TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Steele Dossier Redux

Here we go again!

Under a three-reporter (including Luke Harding) byline, the "Guardian" today publishes a story, purportedly based on leaked Kremlin documents, claiming that Vladimir Putin himself authorized "a secret spy agency operation to support a 'mentally unstable' Donald Trump in the 2016 US presidential election."

During a Jan. 22, 2016, closed-session Russian national security council meeting, Putin ordered his "spy agencies" to "find practical ways to support Trump." A report allegedly prepared by "Putin’s expert department" recommended Moscow use “all possible force” to ensure a Trump victory.

This "report," which presumably is the basis of the "leaked" documents, appears to be "genuine," according to the "Guardian." That was the the finding of the "independent experts" to whom the paper showed the documents. No prizes for guessing the identity of these "independent experts."

The fraudulence of these documents is apparent from the beginning. Consider this: The Russians are said to have made a psychological assessment of Trump," and have determined him to be “impulsive, mentally unstable and unbalanced individual who suffers from an inferiority complex."

However, this is not the way Russian leaders or Russian media have ever seen Trump. Both Putin and Lavrov have addressed the subject of Trump many times. Trump, in their view, is a very talented, clever individual who wanted the United States to move away from Cold War dogmas and 1980s cliches when it came to relations with Russia and to the U.S.'s role in the world but who, ultimately, was done in by powerful domestic forces that he failed to bring under control. You can agree or disagree with that assessment. However, never once, have the Russians belittle him or hold him in contempt.

The description of Trump as "impulsive, mentally unstable and unbalanced individual who suffers from an inferiority complex" is one that is likely to come out of the mouths of the hosts and guests of CNN and MSNBC. It is a view of Trump that much of the U.K. foreign policymaking elite and security services would also share. Recall Kim Darroch, the former U.K. ambassador to Washington, who was forced to resign following publication of cables in which he described Trump as "inept," "insecure" and "incompetent."

Here we come to the likely origin of this supposed Kremlin "leak." The people behind it are almost certainly the same cast of characters that gave us the debunked Steele Dossier. Remember Christopher Steele had been a senior MI6 officer and, though retired when he compiled his infamous dossier, he was working in plain sight of MI6, which was very well aware of his dossier.

The "Guardian" story even hearkens back to the centerpiece of the Steele Dossier: the famous "kompromat." The Russians were supposed to have collected secret, damaging information on Trump that they could hold over him in order to get him to do their bidding. Here is today's "Guardian":

There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected... from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory.”

Apparently “certain events” were said to have taken place during Trump’s trips to Moscow. The "Guardian" slyly wants to suggest that maybe there was some truth to the Steele Dossier after all, while carefully avoiding any explicit reference to the notorious "events" that had made the Steele Dossier such a sensation: the so-called pee tape. Germaphobe Trump, a man who had spend his life in the hotel business and who would thus know all about secret cameras in hotel room, had apparently paid for Russian prostitutes to pee him. The story was ludicrous from the start, and it was eventually revealed that it had all been made up out of whole cloth.

And why would Russia want Donald Trump to win? A Trump victory, according to the report, would "definitely lead to the destabilization of the U.S.’s sociopolitical system.” This statement alone suggests that this document had to have been written long after 2016. Back then, we were asked to believe that, because the Russians had something on Trump, he helping to facilitate Russian foreign policy goals. Remember the tedious, discredited story that Trump softened the GOP platform on Ukraine? Once Trump began to pursue a policy on Ukraine that was more overtly anti-Russian than that of his predecessor, the story had to change. The new story was that the Russians wanted Trump to win, not because they had any specific policy goals in mind but because they wanted to sow chaos. And indeed these new documents push that story line.

Revealingly, the "Guardian" also admits that the documents make no mention of Hillary Clinton. That is definitely very strange, on the face of it. You would have thought that in 2016 the prospect of a Hillary Clinton presidency would be exercising the minds of the leaders of the Kremlin. But no! Apparently, their focus was exclusively on Trump. This again is clear evidence that this material was compiled long after 2016.

Who's behind it? Without a doubt the same characters who masterminded the RussiaGate hoax: the CIA, the NSA, GCHQ, MI6, the FBI. They are under no illusion that Trump won't run in 2024. So they are getting their "RussiaGate: The Sequel" story ready as early as possible.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/15/kremlin-papers-appear-to-show-putins-plot-to-put-trump-in-white-house

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
The Gaggle Music Club: Brahms’s Piano Quartet in G minor, As Orchestrated By Arnold Schoenberg

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Brahms’s Piano Quartet in G minor, Op. 25, as orchestrated by Arnold Schoenberg.

Johannes Brahms composed his Piano Quartet in G minor, Op. 25, between 1856 and 1861. It is understandable why Schoenberg was eager to orchestrate it. The quartet is a dramatic and expansive chamber work. It is made up of four movements, culminating in the famous “Rondo alla Zingarese.” Clara Schumann, Brahms’s lifelong friend and confidante, had described the piano quartet as “symphonic in breadth and power.” According to her, the quartet’s length (almost 50 minutes), the weight of its four movements and the sheer intensity of the piano part went beyond the intimate scope of chamber music.

The quartet premiered in Hamburg in 1861, with Clara herself playing the piano part in subsequent performances. Even before Schoenberg, musicians had made attempts to turn the quartet into a symphonic work. Friedrich Hermann (a Leipzig violinist and arranger) ...

00:48:43
Monday Night At The Movies: "L'Avventura" (1960)

Join Gagglers for "L'Avventura"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

02:23:06
September 14, 2025
TG 1968: U.S. Shows Contempt Toward Qatar; Israel Contempt Toward Qatar And U.S.

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss U.S. Security of State Marco Rubio's visit to Israel, and what that demonstrates about the Trump administration's real attitude toward Israel's attack on Doha, Qatar, an act that had supposedly enraged the president himself.

01:01:20
September 14, 2025
Israeli Conductor Ilan Volkov
12 hours ago

OK, I don't want to follow in the footsteps or our prolific poster, but one more quote for today. This is again from Duchesne's article on Unz. A great summing up.

Conclusion: Liberalism Has Already Eaten Its Own Tail

The liberal West, the most accomplished civilization in history, the progenitor of all the disciplinary fields of knowledge, including the greatest musicians, painters, furniture designers, writers of children’s books, mathematicians, philosophers, is now decomposing before our eyes. It is not that societies in the past did not have huge problems of their own, starting with generalized poverty, endemic violence, mass illiteracy and few opportunities for individual expression. It is not that the modern liberalism has been a failure from its inception. To the contrary: it has been responsible for rule of law, freedom of the press, open scientific inquiry, equality of civic rights, relatively peaceful resolution of political conflict, and sustained capitalist growth ...

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals