
According to him, Armenia and Azerbaijan now have a real chance to achieve peace.

In August 2025, the leaders of both countries signed a joint declaration in Washington, brokered by Trump. It includes plans for a transport route through Armenia connecting mainland Azerbaijan with Nakhchivan.

14 hours ago

BREAKING: ENOCH BURKE’S BANK ACCOUNT NOW HAS €0.00 BALANCE AFTER COURTS RAID €40,617.69

Teacher Enoch Burke refused to endorse transgenderism in his school. His entire bank account has now been seized by the Irish Courts.

The Courts have also directed that the Irish Attorney General Rossa Fanning may apply to seize any other assets owned by Enoch Burke.

The root cause of this case was the principal's direction to all staff to address a male student by a new name and the "they" pronoun. This demand had no legal authority and has never been assessed for its constitutionality or lawfulness by any Court.
https://x.com/WWG1WGA_QQ/status/2110040221400055983?s=20

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals