TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Is the New Moral Consensus Irreversible?

I am posting an article by a British journalist. The article makes some interesting points, but in the end I found it facile, superficial and unconvincing.

There is a type of conservative--I assume the author Ed West is a small "c" conservative--who always wants to throw in the towel and declare the other side victors before the fight has even started. That way you get the best of all words. You receive praise from conservatives because, well, you sound like a conservative. And of course you receive praise from liberals for paying due deference to the winning team. Invitations to TV studios naturally beckon. It was a genre of writing perfected by the late Peregrine Worsthorne.

The author's thesis, in so far as I understand it, is that there once existed a moral consensus that the 1960s shattered. After 50 or so years of social and moral revolution we have more or less settled on a moral consensus, with fierce moral guardians enforcing the new woke norms with the same puritanical zeal that their 1950s predecessors had once applied.

It's a clever conceit, worthy of the late Peregrine Worsthorne. In fact, I am sure Worsthorne had written stuff like this himself over the years. However, I am not sure we have really reached a moral consensus, the enforcement of which will be all that straightforward. You could argue it the other way: It was during the 1960s that a consensus of sorts was forged. Back then, the guardians of society decided that it was silly to ban James Joyce and D.H. Lawrence and the movie "Clockwork Orange." The guardians decided that it was silly to outlaw homosexuality and abortion, that it was absurd to expect nice girls not to have sex before they got married and that it was reprehensible to be a racist. The public wasn't happy about it, but eventually accepted the new moral order.

What's happening today though is beyond what anyone could have imagined to be reasonable back then. Did anyone back then think that we would be forced to accept gay marriage as normal? Did anyone think that everyone would be free to decide what gender he or she is and would have the right to force others to accept it? Did anyone think that it would be reprehensible to object to late-term abortions? Did anyone think that taking down statues of anyone from the past with retrograde views would be acceptable? Did anyone think that children would be taught that whiteness is a debilitating condition? Maybe the guardians of the old pre-1960s order thought so, but their concerns were of course dismissed without too much effort.

So is everything settled now? Is there a new consensus? Are the views of AOC and the knee-taking English footballers the new normal? Maybe so. Countries such as Spain or Ireland, from whom you might have expected resistance to the new mores, are now among the wokest countries in the world. On the other hand, there is pushback against all of this in--of all places--France. No footballers other than those of England and Belgium have taken the knee. There is serious pushback from Russia. There is pushback also from Hungary and Poland--but they are small countries and will probably succumb once serious pressure is applied against them.

There is a wild card though: geopolitics. Within the next few years it will become increasingly apparent that the West is failing to keep up with China, that China is racing ahead in one field after another. China's social, economic and, above all, moral model is very different from that of the West. Will this cause a change in attitude in the West? Will the West suddenly decide: "Hey, maybe white men aren't so bad after all, maybe tearing down the past isn't the best way to build a future, maybe changing genders isn't the best way of ensuring population growth, maybe preoccupying yourself with rectifying past injustices is not the most effective way of reviving manufacturing industry?" I don't know.

What West fails to appreciate that the new moral consensus is one that appeals to very few people. Ultimately, a consensus can only take hold if more people benefit than lose from it.

https://unherd.com/2021/07/the-wests-cultural-revolution-is-over/

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
February 09, 2026
Monday Night At The Movies: "Seconds" (1966)

Join Gagglers for "Seconds"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

See you at 3 p.m. ET

01:47:19
February 08, 2026
TG 2067: Is There More Or Less To The Epstein Affair Than Meets The Eye?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the Jeffrey Epstein affair: the misconceptions, the misinterpretations, the distortions and the injustices.

01:42:08
February 06, 2026
The Gaggle Music Club: Karol Szymanowski’s Violin Concerto No.1

This week’s selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Karol Szymanowski’s Violin Concerto No.1 Op.35.

Karol Szymanowski (1882–1937) is widely considered to be Poland’s most important 20th century classical composer. Before Szymanowski, Polish music lived largely in the long shadow of Chopin; after Szymanowski, it became an integral part of European modernism.

Szymanowski was born in Tymoszówka, in what was then part of the Russian Empire (today Ukraine), into a cultivated, landowning Polish family. His early musical education consisted of absorbing late German Romanticism—Wagner and Richard Strauss above all. His early works reflected this influence.

It was during the years of World War I that he began to express a distinctive style of his own. Between 1914 and 1918, he produced the works on which his reputation rests: Myths for violin and piano, the First Violin Concerto, the Third Symphony (Song of the Night) and the conception of the opera King Roger.

These compositions were neither ...

00:25:09
16 hours ago

Multipolarity? What FUCKING multipolarity? They are not wrong there, they are the ONLY ones capable of doing it anywhere they please. Now that is power! Eat shit, escobar, you shameless hopium dealer for the gullible goyim
https://x.com/DeptofWar/status/2020833550488965503
When the @DeptofWar
says quarantine, we mean it. Nothing will stop DoW from defending our Homeland — even in oceans halfway around the world.

Overnight, U.S. military forces conducted a right-of-visit, maritime interdiction and boarding on the Aquila II without incident in the INDOPACOM area of responsibility.

The Aquila II was operating in defiance of President Trump's established quarantine of sanctioned vessels in the Caribbean. It ran, and we followed. The Department of War tracked and hunted this vessel from the Caribbean to the Indian Ocean. No other nation on planet Earth has the capability to enforce its will through any domain. By land, air, or sea, our Armed Forces will find you and deliver justice. You ...

February 08, 2026
Monday Night At The Movies: "Seconds" (1966)

Dear Gagglers:

Monday is, and has always been, a profoundly depressing day. That's why we have decided to add a little bit of fun to it.

On Monday, Feb. 9, we are holding another film screening. Gagglers can watch a movie and, as they do so, offer comments, random thoughts, aesthetic observations and critical insights in the Live Chat.

We will be screening the runner-up of The Gaggle's "Bourgeois Life and Its Discontents" poll: John Frankenheimer's terrifying masterpiece "Seconds," starring Rock Hudson.

The screening starts at 3 p.m. sharp.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060955/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_3_tt_6_nm_2_in_0_q_seconds

China's consumer confidence has completely collapsed:

China's consumer confidence index is down to ~90 points, near the lowest level on record.

The index plunged ~40 points between 2021 and 2022 and has remained at extremely pessimistic levels over the last 4 years.

Before that drop, the index never consistently fell below 100, even during the 2008 Financial Crisis.

This comes as China has experienced one of the largest housing bubble bursts in modern history.

As a result, home sales by floor area in China are now -50% below 2021 levels.

Chinese consumers need help. https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2021317572789141533

Trump on interest rates:

I’s just a paper charge when you think about it.

We should have the lowest interest rate in the world.

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals