TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Steele Dossier Redux

Here we go again!

Under a three-reporter (including Luke Harding) byline, the "Guardian" today publishes a story, purportedly based on leaked Kremlin documents, claiming that Vladimir Putin himself authorized "a secret spy agency operation to support a 'mentally unstable' Donald Trump in the 2016 US presidential election."

During a Jan. 22, 2016, closed-session Russian national security council meeting, Putin ordered his "spy agencies" to "find practical ways to support Trump." A report allegedly prepared by "Putin’s expert department" recommended Moscow use “all possible force” to ensure a Trump victory.

This "report," which presumably is the basis of the "leaked" documents, appears to be "genuine," according to the "Guardian." That was the the finding of the "independent experts" to whom the paper showed the documents. No prizes for guessing the identity of these "independent experts."

The fraudulence of these documents is apparent from the beginning. Consider this: The Russians are said to have made a psychological assessment of Trump," and have determined him to be “impulsive, mentally unstable and unbalanced individual who suffers from an inferiority complex."

However, this is not the way Russian leaders or Russian media have ever seen Trump. Both Putin and Lavrov have addressed the subject of Trump many times. Trump, in their view, is a very talented, clever individual who wanted the United States to move away from Cold War dogmas and 1980s cliches when it came to relations with Russia and to the U.S.'s role in the world but who, ultimately, was done in by powerful domestic forces that he failed to bring under control. You can agree or disagree with that assessment. However, never once, have the Russians belittle him or hold him in contempt.

The description of Trump as "impulsive, mentally unstable and unbalanced individual who suffers from an inferiority complex" is one that is likely to come out of the mouths of the hosts and guests of CNN and MSNBC. It is a view of Trump that much of the U.K. foreign policymaking elite and security services would also share. Recall Kim Darroch, the former U.K. ambassador to Washington, who was forced to resign following publication of cables in which he described Trump as "inept," "insecure" and "incompetent."

Here we come to the likely origin of this supposed Kremlin "leak." The people behind it are almost certainly the same cast of characters that gave us the debunked Steele Dossier. Remember Christopher Steele had been a senior MI6 officer and, though retired when he compiled his infamous dossier, he was working in plain sight of MI6, which was very well aware of his dossier.

The "Guardian" story even hearkens back to the centerpiece of the Steele Dossier: the famous "kompromat." The Russians were supposed to have collected secret, damaging information on Trump that they could hold over him in order to get him to do their bidding. Here is today's "Guardian":

There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected... from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory.”

Apparently “certain events” were said to have taken place during Trump’s trips to Moscow. The "Guardian" slyly wants to suggest that maybe there was some truth to the Steele Dossier after all, while carefully avoiding any explicit reference to the notorious "events" that had made the Steele Dossier such a sensation: the so-called pee tape. Germaphobe Trump, a man who had spend his life in the hotel business and who would thus know all about secret cameras in hotel room, had apparently paid for Russian prostitutes to pee him. The story was ludicrous from the start, and it was eventually revealed that it had all been made up out of whole cloth.

And why would Russia want Donald Trump to win? A Trump victory, according to the report, would "definitely lead to the destabilization of the U.S.’s sociopolitical system.” This statement alone suggests that this document had to have been written long after 2016. Back then, we were asked to believe that, because the Russians had something on Trump, he helping to facilitate Russian foreign policy goals. Remember the tedious, discredited story that Trump softened the GOP platform on Ukraine? Once Trump began to pursue a policy on Ukraine that was more overtly anti-Russian than that of his predecessor, the story had to change. The new story was that the Russians wanted Trump to win, not because they had any specific policy goals in mind but because they wanted to sow chaos. And indeed these new documents push that story line.

Revealingly, the "Guardian" also admits that the documents make no mention of Hillary Clinton. That is definitely very strange, on the face of it. You would have thought that in 2016 the prospect of a Hillary Clinton presidency would be exercising the minds of the leaders of the Kremlin. But no! Apparently, their focus was exclusively on Trump. This again is clear evidence that this material was compiled long after 2016.

Who's behind it? Without a doubt the same characters who masterminded the RussiaGate hoax: the CIA, the NSA, GCHQ, MI6, the FBI. They are under no illusion that Trump won't run in 2024. So they are getting their "RussiaGate: The Sequel" story ready as early as possible.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/15/kremlin-papers-appear-to-show-putins-plot-to-put-trump-in-white-house

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Live Chat
Monday Night At The Movies: "Come And See" (1985)

Join Gagglers for "Come And See"!
The screening starts at 3 p.m. ET sharp.
Share all of your thoughts, comments and criticisms on the Live Chat.

02:22:49
TG 1934: U.K. (Half-Heartedly) Threatens To Recognize Palestinian State

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's threat to recognize a Palestinian state --but only under certain conditions--and wonder what, if any, difference a British recognition would make.

01:32:40
The Gaggle Music Club: Ottorino Respighi’s "Ancient Airs and Dances"

This week's selection of The Gaggle Music Club is Ottorino Respighi’s "Ancient Airs and Dances." The composition consists of a set of three orchestral suites composed between 1917 and 1932, based on lute pieces from the 16th and 17th centuries.

Ottorino Respighi (1879–1936) was an Italian composer, musicologist, conductor and orchestrator. He studied composition in Bologna and later trained in orchestration under Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov in Russia. The Russian master-orchestrator strongly influenced Respighi's approach to tone color. Respighi went on to become one of the most important figures in Italian music in the early 20th century. A significant part of Respighi’s output was devoted to reviving and reinterpreting early music. He created orchestral versions of lute pieces, Gregorian chant and harpsichord works. Unlike his contemporaries in Italy, he had little time for atonality and serialism.

For "Ancient Airs and Dances," Respighi, a skilled musicologist, drew on transcriptions of...

00:44:59
15 hours ago

Disclose.tv:
NEW - Trump said to warn Jewish donor that MAGA is "starting to hate Israel."

Read more: https://www.disclose.tv/id/s90cg7cb5m/

@disclosetv

JUST IN - U.S. imposes sanctions on Palestinian Authority and PLO officials, including denying visas, for failing to meet commitments.

https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2025/07/sanctioning-officials-of-the-palestinian-authority-and-members-of-the-palestine-liberation-organization

@disclosetv

NEW - Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir says, "Germany is returning to support Nazism" after Germany's Foreign Minister met with Netanyahu today amid speculation that Berlin may recognize the State of Palestine.

@disclosetv

JUST IN - Trump grants Mexico 90-day extension to reach trade deal, temporary tariffs remain in place.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114948452793702817

@disclosetv

8 minutes ago

abso-fucking-lutely
Citat
Spiro
@Spiro_Ghost
·
1 h
AI is writing the history books now...

Every time someone ask's Grok... Is this true?

This becomes more "true"

15 minutes ago
January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals