TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pakistan is moving closer to directly confronting the Iran-backed Houthis, deploying 30,000 to 40,000 troops inside Saudi Arabia as the war escalates.

This is not yet a Pakistani invasion of Yemen. The troops are holding Saudi borders and helping intercept Houthi missiles and drones. Their purpose is to protect Saudi territory, oil infrastructure and the Islamic holy sites while Saudi Arabia prepares a major offensive.

The ground war would be fought by Yemeni forces under Saudi command, backed by Saudi airstrikes. More than 100,000 Yemeni troops could be mobilized to retake Bab el-Mandeb or attack across several fronts.

Pakistan is already enabling that campaign. It sent four cargo aircraft carrying air-defence systems, artillery, drones and anti-drone equipment into Aden. Pakistani military advisers are working with Saudi counterparts supporting Yemeni forces.

Turkey has supplied drones, France is reinforcing Yanbu and the United States is providing intelligence and military advice. The Houthis are no longer facing fractured Yemeni forces and Saudi aircraft alone. A wider military architecture is forming against them.

Pakistan once tried to rescue the Islamic Republic diplomatically by brokering the Islamabad Memorandum with the United States. Now the same country has joined Saudi Arabia and Turkey in a collective-defence pact that treats an attack on one as an attack on all.

Pakistan’s defence minister has declared that any enemy of Saudi Arabia is an enemy of Pakistan. Its military has described the commitment to defend Saudi Arabia and the holy sites as physical, unconditional and absolute.

Pakistan has not decided to send combat troops into Yemen, but the operational line is already shifting. Its forces are intercepting Houthi attacks, protecting the Saudi rear and advising the forces preparing to advance. That is military involvement even without Pakistani infantry crossing the border.

It also places tens of thousands of Pakistani troops directly in the line of Houthi missile and drone fire. Every successful interception and every Pakistani-supported operation increases the possibility of Pakistani casualties and retaliation. The distance between defending Saudi Arabia and entering the war is rapidly shrinking.

A direct Pakistan–Islamic Republic confrontation is no longer unthinkable. The two countries share a volatile 900-kilometre border and exchanged strikes in January 2024. The Islamic Republic attacked targets inside Pakistan with missiles and drones, killing two children. Pakistan retaliated two days later with drones, rockets and stand-off weapons against targets inside Iran. At least nine people were killed.

Both sides contained that crisis, but it demonstrated how quickly their relationship can move from diplomacy to cross-border warfare. Pakistan now supporting Saudi operations against the Islamic Republic’s most important remaining regional proxy creates another potential ignition point.

If Houthi weapons kill Pakistani troops, strike the holy sites or are traced directly to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Pakistan could retaliate against Houthi infrastructure, Iranian-linked networks or targets connected to the weapons pipeline. The Islamic Republic could answer through proxies, border pressure or further support for attacks on Saudi territory.

For the Islamic Republic, the danger is political and strategic. Every Houthi missile that lands inside Saudi Arabia now risks activating a defence pact involving nuclear-armed Pakistan. The regime can deny controlling the Houthis, but Pakistan has already warned it to restrain them.

The Islamic Republic built its proxy network to surround its enemies while avoiding direct consequences. Instead, its Houthi campaign has helped place tens of thousands of Pakistani troops behind Saudi Arabia, exposed those troops to Iranian-supplied weapons and pushed a former mediator toward the opposing military camp.

The proxy was supposed to isolate Saudi Arabia. It is building the coalition that may eventually destroy it.
Citat
WarMonitor🇺🇦🇬🇧
@WarMonitor3
·
1 h
Pakistan has deployed up to 40,000 soldiers to Saudi Arabia in order to defend it from missile and drone attacks-Reuters
https://x.com/TheIranWatcher/status/2106113863154368671?s=20

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2189: Putin Laments Lost Opportunities At Cold War's End

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Putin's speech and subsequent Q&A at this year's Valdai conference, and highlight his repeated laments that relations between the West and Russia could have gone in a very different direction had the West not chosen to exploit its temporary advantage.

01:08:52
Live Chat
September 28, 2026
Monday Night At The Movies: "La Revolution Française" (1989)

Join Gagglers for "La Revolution Française"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

02:33:59
September 27, 2026
TG 2188: Switzerland Votes On Retaining Its Neutrality

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss Switzerland's referendum on retaining its neutrality, and wonder whether the NATOization of the country can be averted.

00:42:59
September 30, 2026
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, Oct. 5.

The theme of the poll is films that feature superintelligence, superbrains, computers more powerful than the brain of man, machines taking control.

Please continue to vote in this poll after Oct. 5, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on Oct. 12.

October 01, 2026

1. Russia Threatens NUCLEAR War If NATO Touches Kaliningrad | Dr. George Szamuely

Jamarl Thomas

78.2K subscribers

254 views Premiered 72 minutes ago

Russia Threatens NUCLEAR War If NATO Touches Kaliningrad | Dr. George Szamuely

Saudi Arabia Prepares Offensive to Retake Bab el-Mandeb From Houthis

🇸🇦Saudi Arabia is preparing an offensive against 🇾🇪Yemen's Houthis, possibly within weeks and by early November, Reuters reports.

The main goal is retaking Bab el-Mandeb, the Red Sea's southern gate, which the Houthis seized last month.

More than 100,000 Yemeni troops could be mobilized with Saudi air support.

Riyadh is weighing a limited coastal assault or a wider multi-front campaign across Yemen.

🇺🇸The US is providing intelligence and targeting data but won't fight directly.

🇵🇰Pakistan has 30,000–40,000 troops inside Saudi Arabia for air and missile defense.

🇫🇷France is sending air defenses and troops to protect Yanbu.

This is about oil before it's about Yemen.

Saudi Arabia's way around Hormuz is the East-West pipeline and it ends at Yanbu on the Red Sea.

With the Houthis holding Bab el-Mandeb, those barrels can only leave north through Suez.

Riyadh has rerouted around one chokepoint and now has to fight for the second.

...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals