TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

In a major ratcheting-up of the debate on the next EU budget, frugal countries are increasingly linking it to the other big political contest on the agenda: funding Ukraine.

The issue is likely to surface in next week’s informal European Council in Dublin, officially devoted to AI. But diplomats say the EU’s long-term budget and Ukraine will be the real battle lines.

EU leaders have set an end-of-year deadline to clinch a deal on the EU’s next seven-year budget, while also aiming to decide how to find €70 billion for Ukraine on the same timeline. The two tracks are now increasingly on a collision course.

The EU executive is preparing options expected to lean heavily towards another loan for Kyiv, and some capitals see an opening to put pressure on those resisting cuts to the EU budget.

Several countries fiercely protective of EU regional and farm spending are also reluctant to fund further support for Ukraine. Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Bulgaria have ruled out taking on the burden of another loan.

The number of countries opposed to supporting Ukraine is expected to grow in the next year as a series of national elections, from France to Poland, make it more difficult to muster political support for Ukraine loans.

Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands – all major contributors to Kyiv’s war effort – are now using that contradiction to press the 17-strong cohesion club, arguing that protecting regional spending while withholding support for Ukraine is increasingly harder to justify.

But not all frugals are in favour of linking the two topics. Support for Kyiv must continue even if budget talks drag into next spring, Joakim Strand, Finland’s European affairs minister, told Rapporteur.

“We need to be able to support Ukraine, no matter what happens with the MFF,” he told my colleague Magnus Lund Nielsen.

In another sign of how high the stakes are, Valdis Dombrovskis, the economy commissioner, warned there would be broader consequences if the EU failed to find extra funding for Ukraine.
 

Shaping Ukraine’s post-war future

A separate meeting on security guarantees is taking place at NATO headquarters today, following talks on Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction in Brussels on Wednesday.

The discussions on Wednesday brought together representatives from Ukraine, the US, France, Germany and the UK, NATO and the World Bank, with the agenda centred on the so-called Prosperity Plan for Ukraine’s economic recovery, development and long-term resilience.

BlackRock, the global asset management company, was also present, according to a statement by Ukraine. The Commission did not mention BlackRock’s presence in its own statement.

The EU was represented by Björn Seibert, von der Leyen’s chief of cabinet, while Ukraine’s delegation was led by Rustem Umerov, its chief negotiator. The two meetings pave the way for Ukraine-US-Russia talks scheduled for 10-11 November in Abu Dhabi. My colleague Pietro Guastamacchia has the details.

EU fears ‘associate membership’ precedent

France, alongside Italy, Cyprus, the Netherlands and Spain, warned that Canada’s new “associate membership” status could open the door to similar arrangements with other non-EU countries, two diplomats said.

Mark Carney, while initially reluctant to embrace the label floated by Ursula von der Leyen in her annual speech in September, finally endorsed it last week at the end of the EU-Canada summit in Montreal.

Simon Mordue, von der Leyen’s chief diplomatic adviser, played down the concerns, noting that very few countries are as closely aligned with the EU as Canada.

The two sides now have until June to define the label.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 2204: Virág Gulyás: Hungary Has Succumbed To The Politics Of Gen Z

George Szamuely sat down for a conversation with political journalist Virág Gulyás about latest developments in Hungary and Europe.

01:01:37
Live Chat
November 02, 2026
Monday Night At The Movies: "Indictment: The McMartin Trial" (1995)

Join Gagglers for "Indictment: The McMartin Trial"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

02:11:53
November 01, 2026
TG 2203: Does Democracy Have A Future?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the fraudulence of so much of contemporary democracy advocacy.

01:34:52
January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals