TheGaggle
Politics • Culture • News
Our community is made up of those who value the freedom of speech, the right to debate and the promise of open, honest conversations.

We don't agree on everything but we never silence our followers and value every opinion on our channel.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
January 12, 2025
The Gaggle Music Club

This week's selection for The Gaggle Music Club is Dmitri Shostakovich's Jazz Suite No. 2. Composed in 1938 for the State Jazz Orchestra of the USSR, the suite was created in a period when Shostakovich explored lighter genres to appeal to Soviet authorities who preferred accessible and entertaining music to appeal to a larger audience.

Jazz in the Soviet Union was carefully curated; it lacked the improvisational freedom of Western jazz and adhered more to dance and swing traditions, making Shostakovich’s piece closer to light orchestral music than to true jazz. Jazz Suite No. 2 was intended as a popular work that mixed jazz idioms with traditional classical and Soviet patriotic styles.

After its premiere, Jazz Suite No. 2 was largely forgotten. For decades, the work was presumed lost, but in 1999, musicologists identified surviving parts of the suite in the archives of the State Jazz Orchestra. These materials enabled them to reconstruct the piece, with clarifications and input by composers and conductors.

Today, Jazz Suite No. 2 is often mistaken for Shostakovich’s more famous Suite for Variety Orchestra, an entirely separate work compiled posthumously from fragments of different compositions. The reconstructed version of Jazz Suite No. 2 premiered in 2000 in the Netherlands and has since found its place in Shostakovich’s broader repertoire of lighter, more humorous works.

Jazz Suite No. 2 exemplifies Shostakovich’s skill in blending genres. While it includes jazzy elements—syncopated rhythms, prominent saxophone melodies, and light dance forms—it remains rooted in classical symphonic tradition. Though the music lacks the improvisational qualities of jazz, it captures the energy and accessibility of popular music in a classically-composed format.

Shostakovich often used humor to veil criticism of authoritarian rigidity. In Jazz Suite No. 2, there is an undercurrent of playful irony, evident in exaggerated marches and waltzes. The suite alternates between frothy humor and reflective melancholy, showing Shostakovich’s mastery in conveying depth even within light music. The middle movement, Lullaby, especially stands out for its bittersweet lyricism, a hallmark of Shostakovich’s ability to imbue even lighter works works with substance.

Jazz Suite No. 2 reflects Shostakovich’s complex navigation of Soviet cultural expectations. While adhering to official demands, the work maintains his artistic voice and experimentation with lighter, satirical tones. The suite complements Shostakovich’s larger, darker works by showing his versatility as a composer who could blend humor, accessibility and craft within the confines of ideological control.

The Podlaskie Opera and Philharmonic Symphonic Orchestra performed on Ja. 17, 2011, under the baton of Marcin Nałęcz-Niesiołowski.

00:25:12
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
TG 1923: Europe Eagerly Prepares For War With Russia

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss the eagerness on the part of Europe's elite to settle for nothing short of full-scale war with Russia.

01:11:57
TG 1922: Strange Deal: Trump To "Sell" Weapons To Ukraine By Way Of NATO

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's forthcoming announcement of a "new policy" on Russia and Ukraine, as well as his plan to deliver weapons to Ukraine by way of selling them first to NATO, and then having NATO transfer them to Ukraine.

01:03:21
TG 1921: Has Trump Now Adopted Biden's Policy On Ukraine?

George Szamuely and Peter Lavelle discuss President Trump's recent tirades against Russian President Putin along with warm, complimentary noises about Ukrainian President Zelensky, and wonder whether the U.S. president has now abandoned the policy of America First and instead adopted the policy of Joe Biden.

00:59:14

Leisure-Maxxing: Why Great Men Are LAZY

Wisdom Warriors

62.3K subscribers

Subscribed

37,229 views Jul 9, 2025

🌟Talk to me 1-1 & come find your brothers: https://calendly.com/kristian-bell333...

We’ve been sold the lie that busyness is greatness—but the truth is, most geniuses were “lazy” by today’s standards. In this video, I break down the lost aristocratic virtue of leisure, why true insight comes from rest (not grind), and how to structure your life like Goethe, Nietzsche, and other timeless minds who mastered the art of doing less, but better.

21 hours ago
July 11, 2025

World War Now:
🇮🇱❌🇮🇷 — In a letter to Iranian Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, Israel's former Defense Minister Yoav Galant says:

“We see everything in Iran.
We hear everything.
We are everywhere...

In more ways than one, we knew more about you than you knew about yourselves.”

Israeli Defense Minister Katz to Khamenei:

"If we have to return - we will return and with even greater force.

Israel's long arm will catch you in Tehran, Tabriz, Isfahan, and wherever you try to threaten and harm Israel from. There is no place where you can hide."

January 21, 2023
More Leftie Than Thou
"Jacobin" Magazine Celebrates A Strike Against Ol' Blue Eyes

Here at "The Gaggle" we have very little time for the "more Leftie than thou" school of thought--that's the approach to life according to which the only thing that matters is whether you take the right position on every issue under the sun from Abortion to Zelensky. No one in the world meets the exacting standards of this school of thought; any Leftie leader anywhere is always selling out to the bankers and the capitalists. The perfect exemplar of this is the unreadable Jacobin magazine. 

The other day I came across this article from 2021. It's a celebration of trade union power. And not simply trade union power, but the use of trade union power to secure political goals. Of course (and this is always the case with the "more Leftie than thou" crowd), this glorious, never-to-be-forgotten moment on the history of organized labor took place many years ago--in the summer of 1974 to be exact. Yes, almost half a century has gone by since that thrilling moment when the working-class movement of Australia mobilized and prepared to seize the means of production, distribution and exchange. 

Well, not quite. Organized labor went into action against...Ol' Blue Eyes, the Chairman of the Board, the Voice; yes, Frank Sinatra. Why? What had Sinatra done? Sinatra was certainly very rich, and he owned a variety of properties and businesses. But if the Australian trade union movement were, understandably, searching for the bright, incandescent spark that would finally awaken the working class from its slumber there were surely richer, greedier, more dishonest, more decadent, above all more Australian individuals it could have discovered. Australia was never short of them. Rupert Murdoch immediately springs to mind. Why Sinatra?

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals