TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
A Depressing Denouement

I find it very depressing that the only thing everybody is talking about when it comes to yesterday's Euro 2020 final is, as always, racism.

Millions of people all over the world watched and enjoyed the match. It was tough, tense and exciting. Somebody has to win, somebody has to lose. It's always painful to be on the losing side, particularly at the end of a very closely fought contest. Deciding tournament finals by penalty kicks seems particularly egregious. I am not sure why the football authorities decided on this remedy. Why can't competitors go on playing until there is a clear winner? It's what happens in other sports--baseball and tennis immediately spring to mind.

Be that as it may, that's what the football authorities decreed. Yesterday's final, like many other finals, was decided by the dreaded penalty kicks. What happened is what always happens: The team with nerves of steel prevailed. England, as is often its wont, failed at the crucial penalty stage--and Italy won out. Still, Italy failed on penalty kicks in the 1994 World Cup Final, with its star player Roberto Baggio missing the crucial final kick. It happened also to Chelsea captain John Terry in the 2008 UEFA Champions League final. So, everybody has had his share of disappointments. That's the way it goes in sport. You accept it, and start planning for the next tournament.

But that's not the way England has taken it. National hysteria has today taken hold of the country, but a hysteria of a peculiar sort. What's happening in England now is repugnant. Politicians and media and Internet worthies are demanding that the nation undergo self-laceration over its racism. Why? Well, we are told that black England players--particularly the three who missed their kicks--have been subjected to racist abuse since last night.

That may well be true. I haven't looked on social media, and don't particularly want to. I try to avoid reading stupid abusive comments. However, stupid abusive comments are part-and-parcel of the Internet. People hide, and have always hidden, behind anonymity. It enables them to be as insulting, as nasty and as threatening as they like without facing any consequences. There is no reason to pay any attention to people too cowardly to use their own names when hurling insults at others.

The proper response to the racist abuse would have been to dismiss it as too pathetic and worthless to merit serious attention. Instead, through the intervention of Boris Johnson, Prince William and the rest of Britain's buffoonish Tory government, stupid comments made by stupid people (many probably children or teenagers), something idiotic has been elevated into a national and even international crisis. Instead of celebrating a great sporting contest and a fine England footballing performance (the best in more than 50 years), the country and the world is talking, once again, about racism.

Twitter, according to this story in "The Hill" has taken down 1000 racist tweets. 1000! Let's see. Tens of millions of people around the world watched the match. 1000 tweets is a statistically insignificant number. Yet the story, as far as the media and the politicians are concerned, is these 1000 tweets. Our media-political class is truly pathetic.

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/562527-world-disgusted-by-racist-abuse-toward-players

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1905: U.S. Readies To Attack Iran; Question Remains: Why?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the apparent preparations the United States is making to launch attacks on Iran, and try to answer the baffling question: Why?

01:53:50
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Tout Va Bien" (1972)

Join Gagglers for the screening of the runner-up in The Gaggle's "France and the spirit of 1968" poll: Jean-Luc Godard's "Tout Va Bien"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

01:35:39
The Gaggle Music Club: Darius Milhaud's "La Création Du Monde"

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Darius Milhaud’s "La création du monde." Composed in 1923, the ballet in one act, is based on African creation myths, and is a pivotal work of early 20th-century music. It synthesizes African myth, jazz idioms and classical form.

Darius Milhaud (1892–1974) was born in Aix-en-Provence, France, into a Provençal Jewish family. He studied at the Paris Conservatoire, where he came under the influence of Charles-Marie Widor, Vincent d’Indy and Paul Dukas, but soon forged his own style, emphasizing polytonality (simultaneous use of multiple keys) and rhythmic energy.

Milhaud was a central figure in the composer collective Les Six, along with Francis Poulenc, Arthur Honegger, Georges Auric, Louis Durey, and Germaine Tailleferre. Les Six were not bound by a formal manifesto. They did not compose in the same style or even collaborate extensively. They objected to what they deemed to be Wagner’s heaviness and Debussy and Ravel’s dreamy impressionism....

00:17:03
Monday Night At The Movies

Please choose which one of the following 8 movies you would like to have screened next Monday, June 23.

The theme is "Peacetime Army Life."

Please continue to vote after June 9, so that we can determine the runner-up. The runner-up will be screened on June 30.

Boris Ivanov
·
Following
Studied History & Literature at Russian State University for the HumanitiesJun 8
How accurate is the claim that Vladimir Putin offered to negotiate a peace deal between President Trump and Elon Musk?

That’s not true. Former president Medvedev offered to do that, in exchange for shares of Starlink. That was, of course, trolling. These days, Medvedev is primarily known as an online troll, although he is also Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia. We don’t take most of his musings seriously.

World War Now:
🇺🇸 US President Donald Trump could fire Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard over a ( allegedly ) false report on Iran's nuclear program.

According to CBS, CIA Director John Ratcliffe met with Trump at the White House and presented him with evidence that Iran is supposedly weeks away from having a nuclear bomb.

@CIG_telegram

🇺🇸🇮🇷Today, reports began circulating on social media claiming that the United States is considering the use of tactical nuclear weapons against heavily fortified Iranian targets. These claims were allegedly attributed to coverage by Fox News.

However, Fox has clarified that the nuclear speculation did not originate with them but instead stemmed primarily from the British press.

These reports come amid growing concerns that U.S. conventional bunker-buster bombs may be insufficient to destroy Iran’s heavily protected Fordow nuclear facility—adding to the gravity of the situation.

⚡️🇮🇱🇮🇷 Iranian air defenses ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals